Virtual farmland: Grasping the occupation of agricultural land by non-agricultural land uses

Abstract Planners and decision-makers entitled for rural land use planning seem to be challenged by the growing multidimensional nature of rural areas. The emergence of non-agricultural land uses in land allocated for agriculture is an important aspect of this multidimensional nature of rural areas. The overall goal of this study is to map and better understand unplanned land uses taking place within the agricultural territory allocated by spatial policy in Flanders (northern region of Belgium). We used a two-staged methodology. First, by a GIS analysis on official datasets, parcels allocated as farmland but without a registered agricultural use, were identified as being part of an information gap. The results indicate that 15% of the statutory agricultural area is not factually used for agriculture. Next, using orthophotographs and Google Streetview images, we identified for six representative municipalities the actual land uses taking place parcels with an inconsistently determined land use. The fraction of 15% was then further differentiated into apparent farmland (33%), domestic gardens (36.3%) and nonagricultural economic activities (5.5%). Based on the in-depth survey, it can be estimated that over 10% of the statutory farmland in Flanders is not farmland in reality. Based on these results, the paper introduces the concept ‘virtual farmland’ as statutory agricultural land with non-agricultural land uses. This concept is applicable elsewhere and can be a powerful concept to theorize and make progress in monitoring the so far little known occupation of statutory agricultural land by unplanned nonagricultural land uses. Especially in regions with a strong competition for land, the quantification of virtual farmland provides a scientific basis to weigh and to integrate different spatial claims.

[1]  J. Primdahl,et al.  Porous landscapes : The case of Greater Copenhagen , 2008 .

[2]  J. Primdahl,et al.  Globalisation and Agricultural Landscapes: Change Patterns and Policy trends in Developed Countries , 2010 .

[3]  M. Antrop Why landscapes of the past are important for the future , 2005 .

[4]  H. Gulinck,et al.  Putting domestic gardens on the agenda using empirical spatial data: The case of Flanders , 2014 .

[5]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  Changing land use in the countryside: Stakeholders’ perception of the ongoing rural planning processes in Flanders , 2013 .

[6]  S. Kristensen,et al.  Farmers as initiators and farms as attractors for non-agricultural economic activities in peri-urban areas in Denmark , 2007 .

[7]  Wim Devos,et al.  The harmonised data model for assessing Land Parcel Identification Systems compliance with requirements of direct aid and agri-environmental schemes of the CAP. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  E. Andersen,et al.  Intersecting Dynamics of Agricultural Structural Change and Urbanisation within European Rural Landscapes: Change Patterns and Policy Implications , 2013 .

[9]  R. Scalenghe,et al.  Soil is brown gold in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy , 2014 .

[10]  R. Goetgeluk,et al.  New Firms in Former Farms: A Process with Two Faces , 2003 .

[11]  A. M. Hersperger,et al.  Inventorying human-made objects: A step towards better understanding land use for multifunctional planning in a periurban Swiss landscape , 2012 .

[12]  G. Xie,et al.  Agricultural trade and virtual land use: The case of China's crop trade , 2013 .

[13]  V. Beckmann,et al.  Governing farmland conversion: Comparing China with the Netherlands and Germany , 2009 .

[14]  Wim Devos,et al.  Data model for the collaboration between land administration systems and agricultural land parcel identification systems. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  A. Reenberg,et al.  Land system changes in the context of urbanisation: Examples from the peri-urban area of Greater Copenhagen , 2006 .

[16]  Karin Haldrup,et al.  Indicator scarcity on cadastre and land registration in cross-country information sources , 2013 .

[17]  J. Orshoven,et al.  Tare land in Flemish horticulture , 2010 .

[18]  Hans Leinfelder,et al.  Underrated transformations in the open space—The case of an urbanized and multifunctional area , 2010 .

[19]  J. D. Ploeg The virtual farmer : past, present, and future of the Dutch peasantry , 2003 .

[20]  J. A. Allan,et al.  Virtual Water: A Strategic Resource Global Solutions to Regional Deficits , 1998 .

[21]  G. Fry Multifunctional landscapes - towards transdisciplinary research , 2001 .

[22]  R. Slee From countrysides of production to countrysides of consumption? , 2005, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[23]  S. Graham,et al.  Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice , 1999 .

[24]  G. Anstey Unplanned rural living and its policy implications: some findings from Bundaberg, Australia. , 2009 .

[25]  E. Koomen,et al.  Open-space preservation in the Netherlands: Planning, practice and prospects , 2008 .

[26]  M. Kuffer,et al.  Urban morphology of unplanned settlements: the use of spatial metrics in VHR remotely sensed images , 2011 .

[27]  J. Dessein,et al.  Perceptions of a small farming community on land use change and a changing countryside: A case-study from Flanders , 2015 .

[28]  Thomas Koellner,et al.  Virtual land use and agricultural trade: Estimating environmental and socio-economic impacts , 2006 .

[29]  Wil Zonneveld,et al.  Spatial Planning in the Network Society-Rethinking the Principles of Planning in the Netherlands , 2000 .

[30]  Hubert Gulinck,et al.  PASTURE FOR HORSES: AN UNDERESTIMATED LAND USE CLASS IN AN URBANIZED AND MULTIFUNCTIONAL AREA , 2011 .

[31]  M. Pérez-Soba,et al.  A rural typology for strategic European policies , 2012 .

[32]  Eva Kerselaers Participatory development of a land value assessment tool for agriculture to support rural planning in Flanders , 2012 .

[33]  J. Duke,et al.  Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process , 2002 .

[34]  G. Huylenbroeck,et al.  The Relationship between Farm Succession and Farm Assets on Belgian Farms , 2008 .

[35]  Regine Berges,et al.  Horsekeeping and the peri-urban development in the Berlin Metropolitan Region , 2013 .

[36]  P. Healey Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times , 2006 .

[37]  Patsy Healey,et al.  Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society , 1998 .

[38]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  Prioritising land to be preserved for agriculture: A context-specific value tree , 2011 .

[39]  E. Rogge,et al.  How to visualise the invisible: Revealing re-use of rural buildings by non-agricultural entrepreneurs in the region of Roeselare–Tielt (Belgium) , 2012 .

[40]  Marc Antrop,et al.  Landscape change : Plan or chaos? , 1998 .

[41]  Jacob H.P. van der Vaart,et al.  Towards a new rural landscape: consequences of non-agricultural re-use of redundant farm buildings in Friesland , 2005 .

[42]  Gérald Domon,et al.  An assessment of ordinary landscapes by an expert and by its residents: Landscape values in areas of intensive agricultural use , 2009 .