Graph Minors: XV. Giant Steps

Abstract Let G be a graph with a subgraph H drawn with high representativity on a surface Σ . When can the drawing of H be extended “up to 3-separations” to a drawing of G in Σ if we permit a bounded number ( κ say) of “vortices” in the drawing of G , that is, local areas of non-planarity? (The case κ =0 was studied in the previous paper of this series.) For instance, if there is a path in G with ends in H , far apart, and otherwise disjoint from H , then no such extension exists. We are concerned with the converse; if no extension exists, what can we infer about G ? It turns out that either there is a path as above, or one of two other obstructions is present.

[1]  Paul D. Seymour,et al.  Graph Minors .XIV. Extending an Embedding , 1995, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B.

[2]  Paul D. Seymour,et al.  Graph Minors. XI. Circuits on a Surface , 1994, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B.

[3]  Paul D. Seymour,et al.  Graph minors. X. Obstructions to tree-decomposition , 1991, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B.

[4]  Paul D. Seymour,et al.  Graph Minors .XII. Distance on a Surface , 1995, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B.

[5]  Paul D. Seymour,et al.  Graph minors. IX. Disjoint crossed paths , 1990, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B.