Selection of ancillary data to derive production management units in sweet corn (Zea Mays var. rugosa) using MANOVA and an information criterion

In production systems where high-resolution harvest data are unavailable there is often a reliance on ancillary information to generate potential management units. In these situations correct identification of relevant sources of data is important to minimize cost to the grower. For three fields in a sweet corn production system in central NSW, Australia, several sets of high-resolution data were obtained using soil and crop canopy sensors. Management units were derived by k-means classification for 2–5 classes using three approaches: (1) with soil data, (2) with crop data and (3) a combination of both soil and crop data. Crop quantity and quality were sampled manually, and the sample data were related to the different management units using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) was then used to rank the different sources of data and the different orders of management units. For irrigated, short-season sweet corn production the management units derived from the crop canopy sensor data explained more variation in key harvest variables than management units derived from an apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa) survey or a mixture of crop and soil sensor data. Management units derived from crop data recorded just prior to side-dressing outperformed management units derived from data recorded earlier in the season. However, multi-temporal classification of early and mid-season crop data gave better results than single layer classification at any time. For all three fields in this study, a 3- or 4-unit classification gave the best results according to the information criterion (AICc). For growers interested in adopting differential management in irrigated sweet corn, investment in a crop canopy sensor will provide more useful high-resolution information than that in a high-resolution ECa survey.

[1]  Shmulik P. Friedman,et al.  Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: a review , 2005 .

[2]  P. Gerard,et al.  Soil Management Zone Determination by Yield Stability Analysis and Classification , 2007 .

[3]  L. C. Grappadelli,et al.  Spatial Analysis of the Effect of Fruit Thinning on Apple Crop Load , 2009 .

[4]  R. Lark,et al.  Classification as a first step in the interpretation of temporal and spatial variation of crop yield , 1997 .

[5]  T. A. Gemtos,et al.  Spatial variation in yield and quality in a small apple orchard , 2010, Precision Agriculture.

[6]  C. Tucker Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[7]  Bruno Basso,et al.  Delineation of site-specific management zones using geostatistics and fuzzy clustering analysis , 2009 .

[8]  Brett Whelan,et al.  Definition and interpretation of potential management zones in Australia , 2003 .

[9]  David Lamb,et al.  PA—Precision Agriculture: Remote-Sensing and Mapping of Weeds in Crops , 2001 .

[10]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[11]  P. C. Robert,et al.  Variability of soil and landscape attributes within sub-field management zones. , 2000 .

[12]  Jb Robinson,et al.  Plant Analysis: An Interpretation Manual , 1997 .

[13]  P. Martin-Prével,et al.  Plant analysis — as a guide to the nutrient requirements of temperate and tropical crops , 1989, Plant Growth Regulation.

[14]  James A. Taylor,et al.  Spatial Variability of Kiwifruit Quality in Orchards and Its Implications for Sampling and Mapping , 2007 .

[15]  Graham Jewitt,et al.  Spatial mapping of leaf area index using hyperspectral remote sensing for hydrological applications with a particular focus on canopy interception , 2009 .

[16]  Brigitte Charnomordic,et al.  A segmentation algorithm for the delineation of agricultural management zones , 2010 .

[17]  Analysis of the spatial variability of production attributes in sweet corn , 2010 .

[18]  R. Lark Some tools for parsimonious modelling and interpretation of within-field variation of soil and crop systems , 2001 .

[19]  C. Fraisse,et al.  Management Zone Analyst ( MZA ) : Software for Subfield Management Zone Delineation , 2003 .

[20]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[21]  Clyde W. Fraisse,et al.  Management Zone Analyst (MZA) , 2004, Agronomy Journal.

[22]  Newell R. Kitchen,et al.  Two classification methods for developing and interpreting productivity zones using site properties , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[23]  Brett Whelan,et al.  Establishing Management Classes for Broadacre Agricultural Production , 2007 .

[24]  A. McQuarrie,et al.  Regression and Time Series Model Selection , 1998 .

[25]  Richard E. Zartman,et al.  DELINEATING POTENTIAL MANAGEMENT ZONES FOR COTTON BASED ON YIELDS AND SOIL PROPERTIES , 2005 .

[26]  G. Hoogenboom,et al.  Developing a Sweet Corn Simulation Model to Predict Fresh Market Yield and Quality of Ears , 2007 .

[27]  Z. L. Frogbrook,et al.  Identifying management zones in agricultural fields using spatially constrained classification of soil and ancillary data , 2007 .