Functional diversity and team innovation

Background Bringing together professionals with different knowledge and skills comes with the opportunity to spur the innovativeness of primary care teams. Nevertheless, empirical evidence shows that it is not self-evident that these innovations are also realized. The social categorization theory suggests that a better understanding of whether these potential team innovations are realized can be obtained by looking at the social cohesion of such teams. Purpose The aim of this study was to study the relationship between functional diversity and team innovation in primary care teams by examining the mediating role of social cohesion. Methodology Survey responses and administrative data of 887 primary care professionals and 75 supervisors in 100 primary care teams were analyzed. Structural equation modeling was used to examine a curvilinear mediated relationship among functional diversity and team innovation through social cohesion. Results The findings show a positive relationship between social cohesion and team innovation as expected. Contrary to the expectations, the relationship between functional diversity and social cohesion is insignificant, and the results show an inverted U-shaped relationship between functional diversity and team innovation instead. Conclusions This study reveals an unexpected inverted U-shaped relationship between functional diversity and team innovation. This relationship is not mediated by social cohesion; however, social cohesion is still a significant predictor of team innovation. Practice Implications Policymakers should be aware of the relevance as well as the complexity of creating social cohesion in functionally diverse primary care teams. As long as it remains unknown how social cohesion is stimulated in functionally diverse teams, it seems best for the team innovation to prevent bringing together too many, but also too few, different functions.

[1]  Mayowa T. Babalola,et al.  Building Cohesive Teams—The Role of Leaders’ Bottom-Line Mentality and Behavior , 2021, Sustainability.

[2]  R. Mitchell,et al.  The curvilinear effect of professional faultlines on team innovation: The pivotal role of professional identity threat , 2021 .

[3]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Professional faultlines and interprofessional differentiation in multidisciplinary team innovation: The moderating role of inclusive leadership , 2020, Health care management review.

[4]  Robert J. Stroebel,et al.  The impact of clinic design on teamwork development in primary care. , 2019, Health care management review.

[5]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Inspirational leadership, positive mood, and team innovation: A moderated mediation investigation into the pivotal role of professional salience , 2019, Human Resource Management.

[6]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Team Diversity in Innovation--Salient Research in the Journal of Product Innovation Management , 2018, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[7]  B. Steijn,et al.  Towards sustainable local welfare systems: The effects of functional heterogeneity and team autonomy on team processes in Dutch neighbourhood teams , 2018, Health & social care in the community.

[8]  Markus Groth,et al.  Reaping the Rewards of Functional Diversity in Healthcare Teams: Why Team Processes Improve Performance , 2018 .

[9]  C. Mainemelis,et al.  A metatheoretical framework of diversity in teams , 2017 .

[10]  L. Poghosyan,et al.  Nurse practitioner-physician comanagement of primary care patients: The promise of a new delivery care model to improve quality of care. , 2017, Health care management review.

[11]  Eric W. K. Tsang,et al.  Re-examining the functional diversity–performance relationship: The roles of behavioral integration, team cohesion, and team learning , 2016 .

[12]  G. Russell,et al.  Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries , 2016, Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare.

[13]  R. Dhar,et al.  Transformational Leadership, Innovation Climate, Creative Self-Efficacy and Employee Creativity: A Multilevel Study , 2015 .

[14]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Professional diversity, identity salience and team innovation: The moderating role of openmindedness norms , 2015 .

[15]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation and Creativity in Organizations , 2014 .

[16]  Antonio Solanas,et al.  Some Common Indices of Group Diversity: Upper Boundaries , 2012, Psychological reports.

[17]  Andrew M. Farrell,et al.  Factor analysis and discriminant validity:a brief review of some practical issues , 2009 .

[18]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[19]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement , 2008 .

[20]  Phil Wood.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2008 .

[21]  J. Perry-Smith.  Social Yet Creative: The Role Of Social Relationships In Facilitating Individual Creativity , 2006 .

[22]  Brian R. Dineen.  Teamxchange: A Team Project Experience Involving Virtual Teams and Fluid Team Membership , 2005 .

[23]  M. West,et al.  The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation:a special issue introduction , 2004 .

[24]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  A Healthy Divide: Subgroups as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior , 2003 .

[25]  Carsten K. W. De Dreu,et al.  Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity , 2002 .

[26]  M. West.  Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[27]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[28]  R. Keller,et al.  Cross-Functional Project Groups in Research and New Product Development: Diversity, Communications, Job Stress, and Outcomes , 2001 .

[29]  S. Webber,et al.  Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis , 2001 .

[30]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[31]  S. Carless,et al.  The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams , 2000 .

[32]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[33]  P. Bliese,et al.  Group Size and Measures of Group-Level Properties: An Examination of Eta-Squared and ICC Values , 1998 .

[34]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[35]  J. Stevens,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1993 .

[36]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[37]  Bertolt Meyer,et al.  Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures , 2017 .

[38]  J. Turner,et al.  Self-categorization theory , 2012 .

[39]  R. Poell,et al.  Learning from differences : The relationships between team expertise diversity, team learning, team performance, and team innovation , 2010 .

[40]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[42]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .