NAFTA and cross‐border relations in Niagara, Detroit, and Vancouver

Abstract This paper addresses two questions. First, does free trade, and particularly economic integration, lead to a process of functional interdependency and to cross‐border linkages in North America? Second, do politics and institutions mediate this process? Specifically, how does the intergovernmental network linking local, regional, provincial/state, and federal institutions mediate this process and impact local level initiatives? To investigate these questions, this work focuses on cross‐border relations in three metropolitan border areas: the Canadian‐American border regions of Niagara‐Niagara, Windsor‐Detroit, and Vancouver‐Seattle. This study takes a Canadian perspective and thus primarily focuses on Canada, Ontario, and British Columbia, and on Niagara, Windsor, and Vancouver and their border regions. The findings presented in this paper suggest that economic integration may lead to cross‐border institution building when borderland communities also share the same value system.

[1]  S. Zielinski,et al.  International Court of Justice , 2002, International Organization.

[2]  T. Courchene,et al.  Ontario as a North American region state , 1999 .

[3]  E. Haas.  The Uniting of Europe , 1958 .

[4]  Globalization and the Decline of Social Reform , 1995 .

[5]  A. Moravcsik,et al.  Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach , 1993 .

[6]  Notis Lebessis,et al.  Governance in the European Union , 2001 .

[7]  Ian Clark,et al.  A ‘Borderless World’? , 2000 .

[8]  M. Keating.  The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change , 2000 .

[9]  Lloyd Geering.  The End of the Millennium , 1999 .

[10]  Emmanuel Brunet-Jailly.  Globalization, Integration, and Cross-Border Relations in the Metropolitan Area of Detroit (USA) and Windsor (Canada) , 2000 .

[11]  F. Stern,et al.  The New European Community , 1992 .

[12]  John D. Robertson.  The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance , 2003, The Journal of Politics.

[13]  D. Latouche,et al.  Perforated sovereignties and international relations : trans-sovereign contacts of subnational governments , 1988 .

[14]  L. Pal,et al.  Border crossings : the internationalization of Canadian public policy , 1996 .

[15]  Luciano Vandelli,et al.  The End of the Nation-State , 2003 .

[16]  N. Rahimieh,et al.  Border Crossing , 2007 .

[17]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Borderless World , 1990 .

[18]  M V Fenton,et al.  The North American Free Trade Agreement. , 1994, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[19]  A. Moravcsik,et al.  The choice for Europe , 1998 .

[20]  G. White.  The government and politics of Ontario , 1990 .

[21]  Donald K. Alper.  Emerging collaborative frameworks for environmental governance in the Georgia basin‐Puget sound ecosystem , 2004 .

[22]  D. Mitrany,et al.  The functional theory of politics , 1976 .

[23]  I. Crawford.  Beyond the nation-state , 1992, Nature.

[24]  C. Hill,et al.  Ideas and foreign policy: beliefs, institutions and political change , 1994 .

[25]  E. Isin.  Rethinking the origins of canadian municipal government , 1995 .

[26]  Karl W. Deutsch,et al.  Political Community And The North Atlantic Area , 1958 .

[27]  J. Keeley.  Cast in Concrete for All Time? The Negotiation of the Auto Pact , 1983, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[28]  Kim Richard Nossal,et al.  The International Joint Commission Seventy Years On , 1982 .

[29]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Multi-Level Governance and European Integration , 2001 .