Cement Distribution, Volume, and Compliance in Vertebroplasty: Some Answers From an Anatomy-Based Nonlinear Finite Element Study

Study Design. The biomechanics of vertebral bodies augmented with real distributions of cement were investigated using nonlinear finite element (FE) analysis. Objectives. To compare stiffness, strength, and stress transfer of augmented versus nonaugmented osteoporotic vertebral bodies under compressive loading. Specifically, to examine how cement distribution, volume, and compliance affect these biomechanical variables. Summary of Background Data. Previous FE studies suggested that vertebroplasty might alter vertebral stress transfer, leading to adjacent vertebral failure. However, no FE study so far accounted for real cement distributions and bone damage accumulation. Methods. Twelve vertebral bodies scanned with high-resolution pQCT and tested in compression were augmented with various volumes of cements and scanned again. Nonaugmented and augmented pQCT datasets were converted to FE models, with bone properties modeled with an elastic, plastic and damage constitutive law that was previously calibrated for the nonaugmented models. The cement-bone composite was modeled with a rule of mixture. The nonaugmented and augmented FE models were subjected to compression and their stiffness, strength, and stress map calculated for different cement compliances. Results. Cement distribution dominated the stiffening and strengthening effects of augmentation. Models with cement connecting either the superior or inferior endplate (S/I fillings) were only up to 2 times stiffer than the nonaugmented models with minimal strengthening, whereas those with cement connecting both endplates (S + I fillings) were 1 to 8 times stiffer and 1 to 12 times stronger. Stress increases above and below the cement, which was higher for the S + I cases and was significantly reduced by increasing cement compliance. Conclusion. The developed FE approach, which accounts for real cement distributions and bone damage accumulation, provides a refined insight into the mechanics of augmented vertebral bodies. In particular, augmentation with compliant cement bridging both endplates would reduce stress transfer while providing sufficient strengthening.

[1]  R. Wilcox,et al.  The Biomechanical Effect of Vertebroplasty on the Adjacent Vertebral Body: A Finite Element Study , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[2]  Joshua A Hirsch,et al.  Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. , 2003, Radiology.

[3]  E. Schneider,et al.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[4]  Christoph Fankhauser,et al.  Augmentation of mechanical properties in osteoporotic vertebral bones – a biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty efficacy with different bone cements , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[5]  S. Belkoff,et al.  The Biomechanics of Vertebroplasty: The Effect of Cement Volume on Mechanical Behavior , 2001, Spine.

[6]  J. Nemes,et al.  Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element study , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[7]  G. Baroud,et al.  Biomechanical impact of vertebroplasty. Postoperative biomechanics of vertebroplasty. , 2006, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[8]  Swee Hin Teoh,et al.  Preliminary Study on Biomechanics of Vertebroplasty: A Computational Fluid Dynamics and Solid Mechanics Combined Approach , 2007, Spine.

[9]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Biomechanical Explanation of Adjacent Fractures Following Vertebroplasty [letter] * Dr Hirsch and colleagues respond: , 2003 .

[10]  P. Heini,et al.  Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: operative technique and early results , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[11]  L. Nolte,et al.  The Effect of Cement Augmentation on the Load Transfer in an Osteoporotic Functional Spinal Unit: Finite-Element Analysis , 2003, Spine.

[12]  Nico Verdonschot,et al.  The Influence of Endplate-to-Endplate Cement Augmentation on Vertebral Strength and Stiffness in Vertebroplasty , 2007, Spine.

[13]  T. S. Keller,et al.  Damage-based finite-element vertebroplasty simulations , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[14]  D. Kallmes,et al.  New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  K. Sun,et al.  Biomechanics of Prophylactic Vertebral Reinforcement , 2004, Spine.

[16]  T. Diamond,et al.  Management of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a nonrandomized trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[17]  J. Nemes,et al.  Biomechanical explanation of adjacent fractures following vertebroplasty. , 2003, Radiology.

[18]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Element Model Predicts Vertebral Bone Strength and Fracture Site , 2006, Spine.

[20]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Cortical and Trabecular Load Sharing in the Human Vertebral Body , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[21]  Cari M Whyne,et al.  Biomechanical assessment of stability in the metastatic spine following percutaneous vertebroplasty: effects of cement distribution patterns and volume. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  K T Ison,et al.  The strengthening effect of percutaneous vertebroplasty. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[23]  J. Lotz,et al.  The effect on anterior column loading due to different vertebral augmentation techniques. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Effects of Bone Cement Volume and Distribution on Vertebral Stiffness After Vertebroplasty , 2001, Spine.

[25]  P. Zysset,et al.  An Alternative Fabric-based Yield and Failure Criterion for Trabecular Bone , 2006 .