Syntax and processing in Seediq: a behavioral study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Masatoshi Koizumi | Jungho Kim | Hajime Ono | Manami Sato | Apay Ai-yu Tang | Masatoshi Koizumi | Jungho Kim | Hajime Ono | Manami Sato | A. Tang
[1] David Caplan,et al. Task-dependent and task-independent neurovascular responses to syntactic processing , 2008, Cortex.
[2] David Kemmerer,et al. The Cross-Linguistic Prevalence of SOV and SVO Word Orders Reflects the Sequential and Hierarchical Representation of Action in Broca's Area , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[3] M. Saito,et al. Order in Phrase Structure and Movement , 1998, Linguistic Inquiry.
[4] Masatoshi Koizumi,et al. Effect of Animacy on Word Order Processing in Kaqchikel Maya , 2013 .
[5] Edward Gibson,et al. Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[6] Arthur Holmer. Seediq – antisymmetry and final particles in a Formosan VOS language , 2005 .
[7] Beatrice Primus,et al. Cases and thematic roles : ergative, accusative and active , 1999 .
[8] Per B. Brockhoff,et al. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .
[9] J. Trueswell,et al. The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language , 2004, Cognition.
[10] Markus Bader,et al. Subject-Object Ambiguities in German Embedded Clauses: An Across-the-Board Comparison , 1999 .
[11] J. Henderson,et al. Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken-language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving-window technique. , 1996 .
[12] J. K. Bock,et al. Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.
[13] C. Fiebach,et al. Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German WH-questions , 2002 .
[14] T. Jaeger,et al. Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.
[15] Masatoshi Koizumi,et al. On the (non)universality of the preference for subject-object word order in sentence comprehension: A sentence-processing study in Kaqchikel Maya , 2014 .
[16] Heeju Hwang,et al. The role of thematic role accessibility in production: evidence from Korean , 2017 .
[17] Douglas Roland,et al. Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[18] T. Florian Jaeger,et al. The Cross-linguistic Study of Sentence Production , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[19] Irina A. Sekerina. Scrambling and Processing: Dependencies, Complexity, and Constraints , 2008 .
[20] Hiromu Sakai,et al. The Effects of Phrase-Length Order and Scrambling in the Processing of Visually Presented Japanese Sentences , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[21] Sebastian Sauppe. Verbal Semantics Drives Early Anticipatory Eye Movements during the Comprehension of Verb-Initial Sentences , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[22] Matthias Schlesewsky,et al. The Subject Preference in the Processing of Locally Ambiguous WH-Questions in German , 2000 .
[23] Shigeru Sato,et al. Scrambling effects on the processing of Japanese sentences: An fMRI study , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.
[24] C. Felser,et al. Antecedent Priming at Trace Positions in Japanese Long-Distance Scrambling , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[25] Daichi Yasunaga,et al. Is the subject-before-object preference universal? An event-related potential study in the Kaqchikel Mayan language , 2015 .
[26] Sonja Riesberg,et al. Symmetrical Voice and Linking in Western Austronesian Languages , 2014 .
[27] Masatoshi Koizumi,et al. Greater Left Inferior Frontal Activation for SVO than VOS during Sentence Comprehension in Kaqchikel , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[28] M. Kutas,et al. Not so secret agents: Event-related potentials to semantic roles in visual event comprehension , 2017, Brain and Cognition.
[29] E. Gibson. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .
[30] L. Rizzi. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .
[31] Kate Stewart,et al. Starting points , 2020, SIGP.
[32] Judith Aissen. Topic and focus in Mayan , 1992 .
[33] N. C. England. Changes in Basic Word Order in Mayan Languages , 1991, International Journal of American Linguistics.
[34] Colin Phillips,et al. Relating structure and time in linguistics and psycholinguistics , 2007 .
[35] Beatrice Primus,et al. Cases and thematic roles , 1999 .
[36] M. Pickering,et al. Conceptual influences on word order and voice in sentence production: Evidence from Japanese , 2011 .
[37] A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al. Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolution in a free word order language: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque , 2009, Brain and Language.
[38] Masataka Yano,et al. Processing of non-canonical word orders in (in)felicitous contexts: evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2018, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.
[39] Kathryn Bock,et al. Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .
[40] Holly P. Branigan,et al. Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production , 2008 .
[41] A. Weinberg,et al. Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language , 2004 .
[42] D. Bates,et al. Parsimonious Mixed Models , 2015, 1506.04967.
[43] Maria Polinsky,et al. Subject preference and ergativity , 2012 .
[44] D. Bates,et al. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.
[45] Neil Cohn,et al. Prediction, events, and the advantage of Agents: The processing of semantic roles in visual narrative , 2013, Cognitive Psychology.
[46] Rutz'ib'axik ri Kaqchikel , 1994 .
[47] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Grammar overrides frequency: evidence from the online processing of flexible word order , 2002, Cognition.
[48] Masataka Yano,et al. Syntax and processing in Seediq: an event-related potential study , 2019, Journal of East Asian Linguistics.
[49] Agnieszka E. Konopka,et al. Dependencies First: Eye Tracking Evidence from Sentence Production in Tagalog , 2013, CogSci.
[50] R. Baayen,et al. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .
[51] C. Phillips,et al. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[52] D. Barr,et al. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.
[53] E. Aldridge. Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages , 2004 .
[54] Dominique Sportiche. A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure , 1988 .
[55] T. Jaeger,et al. Cross-linguistic psycholinguistics and its critical role in theory development: early beginnings and recent advances , 2015 .
[56] H. Mai,et al. The costs of freedom: an ERP – study of non-canonical sentences , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[57] Takahiro Soshi,et al. A Topographical Study on the Event-related Potential Correlates of Scrambled Word Order in Japanese Complex Sentences , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[58] M. H. Kelly,et al. Word and World Order: Semantic, Phonological, and Metrical Determinants of Serial Position , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.