Psychology in the decision making of Industrialised Building Systems (IBS): a field of application

Research in decision making is diverse in content and perspective. There is much to be learned from more fundamental managerial disciplines. Decision making is a sub-set of human behaviour rather than a completely separate phenomenon. Currently, there are likely that few decisional issues in the application of Industrialised Building Systems (IBS) require the invention of a completely new theory. If IBS technology research bases its viewpoint only on technical and managerial issues, its development will become less relevant to the construction world at large. In order to explore decision research methods into IBS decision making, psychological elements are applied to determine their influences on the decisions of IBS technology application. This paper discusses psychological elements that are relevant to decision making and the focus is on the adoption of IBS technology in building construction. This is presented by a discussion of psychological factors influencing the decision making of construction technology application. This is followed by a review of some predictions on the future of behavioural economics in construction technology application. This paper is concluded by suggesting that the research of psychology decision making should positively contribute to decision makers’ awareness, knowledge and skills, and these contributions should aim at the effectiveness of decision making in IBS technology application.

[1]  Iris Vessey,et al.  The effect of information presentation on decision making: A cost-benefit analysis , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Hege Westskog,et al.  Combining insights from economics and social psychology to explain environmentally significant consumption , 2008 .

[3]  A. S. Milani,et al.  A decision-based approach for measuring human behavioral resistance to organizational change in strategic planning , 2008, Math. Comput. Model..

[4]  Douglas W. Lyon,et al.  Enhancing Entrepreneurial Orientation Research: Operationalizing and Measuring a Key Strategic Decision Making Process , 2000 .

[5]  J. Doll,et al.  A Component Theory for Attitude Objects , 1989 .

[6]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  Agent-Oriented Supply-Chain Management , 2000 .

[7]  Carolyn A. Lin An Interactive Communication Technology Adoption Model , 2003 .

[8]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Heart Strings and Purse Strings , 2004, Psychological science.

[9]  Abang Abdullah Abang Ali,et al.  Construction performance comparison between conventional and industrialised building systems in Malaysia , 2006 .

[10]  Behavioral economics and decision making: Applying insights from psychology to understand how people make economic decisions , 2008 .

[11]  D. Jennings,et al.  Decision Making: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[12]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Information Pooling: When It Impacts Group Decision Making , 1998 .

[13]  Alfred Schuetz The Stranger: An Essay in Social Psychology , 1944, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  J. Eiser,et al.  Attitudes and decisions , 2015 .

[15]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. , 1991 .

[16]  P. Muris,et al.  Individual differences in decision-making , 2005 .

[17]  David M. Messick,et al.  Ethical Leadership and the Psychology of Decision Making , 2001 .

[18]  E. Fantino Behavior-analytic approaches to decision making , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[19]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Where To Go From Here? Thoughts on Future Directions for Research on Individual-Level Technology Adoption with a Focus on Decision Making , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[20]  Henry Sauermann,et al.  Vocational Choice: A Decision Making Perspective. , 2005 .

[21]  L. Hasher,et al.  Age differences in choice satisfaction: a positivity effect in decision making. , 2008, Psychology and aging.

[22]  Yuosre F. Badir,et al.  Industrialized Building Systems Construction in Malaysia , 2002 .

[23]  Christopher Y. Olivola,et al.  Doing Unto Future Selves As You Would Do Unto Others: Psychological Distance and Decision Making , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[24]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .