Influence of Local Demography on Asymptotic and Transient Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Metapopulation

Despite recent advances in biodemography and metapopulation ecology, we still have limited understanding of how local demographic parameters influence short‐ and long‐term metapopulation dynamics. We used long‐term data from 17 local populations, along with the recently developed methods of matrix metapopulation modeling and transient sensitivity analysis, to investigate the influence of local demography on long‐term (asymptotic) versus short‐term (transient) dynamics of a yellow‐bellied marmot metapopulation in Colorado. Both long‐ and short‐term dynamics depended primarily on a few colony sites and were highly sensitive to changes in demography at these sites, particularly in survival of reproductive adult females. Interestingly, the relative importance of sites differed between long‐ and short‐term dynamics; the spatial structure and local population sizes, while insignificant for asymptotic dynamics, were influential on transient dynamics. However, considering the spatial structure was uninformative about the relative influence of local demography on metapopulation dynamics. The vital rates that were the most influential on local dynamics were also the most influential on both long‐ and short‐term metapopulation dynamics. Our results show that an explicit consideration of local demography is essential for a complete understanding of the dynamics and persistence of spatially structured populations.

[1]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  Population viability analyses in conservation planning : an overview , 2004 .

[2]  Philip W. Hedrick,et al.  Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations: Genetic population structure in desert bighorn sheep: implications for conservation in Arizona , 2000 .

[3]  Michel Baguette,et al.  The classical metapopulation theory and the real, natural world: a critical appraisal , 2004 .

[4]  D. Brito,et al.  Patch relative importance to metapopulation viability: the neotropical marsupial Micoureus demerarae as a case study , 2002 .

[5]  Hal Caswell,et al.  ESTIMATING POPULATION PROJECTION MATRICES FROM MULTI-STAGE MARK-RECAPTURE DATA , 2002 .

[6]  D. V. Vuren,et al.  A 32-year demography of yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris) , 1998 .

[7]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Application of Stochastic Patch Occupancy Models to Real Metapopulations , 2004 .

[8]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology , 2001, Naturwissenschaften.

[10]  K. Armitage,et al.  Genetic Variation in Social Mammals: The Marmot Model , 1980, Science.

[11]  Birgit Müller,et al.  A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models , 2006 .

[12]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  SPOMSIM: software for stochastic patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics , 2004 .

[13]  C. Pfister,et al.  Local Population Dynamics in Metapopulation Models: Implications for Conservation , 2001 .

[14]  L. Crowder,et al.  LIFE HISTORIES AND ELASTICITY PATTERNS: PERTURBATION ANALYSIS FOR SPECIES WITH MINIMAL DEMOGRAPHIC DATA , 2000 .

[15]  N. Perrin,et al.  The contribution of patch topology and demographic parameters to population viability analysis predictions: the case of the European tree frog , 2006, Population Ecology.

[16]  M. Conroy,et al.  Analysis and Management of Animal Populations , 2002 .

[17]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Cooperative breeding in marmots , 1999 .

[18]  T. Benton,et al.  Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[19]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape , 2000, Nature.

[20]  Will F. Figueira,et al.  Defining patch contribution in source-sink metapopulations: the importance of including dispersal and its relevance to marine systems , 2009, Population Ecology.

[21]  Oscar E. Gaggiotti,et al.  Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations , 2004 .

[22]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Model complexity and population predictions. The alpine marmot as a case study , 2002 .

[23]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[24]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[25]  D. Driscoll.  How to find a metapopulation , 2007 .

[26]  Kenneth B. Armitage,et al.  Seasonal Changes in Weights of Marmots , 1976 .

[27]  H. Akçakaya.  Population Viability Analyses with Demographically and Spatially Structured Models , 2004 .

[28]  George Oster,et al.  The growth and structure of human populations , 1972 .

[29]  Karin Frank,et al.  Metapopulation Persistence in Heterogeneous Landscapes: Lessons about the Effect of Stochasticity , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[30]  Janusz Uchmański,et al.  Individual variability and population regulation: a model of the significance of within-generation density dependence , 2002, Oecologia.

[31]  James D. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATES OF MOVEMENT AND SITE FIDELITY USING MARK-RESIGHT DATA OF WINTERING CANADA GEESE' , 1991 .

[32]  L. Fahrig.  How much habitat is enough , 2001 .

[33]  K. Armitage,et al.  YELLOW-BELLIED MARMOT POPULATION DYNAMICS: DEMOGRAPHIC MECHANISMS OF GROWTH AND DECLINE , 2004 .

[34]  Paul Beier,et al.  Determining Minimum Habitat Areas and Habitat Corridors for Cougars , 1993 .

[35]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-Based Models and Approaches in Ecology , 1992 .

[36]  Madan K. Oli,et al.  Relative importance of avian life-history variables to population growth rate , 2006 .

[37]  D. O. Logofet.  Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2002 .

[38]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Time, transients and elasticity. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[39]  J. Simon,et al.  Extinction rates. , 1996, Science.

[40]  O. Gaggiotti,et al.  Metapopulation biology: past, present, and future , 2004 .

[41]  Andrew D. Taylor,et al.  Empirical Evidence for Metapopulation Dynamics , 1997 .

