Does Urban Living Influence Baby Boomers' Travel Behavior?

The authors compare the travel behavior of urban versus suburban baby boomers in the Boston metropolitan area. Using propensity score matching to attempt to control for self-selection and data from two surveys implemented in 2008 and 2010, they find that the urban boomers tend to be less automobile-dependent than suburban baby boomers. Urban baby boomers also make more recreational non-motorized transport (NMT), social, utilitarian and transit commute trips. Most of these differences seem to be primarily a result of the urban setting, not the particular preferences of boomers living in urban settings. The authors find very small self-selection effects on automobile commuting, recreational NMT, and utilitarian trips: one to seven percent of observed influence. They also find some evidence that Baby Boomers' preference for social activities tends to be mismatched to their environments - suburban boomers want more social opportunities than their settings enable. For public transport, they find a relatively large self-selection effect, 0.43 percent of observed influence, suggesting a transit-oriented boomer market segment exists.

[1]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  Examining the Impacts of Residential Self‐Selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings , 2009 .

[2]  Marco Caliendo,et al.  Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  G Giuliano.  LAND USE AND TRAVEL PATTERNS AMONG THE ELDERLY , 2004 .

[4]  Andrew V. Wister,et al.  The Importance of Transportation and Prioritization of Environmental Needs to Sustain Well-Being among Older Adults , 2001 .

[5]  Alessandro Maffioli,et al.  A Primer for Applying Propensity-Score Matching , 2010 .

[6]  B. Sianesi,et al.  PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing , 2003 .

[7]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies , 2008 .

[8]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[9]  Jae Seung Lee,et al.  Safely active mobility for urban baby boomers: The role of neighborhood design. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  G. Ridgeway,et al.  Neighborhood design and walking trips in ten U.S. metropolitan areas. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  M. Ravallion.  Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs , 2005 .

[12]  Michael G.H. Bell,et al.  Estimating Trip Generation of Elderly and Disabled People: Analysis of London Data , 2005 .

[13]  Yingling Fan,et al.  Exploring the connections among residential location, self-selection, and driving: Propensity score matching with multiple treatments , 2010 .

[14]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  Neighborhood Design and the Accessibility of the Elderly: An Empirical Analysis in Northern California , 2010 .

[15]  P. C. Zegras,et al.  Behaviorally-Based Transportation Greenhouse Gas Mitigation under the Clean Development Mechanism: The Case of Transport-Efficient Development in Nanchang, China , 2009 .

[16]  James J Heckman,et al.  A Note on Adapting Propensity Score Matching and Selection Models to Choice Based Samples , 2009, The econometrics journal.

[17]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  Exploring Causal Effects of Neighborhood Type on Walking Behavior Using Stratification on the Propensity Score , 2010 .

[18]  L. Bailey,et al.  AGING AMERICANS: STRANDED WITHOUT OPTIONS , 2004 .

[19]  Yingling Fan,et al.  Exploring the Connections Among Residential Location, Self-selection, and Driving: A Propensity Score Matching Approach , 2010 .

[20]  P. C. Zegras,et al.  Behavior-Based Transportation Greenhouse Gas Mitigation under the Clean Development Mechanism , 2009 .

[21]  Nancy McGuckin,et al.  Impact of Baby Boomers on U.S. Travel, 1969 to 2009 , 2012 .

[22]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[23]  Comparative Study of Baby Boomers’ Travel Behavior and Residential Preferences in Age-Restricted and Typical Suburban Neighborhoods , 2008 .

[24]  B. Reimer,et al.  Family Matter , 2007 .

[25]  S. Rosenbloom,et al.  OLDER TRAVELERS: DOES PLACE OR RACE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? , 2001 .

[26]  Christopher Zegras,et al.  By Community or Design? Age-restricted Neighbourhoods, Physical Design and Baby Boomers’ Local Travel Behaviour in Suburban Boston, US , 2012 .

[27]  Martin Wachs.  Transportation for the Elderly: Changing Lifestyles, Changing Needs , 1979 .