What Drives Innovation in Communication Satellites? Lessons from History

*† ‡ This paper captures the first detailed attempt to quantitatively analyze innovation in the space sector. Building on a communication satellite innovation metric and a spacecraft innovation framework developed as part of an ongoing project, this paper presents a preliminary model of communication satellite innovation. In addition to innovation being a function of the rate of performance normalized by price, innovation was found to be strongly influenced by characteristics of the customer-contractor contractual relationship. Specifically, DoD contracts tend to result in a lower level of innovation on average as compared to other customers and particular customer-contractor pairs perform differently and exhibit a second order relationship in time. Nomenclature α,β,γ, = regression coefficients for technical, generational and contractual components respectively Ci = contractual parameter t = time gi = generational parameter Icuiconj = customer contractor interaction effect IM = innovation metric Mconti = contractor main effect Mcusti = customer main effect

[1]  J. William,et al.  Innovation : Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction : Research Policy , 1987 .

[2]  K. Kornman,et al.  The "innovator's dilemma" for periodontists. , 2010, Journal of periodontology.

[3]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[4]  K. Clark,et al.  Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆ , 1993 .

[5]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[6]  Zoe Szajnfarber,et al.  Are Spacecraft Cheaper or More Expensive Now, and Why? Spacecraft Innovation Trends , 2007 .

[7]  Zoe Szajnfarber,et al.  Implications of DoD Acquisition Policy for Innovation: The Case of Operationally Responsive Space , 2008 .

[8]  W. Abernathy Innovation : Mapping the winds of creative destruction * , 2003 .

[9]  Donald H Martin Communication Satellites, 1958-1992 , 1991 .

[10]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[11]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[12]  R. Rothwell Towards the Fifth‐generation Innovation Process , 1994 .

[13]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  Reindustrialization and Technology , 1985 .

[14]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[15]  Walter Adams,et al.  The Military-Industrial Complex: A Market Structure Analysis , 1972 .