How important are rare species in aquatic community ecology and bioassessment?

We examined the effects of excluding rare species on the comparison of species richness. A river benthic data set and a randomization resampling procedure were used to show the importance of this consideration in aquatic bioassessment in particular. The data set was manipulated by deleting species at three levels of rarity as defined by occurrence frequency: once in all 24 replicates from each of three sites, no more than twice, and no more than five times. We focused on differences in species richness because many other bioassessment metrics are dependent on species richness and species composition. Species abundance patterns at the three sites were very different, with many more rare species at the least impacted site than at the more impacted sites. As sample size increased, the diffcrcnces in species richness among the three sites markedly increased in the original data set. However, the exclusion of rare species at the same level of rarity substantially reduced species richness at the least impacted site but had little effect on the most impacted site. This result led to a serious underestimation of the differences in species richness among the sites in terms of both absolute numbers and species loss percentages. Deleting rare species can damage the sensitivity of community-based methods to detect ecological changes; rare species are critical for bioassessment.

[1]  L. Barmuta,et al.  Preliminary study of the ordination and classification of macroinvertebrate communities from running waters in Victoria, Australia , 1994 .

[2]  Charles P. Hawkins,et al.  Effects of Sampling Area and Subsampling Procedure on Comparisons of Taxa Richness among Streams , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[3]  R. Gregory.  Species abundance patterns of British birds , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  N. Gotelli,et al.  NULL MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 1996 .

[5]  J. Connell.  Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[6]  J. Summers,et al.  MACROBENTHIC RESPONSES TO NATURAL AND CONTAMINANT-RELATED GRADIENTS IN NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO ESTUARIES , 1997 .

[7]  Lloyd Goldwasser,et al.  SAMPLING EFFECTS AND THE ESTIMATION OF FOOD‐WEB PROPERTIES , 1997 .

[8]  C. Krebs.  Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance , 1973 .

[9]  C. B. Williams.  Ecology. (Book Reviews: Patterns in the Balance of Nature. And related problems in quantitative ecology) , 1966 .

[10]  Marco A. Rodríguez,et al.  STRUCTURE OF FISH ASSEMBLAGES ALONG ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENTS IN FLOODPLAIN LAKES OF THE ORINOCO RIVER , 1997 .

[11]  F. A. Bazzaz,et al.  Plant Species Diversity in Old‐Field Successional Ecosystems in Southern Illinois , 1975 .

[12]  Mutsunori Tokeshi,et al.  Species Abundance Patterns and Community Structure , 1993 .

[13]  S. Hurlbert.  The Nonconcept of Species Diversity: A Critique and Alternative Parameters. , 1971, Ecology.

[14]  J. Lyons,et al.  Index of Biotic Integrity Based on Fish Assemblages for the Conservation of Streams and Rivers in West‐Central Mexico , 1995 .

[15]  J. Ford.  The Effects of Chemical Stress on Aquatic Species Composition and Community Structure , 1989 .

[16]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[17]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[18]  F. W. Preston.  The Canonical Distribution of Commonness and Rarity: Part I , 1962 .

[19]  R. May.  Patterns of species abundance and diversity , 1975 .

[20]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Multivariate analysis in community ecology , 1984 .

[21]  Robert G. Randall,et al.  An Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) for Fish Assemblages in the Littoral Zone of Great Lakes' Areas of Concern , 1994 .

[22]  John S. Gray,et al.  Detecting pollution induced changes in communities using the log-normal distribution of individuals among species , 1981 .

[23]  Nancy B. Grimm,et al.  Stability of an Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Community in a Multiyear Hydrologic Disturbance Regime , 1992 .

[24]  James R. Karr,et al.  Assessing Invertebrate Responses to Human Activities: Evaluating Alternative Approaches , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[25]  C. Mason,et al.  Biology of Freshwater Pollution. , 1982 .

[26]  R. Macarthur.  PATTERNS OF SPECIES DIVERSITY , 1965 .

[27]  T. Pearson,et al.  Objective Selection of Sensitive Species Indicative of Pollution-Induced Change in Benthic Communities. I. Comparative Methodology , 1982 .

[28]  H. L. Sanders,et al.  Marine Benthic Diversity: A Comparative Study , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[29]  R. Fisher,et al.  The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population , 1943 .

[30]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: history and present status in Europe. , 1989, Environmental pollution.

[31]  D. Williams.  Temporary ponds and their invertebrate communities , 1997 .

[32]  Á. Baltanás,et al.  On the use of some methods for the estimation of species richness , 1992 .

[33]  G. Minshall,et al.  Effects of Disturbance Frequency on Stream Benthic Community Structure in Relation to Canopy Cover and Season , 1986, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.