Experimental study and numerical simulation of nitrogen-assisted SAGD in developing heavy oil reservoirs

Abstract The presence of significant amounts of injected steam and heat loss are unavoidable issues occurred that are observed during the steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process in developing heavy oil reservoirs. Because of these limitations and concerns, non-condensable gas co-injection has become a potential technique to enhancing oil recovery and reducing energy consumption. However, the oil production mechanism is complicated and has not been totally understood, thereby requiring further discussion. In this work, a two-dimensional physical model was designed to investigate the production mechanisms of nitrogen on SAGD. Two comparative injection schemes, specifically the conventional SAGD and nitrogen assisted SAGD (NA-SAGD), were conducted to investigate the effect of nitrogen co-injection with steam on the SAGD performance. Dynamic temperature profile changes during the two experiment processes were monitored and recorded. The observation results indicate that nitrogen accumulation at the upper part of the model resulted in the effective expansion of the NA-SAGD process steam chamber along the horizontal direction. The swept area of steam increased significantly and the residual oil saturation was reduced. The cumulative oil production of NA-SAGD was higher than that of the conventional SAGD. Moreover, the apparent heat loss reduction, which defines the heat utilization efficiency, exhibited an increase following nitrogen injection. In addition, a numerical simulation was generated to compare and verify the results obtained in the two experiments. Nitrogen co-injection with steam effectively enhanced the oil recovery. Studies indicate that NA-SAGD is a feasible method for improving oil production in developing heavy oil reservoirs.

[1]  Xinkui Wang,et al.  Noncondensable Gas Distribution in SAGD Chambers , 2011 .

[2]  Zhangxin Chen,et al.  Analysis of steam–solvent–bitumen phase behavior and solvent mass transfer for improving the performance of the ES-SAGD process , 2015 .

[3]  R. Butler,et al.  The Steam and Gas Push (SAGP)-2:Mechanism Analysis and Physical Model Testing , 2000 .

[4]  Roger M. Butler,et al.  Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage: Concept, Development, Performance And Future , 1994 .

[5]  Yang Liu,et al.  Impact of Non-Condensable Gas on SAGD Performance , 2012 .

[6]  X. Li,et al.  Experimental study and numerical simulation of a solvent-assisted start-up for SAGD wells in heavy oil reservoirs , 2017 .

[7]  Yang Wang,et al.  Mechanism and Feasibility Study of Nitrogen Assisted Cyclic Steam Stimulation for Ultra-Heavy Oil Reservoir , 2013 .

[8]  Kazeem A. Lawal,et al.  Economics of steam-assisted gravity drainage for the Nigerian Bitumen deposit , 2014 .

[9]  M. Rogalski,et al.  Effect of n-alkanes on asphaltene structuring in petroleum oils. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[10]  Pengcheng Liu,et al.  Experimental study on the stability of the foamy oil in developing heavy oil reservoirs , 2013 .

[11]  B. Maini,et al.  Impact of Noncondensable Gas on Performance of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage , 2011 .

[12]  Yongrong Gao,et al.  Improving Oil Recovery by Adding N2 in SAGD Process for Super-heavy Crude Reservoir with Top-Water , 2008 .

[13]  M. Barrufet,et al.  Experimental Study of Air Injection in SAGD Chamber , 2011 .

[14]  Maria A. Barrufet,et al.  Effect on Non-condensable Gas on Solvent-Aided SAGD Processes , 2012 .

[15]  G. Beaulieu,et al.  Novel Expanding Solvent-SAGD Process "ES-SAGD" , 2003 .

[16]  T. Babadagli,et al.  Numerical simulation of heavy-oil/bitumen recovery by solvent injection at elevated temperatures , 2013 .

[17]  E. Lucas,et al.  Asphaltenes Precipitation from Crude Oil and Hydrocarbon Media , 2006 .

[18]  Wenhui Li,et al.  Experimental study and pilot test of urea- and urea-and-foam-assisted steam flooding in heavy oil reservoirs , 2015 .

[19]  B. Maini,et al.  Solubility Of Methane, Nitrogen, and Carbon Dioxide in Bitumen and Water for SAGD Modelling , 2011 .

[20]  S. Mehta,et al.  Effect of Methane Co-Injection in SAGD--Analytical and Simulation Study , 2012 .

[21]  A. Mukhametshina,et al.  Asphaltene Precipitation During Bitumen Extraction With Expanding-Solvent Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage: Effects on Pore-Scale Displacement , 2016 .

[22]  Daoyong Yang,et al.  Pressure maintenance and improving oil recovery with immiscible CO2 injection in thin heavy oil reservoirs , 2013 .

[23]  Daoyong Yang,et al.  Determination of Diffusion Coefficient for Alkane Solvent–CO2 Mixtures in Heavy Oil with Consideration of Swelling Effect , 2016 .

[24]  Anjani Kumar,et al.  Modelling of Non-Condensable gas Injection In SAGD Process - Important Mechanisms And Their Impact On Field Scale Simulation Models , 2015 .

[25]  M. Ahmadloo,et al.  Experimental investigation of combined electromagnetic heating and solvent-assisted gravity drainage for heavy oil recovery , 2017 .

[26]  B. Hascakir.  How to select the right solvent for solvent-aided steam injection processes , 2016 .

[27]  O. Torsæter,et al.  A Comparative Field-Scale Simulation Study on Feasibility of SAGD and ES-SAGD Processes in Naturally Fractured Bitumen Reservoirs , 2013 .

[28]  Cheng Wang,et al.  Laboratory Study on Steam and Nitrogen Co-injection for Mid-deep Heavy Oil Reservoirs , 2015 .

[29]  Mridul Kumar,et al.  New Insights Into Steam/Solvent-Coinjection-Process Mechanism , 2013 .

[30]  R. Butler,et al.  Steam and Gas Push (SAGP)-3;Recent Theoretical Developments and Laboratory Results , 2000 .

[31]  B. Maini,et al.  Multicomponent Solvent Co-injection with Steam in Heavy and Extra-Heavy Oil Reservoirs , 2016 .