Good to Great: Build strong and vital teams

This empirical study explores the linkages between team conflict, climate, and team effectiveness in research team context. Questionnaire data are collected from research team leaders and members of Chinese universities, and the conceptual model is tested using structural equation modeling method. The findings provide practical implications for managing team conflict in a constructive confrontation approach and stimulating team effectiveness. Research team leaders should reduce the intensity of their emotional reactions to avoid relationship conflict and engage in task conflict to become more effective problem solvers. When every member of the team is engaged in an environment with a free expression of ideas and encourages risk taking, the group as a whole is productive. Unresolved conflict eats up productivity, walking a mile in another’s shoes is helpful for team members to understand others, thus facilitating mutual understanding and mutual trust to create a harmonious team climate.

[1]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[2]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[3]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[4]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[5]  K. Jehn ENHANCING EFFECTIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF VALUE‐BASED INTRAGROUP CONFLICT , 1994 .

[6]  Michael A. West,et al.  The social psychology of innovation in groups. , 1990 .

[7]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation in top management teams , 1996 .

[8]  H. Barkema,et al.  Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  The Effects of Top Management Team Size and interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict , 1997 .

[10]  Robert Loo,et al.  Assessing team climate by qualitative and quantitative approaches , 2004 .

[11]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Social Network Analysis to Evaluate an Interdisciplinary Research Center , 2007 .

[13]  Allen C. Amason Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[14]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[15]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[16]  K. Sanders,et al.  Solidarity through networks: The effects of task and informal interdependence on cooperation within teams , 2007 .

[17]  Claus W. Langfred The Downside of Self-Management: A Longitudinal Study of the Effects tf Conflict on Trust, Autonomy, and Task Interdependence in Self-Managing Teams , 2007 .

[18]  van de Evert Vliert,et al.  Using Conflict in Organizations , 1997 .

[19]  Natalia Juristo Juzgado,et al.  Towards understanding the relationship between team climate and software quality—a quasi-experimental study , 2008, Empirical Software Engineering.

[20]  Michael A. West,et al.  Individual, Climate, and Group Interaction Processes as Predictors of Work Team Innovation , 1995 .

[21]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[22]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams , 2001 .

[23]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[24]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Conflict Management and Team Effectiveness in China: The Mediating Role of Justice , 2002 .

[25]  J. S. Long,et al.  Organizational Context and Scientific Productivity , 1981 .

[26]  K. Jehn A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[27]  Gro Ellen Mathisen,et al.  A Review of Instruments Assessing Creative and Innovative Environments Within Organizations , 2004 .

[28]  S. Jackson,et al.  Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications , 2003 .

[29]  Leon Mann,et al.  The Innovation Imperative , 2001 .

[30]  N. Anderson,et al.  Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory , 1998 .

[31]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[33]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[34]  K. Jehn A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[35]  Jesús Rey-Rocha,et al.  Research productivity of scientists in consolidated vs. non-consolidated teams: The case of Spanish university geologists , 2002, Scientometrics.

[36]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.