Recruitment difficulties in a home telecare trial

We analysed the difficulties encountered in recruiting predominantly older patients, suffering from an acute exacerbation of a chronic illness, to a randomized controlled trial of home telecare. Of 653 patients approached for study participation, after full assessment, 80% (519) met the trial eligibility criteria. Of these, 104 (20%) consented to study participation and 415 (80%) refused. A logistic regression model was constructed to examine independent effects of patient factors on probability of trial participation. Only two independent variables were associated with decreased likelihood of consent: increasing age (1 year older: odds ratio [OR] = 0.96); and being on inhaled steroid medication (OR = 0.60). The most common reason for refusal to participate, accounting for almost one-third of respondents, was a stated preference for a face-to-face nurse visiting service rather than a telecare service. Perhaps home telecare services should continue to be targeted at the more stable chronically ill population and not at those suffering from acute illness.

[1]  J. Morse Determining Sample Size , 2000 .

[2]  P. Wallace,et al.  Can telemedicine be used to improve communication between primary and secondary care? , 1996, BMJ.

[3]  Carl May,et al.  Remote Doctors and Absent Patients: Acting at a Distance in Telemedicine? , 2003 .

[4]  Paul Wallace,et al.  Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[5]  A. MacFarlane,et al.  Telemedicine services in the Republic of Ireland: an evolving policy context. , 2006, Health policy.

[6]  A. Louis,et al.  A systematic review of telemonitoring for the management of heart failure , 2003, European journal of heart failure.

[7]  P Jacklin,et al.  Joint teleconsultations (virtual outreach) versus standard outpatient appointments for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[8]  T. L. Williams,et al.  Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  P. Whitten,et al.  Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  L. Anderson,et al.  Recruiting from the community: lessons learned from the diabetes care for older adults project. , 1995, The Gerontologist.

[11]  R M Angus,et al.  “Hospital at home” versus hospital care in patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prospective randomised controlled trial , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  A. Hendricks,et al.  Patient recruitment to a randomized clinical trial of behavioral therapy for chronic heart failure , 2004, BMC medical research methodology.

[13]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  A qualitative study of the educational potential of joint teleconsultations at the primary-secondary care interface , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  A. Haycox,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Home Telecare , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[15]  P Pop,et al.  Effectiveness of joint consultation sessions of general practitioners and orthopaedic surgeons for locomotor-system disorders , 1995, The Lancet.

[16]  D. Hailey,et al.  Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[17]  F. Mair,et al.  Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[18]  F. Mair,et al.  Why are patients in clinical trials of heart failure not like those we see in everyday practice? , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  J. Judge,et al.  Factors Affecting Sample Selection in a Randomized Trial of Balance Enhancement: The FICSIT Study , 1996, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.