International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Current Issues in Bladder Cancer. Working Group 4

Molecular subtyping has been a major focus of bladder cancer research over the past decade. Despite many promising associations with clinical outcomes and treatment response, its clinical impact has yet to be defined. As part of the 2022 International Society of Urological Pathology Conference on Bladder Cancer, we reviewed the current state of the science for bladder cancer molecular subtyping. Our review included several different subtyping systems. We derived the following 7 principles, which summarize progress and challenges of molecular subtyping: (1) bladder cancer has 3 major molecular subtypes: luminal, basal-squamous, and neuroendocrine; (2) signatures of the tumor microenvironment differ greatly among bladder cancers, particularly among luminal tumors; (3) luminal bladder cancers are biologically diverse, and much of this diversity results from differences in features unrelated to the tumor microenvironment, such as FGFR3 signaling and RB1 inactivation; (4) molecular subtype of bladder cancer associates with tumor stage and histomorphology; (5) many subtyping systems include idiosyncrasies, such as subtypes recognized by no other system; (6) there are broad fuzzy borders between molecular subtypes, and cases that fall on these fuzzy borders are often classified differently by different subtyping systems; and (7) when there are histomorphologically distinct regions within a single tumor, the molecular subtypes of these regions are often discordant. We reviewed several use cases for molecular subtyping, highlighting their promise as clinical biomarkers. Finally, we conclude that data are currently insufficient to support the routine use of molecular subtyping to guide bladder cancer management, an opinion shared with the majority of conference attendees. We also conclude that molecular subtype should not be considered an "intrinsic" property of a tumor but should instead be considered the result of a specific laboratory test, performed using a specific testing platform and classification algorithm, validated for a specific clinical application.

[1]  Mauro A. A. Castro,et al.  FOXA1 repression drives lineage plasticity and immune heterogeneity in bladder cancers with squamous differentiation , 2022, Nature Communications.

[2]  Mauro A. A. Castro,et al.  A transcriptional network of cell cycle dysregulation in noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[3]  M. Höglund,et al.  The Lund molecular taxonomy applied to non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. , 2022, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[4]  R. J. Gooding,et al.  Immunohistochemical Assays for Bladder Cancer Molecular Subtyping: Optimizing Parsimony and Performance of Lund Taxonomy Classifiers , 2022, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[5]  Mauro A. A. Castro,et al.  Stage-stratified molecular profiling of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer enhances biological, clinical, and therapeutic insight , 2021, Cell reports. Medicine.

[6]  R. J. Gooding,et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic implications of a three‐antibody molecular subtyping algorithm for non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer , 2021, The journal of pathology. Clinical research.

[7]  Y. Lotan,et al.  Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer with Nonluminal Subtype Derive Greatest Benefit from Platinum Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2021, The Journal of urology.

[8]  Y. Allory,et al.  Multilayer spectrum of intratumoral heterogeneity in basal bladder cancer , 2021, The Journal of pathology.

[9]  Jeffrey S. Damrauer,et al.  Identification of a Novel Inflamed Tumor Microenvironment Signature as a Predictive Biomarker of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Immunotherapy in Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer , 2021, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  M. Höglund,et al.  Different responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in urothelial carcinoma molecular subtypes , 2021, medRxiv.

[11]  N. Malats,et al.  An integrated multi-omics analysis identifies prognostic molecular subtypes of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer , 2021, Nature Communications.

[12]  S. Groshen,et al.  Prognostic markers in pT3 bladder cancer: A study from the international bladder cancer tissue microarray project. , 2021, Urologic oncology.

[13]  J. S. Pedersen,et al.  Molecular correlates of cisplatin-based chemotherapy response in muscle invasive bladder cancer by integrated multi-omics analysis , 2020, Nature Communications.

[14]  Mauro A. A. Castro,et al.  Identification of Differential Tumor Subtypes of T1 Bladder Cancer. , 2020, European urology.

[15]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Assessment of Luminal and Basal Phenotypes in Bladder Cancer , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[16]  U. Capitanio,et al.  Impact of Molecular Subtyping and Immune Infiltration on Pathological Response and Outcome Following Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. , 2020, European urology.

[17]  Y. Allory,et al.  Pure Large Nested Variant of Urothelial Carcinoma (LNUC) Is the Prototype of an FGFR3 Mutated Aggressive Urothelial Carcinoma with Luminal-Papillary Phenotype , 2020, Cancers.

[18]  D. Grignon,et al.  Report From the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consultation Conference On Molecular Pathology Of Urogenital Cancers. II. Molecular Pathology of Bladder Cancer , 2020, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[19]  M. Höglund,et al.  Molecular changes during progression from nonmuscle invasive to advanced urothelial carcinoma , 2019, International journal of cancer.

[20]  U. Capitanio,et al.  Updated Results of PURE-01 with Preliminary Activity of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Carcinoma with Variant Histologies. , 2019, European urology.

[21]  A. Ravaud,et al.  Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant atezolizumab in operable urothelial carcinoma in the ABACUS trial , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[22]  Tomoharu Sugie,et al.  Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration , 2019, Histopathology.

[23]  J. Raman,et al.  Mitotic activity in noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma: its value in predicting tumor recurrence and comparison with the contemporary 2-tier grading system. , 2019, Human pathology.

[24]  J. Raman,et al.  Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Bladder Cancer by Molecular Subtypes and Histologic Variants. , 2019, European urology.

[25]  Mauro A. A. Castro,et al.  A Consensus Molecular Classification of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer , 2019, European urology.