[42]  H. Kroon,et al.  ELASTICITIES: A REVIEW OF METHODS AND MODEL LIMITATIONS , 2000 .

[43]  B. Murray,et al.  Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations: The metapopulation paradigm: a fragmented view of conservation biology , 2000 .

[44]  C. Horvitz,et al.  HURRICANE DISTURBANCE AND THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF A TROPICAL UNDERSTORY SHRUB: MEGAMATRIX ELASTICITY ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[45]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  A Habitat‐Based Metapopulation Model of the California Gnatcatcher , 1997 .

[46]  M. Oli,et al.  The Relative Importance of Life‐History Variables to Population Growth Rate in Mammals: Cole’s Prediction Revisited , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[47]  N. Schtickzelle,et al.  Local population dynamics are important to the conservation of metapopulations in highly fragmented landscapes , 2003 .

[48]  S. Harrison,et al.  Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation , 1991 .

[49]  K. Armitage.  SOCIAL AND POPULATION DYNAMICS OF YELLOW-BELLIED MARMOTS: Results from Long-Term Research , 1991 .

[50]  Kimberly G. Smith,et al.  Metapopulations and wildlife conservation , 1997 .

[51]  James P. Gibbs,et al.  Metapopulations and Wildlife Conservation , 1997 .

[52]  L. Gerber,et al.  The use of demographic sensitivity analysis in marine species conservation planning , 2004 .

[53]  Evert Meelis,et al.  Management perspectives for populations of the eurasian badger (Meles meles) in a fragmented landscape , 1991 .

[54]  E. Leigh,et al.  Tropical forest remnants: Edited by W.F. Laurance and R.O. Bieiregaard, Jr University of Chicago Press, 1997. £83.95/$ 105.00 hbk, £30.50/$38.00 pbk (632 pages) ISBN 0 226 46898 4 / 0 226 46899 2 , 1997 .

[55]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Elasticity: The Relative Contribution of Demographic Parameters to Population Growth Rate , 1986 .

[56]  C. Hunter,et al.  The use of the vec-permutation matrix in spatial matrix population models , 2005 .

[57]  J. Gurevitch,et al.  Population Numbers Count: Tools for Near‐Term Demographic Analysis , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[58]  D. V. Vuren,et al.  Survival of dispersing and philopatric yellow-bellied marmots: what is the cost of dispersal? , 1994 .

[59]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Long‐Term Dynamics in a Metapopulation of the American Pika , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[60]  G. E. Svendsen.  Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population , 1974 .

[61]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  How much does an individual habitat fragment contribute to metapopulation dynamics and persistence? , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[62]  Arpat Ozgul,et al.  Spatiotemporal variation in survival rates: implications for population dynamics of yellow-bellied marmots. , 2006, Ecology.

[63]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Effects of patch quality and network structure on patch occupancy dynamics of a yellow-bellied marmot metapopulation. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[64]  S. Harrison,et al.  Long-distance dispersal and colonization in the Bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis , 1989 .

[65]  H. Caswell.  PROSPECTIVE AND RETROSPECTIVE PERTURBATION ANALYSES: THEIR ROLES IN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY , 2000 .

[66]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Long-term persistence of species and the SLOSS problem. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[67]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  CAPTURE-RECAPTURE STUDIES FOR MULTIPLE STRATA INCLUDING NON-MARKOVIAN TRANSITIONS , 1993 .

[68]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Spotted owl metapopulation dynamics in Southern California , 1994 .

[69]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes , 2005 .

[70]  John Sabo,et al.  Morris, W. F., and D. F. Doak. 2003. Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA , 2003 .

[71]  Larry B. Crowder,et al.  Predicting the impact of Turtle Excluder Devices on loggerhead sea turtle populations , 1994 .

[72]  B. Thompson,et al.  Wild mammals of North America : biology, management, and conservation , 2003 .

[73]  J. Grand,et al.  Population Momentum: Implications for Wildlife Management , 2006 .

[74]  K. Armitage.  Reproductive Strategies of Yellow-Bellied Marmots: Energy Conservation and Differences between the Sexes , 1998 .

[75]  Tomasz Wyszomirski,et al.  Modelling the role of social behavior in the persistence of the alpine marmot Marmota marmota , 2003 .

[76]  K. Armitage,et al.  Demography of Yellow‐Bellied Marmont Populations , 1974 .

[77]  A. Grant,et al.  Elasticity analysis as an important tool in evolutionary and population ecology. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[78]  D. Doak,et al.  Book Review: Quantitative Conservation biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability analysis , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[79]  E. Matthysen.  Density-dependent dispersal in birds and mammals , 2005 .

[80]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  The Metapopulation Approach, Its History, Conceptual Domain, and Application to Conservation , 1997 .

[81]  Jonathan M. Yearsley.  Transient population dynamics and short-term sensitivity analysis of matrix population models , 2004 .

[82]  H. Caswell.  Sensitivity analysis of transient population dynamics. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[83]  M. Baguette,et al.  Resource and habitat patches, landscape ecology and metapopulation biology: a consensual viewpoint , 2004 .

[84]  C. Pfister,et al.  Patterns of variance in stage-structured populations: evolutionary predictions and ecological implications. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.