The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?

Background: It is well documented that the results of most behavioral and health promotion studies have not been translated into practice.Purpose: In this article, reasons for this gap, focusing on study design characteristics as a central contributing barrier, are discussed.Methods: Four reviews of recent controlled studies in work sites, health care, school, and community settings are briefly discussed and summarized. Their implications for future research and for closing the gap between research and practice are then discussed.Results: These reviews come to consistent conclusions regarding key internal and external validity factors that have and have not been reported. It is very clear that moderating variables and generalization issues have not been included or reported in the majority of investigations, and that as a consequence little is known about the representatives or the robustness of results from current studies.Conclusions: To significantly improve the current state of affairs, substantial changes will be required on the part of researchers, funding agencies, and review and editorial boards. In conclusion, recommendations for each of these entities are provided.

[1]  M. Brewer,et al.  Research Design and Issues of Validity , 2000 .

[2]  D Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Annals of internal medicine.

[3]  B. Flay.  Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. , 1986, Preventive medicine.

[4]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[5]  P. Greenwald,et al.  The new emphasis in cancer control. , 1985, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  Russell E. Glasgow,et al.  Work Site Health Promotion Research: To what Extent can we Generalize the Results and what is Needed to Translate Research to Practice? , 2003, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[7]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[8]  A. Dobson,et al.  Disease impact number and population impact number: population perspectives to measures of risk and benefit. , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Patricia J. Jordan,et al.  The Behavior Change Consortium: setting the stage for a new century of health behavior-change research. , 2002, Health education research.

[10]  A R Hinman,et al.  Developing the Guide to Community Preventive Services--overview and rationale. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  M. Frommer,et al.  Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[12]  J. Sallis,et al.  Health promotion research and the diffusion and institutionalization of interventions. , 1999, Health education research.

[13]  Lisa M Klesges,et al.  Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings: a review of recent reports with emphasis on external validity. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  J. Hollis,et al.  Implementation and effectiveness of a brief smoking-cessation intervention for hospital patients. , 2000, Medical care.

[15]  C. Basch,et al.  Avoiding Type III Errors in Health Education Program Evaluations: A Case Study , 1985, Health education quarterly.

[16]  S. Syme,et al.  Promoting Health: Intervention Strategies from Social and Behavioral Research , 2001 .

[17]  J. Hollis,et al.  A Smoking-Cessation Intervention for Hospital Patients , 1993, Medical care.

[18]  Improving the transition from basic efficacy research to effectiveness studies: Methodological issues and procedures. , 1995 .

[19]  R. Collins,et al.  Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, I: clinical trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[20]  Paul A. Estabrooks,et al.  Evaluating the impact of behavioral interventions that target physical activity: issues of generalizability and public health. , 2003 .

[21]  David Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials (Reprinted from JAMA 2001;285:1987-1991) , 2001 .

[22]  S. Bull,et al.  Response to Connelly. Response from the Behavior Change Consortium Representativeness and Translation Work Group: the issue is one of impact, not of world view or preferred approach , 2002 .

[23]  D. Mook,et al.  In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .

[24]  Paul A Estabrooks,et al.  Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results? , 2004, Health promotion international.

[25]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Review of primary care-based physical activity intervention studies: effectiveness and implications for practice and future research. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[26]  E. McGlynn,et al.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Smoking cessation interventions among hospitalized patients: what have we learned? , 2001, Preventive medicine.

[28]  M K Campbell,et al.  Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion. , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  J F Sallis,et al.  The effects of a 2-year physical education program (SPARK) on physical activity and fitness in elementary school students. Sports, Play and Active Recreation for Kids. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[30]  R. Heller,et al.  A population perspective to evidence based medicine: “evidence for population health” , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[31]  Lisa M Klesges,et al.  Reporting of validity from school health promotion studies published in 12 leading journals, 1996-2000. , 2003, The Journal of school health.

[32]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[33]  Evelyn P Whitlock,et al.  Evidence-based behavioral medicine: What is it and how do we achieve it? , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[34]  R. Glasgow,et al.  The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[35]  D. Stryer,et al.  Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. , 2003, JAMA.

[36]  W. Applegate,et al.  A randomized trial comparing aerobic exercise and resistance exercise with a health education program in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The Fitness Arthritis and Seniors Trial (FAST). , 1997, JAMA.

[37]  C. McBride,et al.  Promoting smoking abstinence in pregnant and postpartum patients: a comparison of 2 approaches. , 2001, The American journal of managed care.

[38]  J. Sallis,et al.  Health Behavior Research: The Quality of the Evidence Base , 2000, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[39]  P. Corso,et al.  The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.