[26]  S. Tomlins,et al.  Targeted DNA and RNA Sequencing of Paired Urothelial and Squamous Bladder Cancers Reveals Discordant Genomic and Transcriptomic Events and Unique Therapeutic Implications. , 2018, European urology.

[27]  L. Mariani,et al.  Pembrolizumab as Neoadjuvant Therapy Before Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma (PURE-01): An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Study. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  E. Davicioni,et al.  Divergent Biological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  G. Chebil,et al.  Low Frequency of Intratumor Heterogeneity in Bladder Cancer Tissue Microarrays , 2018, Bladder cancer.

[30]  M. Höglund,et al.  Discordant molecular subtype classification in the basal-squamous subtype of bladder tumors and matched lymph-node metastases , 2018, Modern Pathology.

[31]  N. Gaisa,et al.  Progression of urothelial carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder: a switch from luminal to basal phenotype and related therapeutic implications , 2018, Virchows Archiv.

[32]  M. Höglund,et al.  A validation and extended description of the Lund taxonomy for urothelial carcinoma using the TCGA cohort , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[33]  R. Bourgon,et al.  TGF-β attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells , 2018, Nature.

[34]  Olivia Alder,et al.  Genomic Subtypes of Non-invasive Bladder Cancer with Distinct Metabolic Profile and Female Gender Bias in KDM6A Mutation Frequency. , 2017, Cancer cell.

[35]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer , 2017, Cell.

[36]  J. Warrick Clinical Significance of Histologic Variants of Bladder Cancer. , 2017, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[37]  K. Hoadley,et al.  Impact of Molecular Subtypes in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer on Predicting Response and Survival after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. , 2017, European urology.

[38]  M. Höglund,et al.  Molecular classification of urothelial carcinoma: global mRNA classification versus tumour‐cell phenotype classification , 2017, The Journal of pathology.

[39]  Y. Lotan,et al.  Guideline of guidelines: non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer , 2017, BJU international.

[40]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Gene Expression Profile of the Clinically Aggressive Micropapillary Variant of Bladder Cancer. , 2016, European urology.

[41]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Luminal and Basal Subtypes of Bladder Cancer and the Identification of Signature Immunohistochemical Markers for Clinical Use , 2016, EBioMedicine.

[42]  Lisle E. Mose,et al.  Claudin-low bladder tumors are immune infiltrated and actively immune suppressed. , 2016, JCI insight.

[43]  S. Selph,et al.  Treatment of muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review , 2016, Cancer.

[44]  R. Bernards,et al.  ERBB2 Mutations Characterize a Subgroup of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancers with Excellent Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. , 2016, European urology.

[45]  Roland L Dunbrack,et al.  Defects in DNA Repair Genes Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. , 2015, European urology.

[46]  M. Fernö,et al.  A Molecular Pathologic Framework for Risk Stratification of Stage T1 Urothelial Carcinoma. , 2015, European urology.

[47]  M. Höglund,et al.  Biological determinants of bladder cancer gene expression subtypes , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[48]  A. Zlotta,et al.  Molecular and clinical support for a four-tiered grading system for bladder cancer based on the WHO 1973 and 2004 classifications , 2015, Modern Pathology.

[49]  J. Aguado,et al.  Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Infection Following Intravesical BCG Administration as Adjunctive Therapy For Bladder Cancer , 2014, Medicine.

[50]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Somatic ERCC2 mutations correlate with cisplatin sensitivity in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[51]  Xavier Paoletti,et al.  EGFR as a potential therapeutic target for a subset of muscle-invasive bladder cancers presenting a basal-like phenotype , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[52]  Katherine A. Hoadley,et al.  Intrinsic subtypes of high-grade bladder cancer reflect the hallmarks of breast cancer biology , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  K. Baggerly,et al.  Identification of distinct basal and luminal subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with different sensitivities to frontline chemotherapy. , 2014, Cancer cell.

[54]  S. Barni,et al.  Correlation of pathologic complete response with survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder cancer treated with cystectomy: a meta-analysis. , 2014, European urology.

[55]  Per-Uno Malmström,et al.  Multicenter validation of cyclin D1, MCM7, TRIM29, and UBE2C as prognostic protein markers in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. , 2013, The American journal of pathology.

[56]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.

[57]  Mårten Fernö,et al.  A Molecular Taxonomy for Urothelial Carcinoma , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[58]  Raj Persad,et al.  A review of current guidelines and best practice recommendations for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer by the International Bladder Cancer Group. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[59]  D. Penson,et al.  Invasive T1 bladder cancer: indications and rationale for radical cystectomy , 2008, BJU international.

[60]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Multiple immunofluorescence labelling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue , 2008, BMC Cell Biology.

[61]  A. Lopez‐Beltran,et al.  Prognostic Factors in Survival of Patients With Stage Ta and T1 Bladder Urothelial Tumors , 2004 .

[62]  R. Montironi,et al.  Prognostic factors in stage T1 grade 3 bladder cancer survival: the role of G1-S modulators (p53, p21Waf1, p27kip1, Cyclin D1, and Cyclin D3) and proliferation index (ki67-MIB1). , 2004, European urology.

[63]  Nicholas J Vogelzang,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[64]  K. Kihara,et al.  [Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer]. , 2001, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[65]  D. Allred,et al.  Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. , 1998, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[66]  W. Fair,et al.  The treated natural history of high risk superficial bladder cancer: 15-year outcome. , 1997, The Journal of urology.