Photosystem II Subunit S overexpression increases the efficiency of water use in a field-grown crop

Insufficient water availability for crop production is a mounting barrier to achieving the 70% increase in food production that will be needed by 2050. One solution is to develop crops that require less water per unit mass of production. Water vapor transpires from leaves through stomata, which also facilitate the influx of CO2 during photosynthetic assimilation. Here, we hypothesize that Photosystem II Subunit S (PsbS) expression affects a chloroplast-derived signal for stomatal opening in response to light, which can be used to improve water-use efficiency. Transgenic tobacco plants with a range of PsbS expression, from undetectable to 3.7 times wild-type are generated. Plants with increased PsbS expression show less stomatal opening in response to light, resulting in a 25% reduction in water loss per CO2 assimilated under field conditions. Since the role of PsbS is universal across higher plants, this manipulation should be effective across all crops.Availability of irrigation water will be an increasing barrier to global crop yield increases. Here the authors show transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing Photosystem II Subunit S have less stomatal opening in response to light and a 25% reduction in water loss per CO2 assimilated under replicated field trials.

[1]  W. Bilger,et al.  Relationships among violaxanthin deepoxidation, thylakoid membrane conformation, and nonphotochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching in leaves of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) , 1994, Planta.

[2]  T. Lawson,et al.  Diurnal Variation in Gas Exchange: The Balance between Carbon Fixation and Water Loss1[OPEN] , 2017, Plant Physiology.

[3]  J. Welles,et al.  Closing in on maximum yield of chlorophyll fluorescence using a single multiphase flash of sub-saturating intensity. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[4]  Xiao-Ping Li,et al.  PsbS-dependent enhancement of feedback de-excitation protects photosystem II from photoinhibition , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  D. Tilman,et al.  Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis , 1982 .

[7]  S. Assmann,et al.  Light regulation of stomatal movement. , 2007, Annual review of plant biology.

[8]  J. Briantais,et al.  The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence , 1989 .

[9]  U. Sonnewald,et al.  Small changes in the activity of chloroplastic NADP(+)-dependent ferredoxin oxidoreductase lead to impaired plant growth and restrict photosynthetic activity of transgenic tobacco plants. , 2002, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[10]  R. Reedy,et al.  Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  T. Lawson,et al.  Stomatal conductance does not correlate with photosynthetic capacity in transgenic tobacco with reduced amounts of Rubisco. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[12]  B. Kimball,et al.  Decreases in Stomatal Conductance of Soybean under Open-Air Elevation of [CO2] Are Closely Coupled with Decreases in Ecosystem Evapotranspiration12[W][OA] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[13]  M. Puma,et al.  Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade , 2017, Nature.

[14]  K. Mott,et al.  Evidence for Involvement of Photosynthetic Processes in the Stomatal Response to CO21 , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[15]  S. Long,et al.  One crop breeding cycle from starvation? How engineering crop photosynthesis for rising CO2 and temperature could be one important route to alleviation , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  A. Ruban.  Non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching : mechanism and effectiveness in 3 protection against photodamage 4 , 2016 .

[17]  K. Niyogi,et al.  PsbS-Dependent Non-Photochemical Quenching , 2014 .

[18]  M. Badger,et al.  Antisense reductions in the PsbO prot in of photosystem II leads o decreased qua tum yield but similar maximal photosynthetic rates , 2012 .

[19]  Dimah Z. Habash,et al.  Reduction in phosphoribulokinase activity by antisense RNA in transgenic tobacco: effect on CO2 assimilation and growth in low irradiance , 1995 .

[20]  R. Sharwood,et al.  Improved analysis of C4 and C3 photosynthesis via refined in vitro assays of their carbon fixation biochemistry , 2016, Journal of experimental botany.

[21]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C(3) leaves. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[22]  B. Logan,et al.  Arabidopsis Genotypes with Differing Levels of psbS Expression Differ in Photosystem II Quantum Yield, Xanthophyll Cycle Pool Size, and Aboveground Growth , 2008, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[23]  M. Stitt,et al.  A moderate decrease of plastid aldolase activity inhibits photosynthesis, alters the levels of sugars and starch, and inhibits growth of potato plants. , 1998, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[24]  Govindjee,et al.  Non-Photochemical Quenching and Energy Dissipation in Plants, Algae and Cyanobacteria , 2014, Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration.

[25]  Susanne von Caemmerer,et al.  The Contribution of Photosynthesis to the Red Light Response of Stomatal Conductance1[OA] , 2007, Plant Physiology.

[26]  A. Ruban.  Nonphotochemical Chlorophyll Fluorescence Quenching: Mechanism and Effectiveness in Protecting Plants from Photodamage1 , 2016, Plant Physiology.

[27]  David M. Kramer,et al.  New Fluorescence Parameters for the Determination of QA Redox State and Excitation Energy Fluxes , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[28]  Tracy Lawson,et al.  Mesophyll photosynthesis and guard cell metabolism impacts on stomatal behaviour. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[29]  K. Mott.  Opinion: stomatal responses to light and CO(2) depend on the mesophyll. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[30]  J. Schroeder,et al.  Carbonic anhydrases are upstream regulators of CO2-controlled stomatal movements in guard cells , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  M. Badger,et al.  Specific reduction of chloroplast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity by antisense RNA reduces CO2 assimilation via a reduction in ribulose bisphosphate regeneration in transgenic tobacco plants , 2004, Planta.

[32]  Christopher M. Brown,et al.  Quantifying the amount and activity of Rubisco in leaves. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[33]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[34]  D. Lobell,et al.  Greater Sensitivity to Drought Accompanies Maize Yield Increase in the U.S. Midwest , 2014, Science.

[35]  S. Long,et al.  Meeting the Global Food Demand of the Future by Engineering Crop Photosynthesis and Yield Potential , 2015, Cell.

[36]  Murray R. Badger,et al.  The interplay between limiting processes in C3 photosynthesis studied by rapid-response gas exchange using transgenic tobacco impaired in photosynthesis , 1998 .

[37]  E. Dreyer,et al.  Performance of a new dynamic model for predicting diurnal time courses of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[38]  T. Lawson,et al.  Reductions in mesophyll and guard cell photosynthesis impact on the control of stomatal responses to light and CO2 , 2008, Journal of experimental botany.

[39]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Improving photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection , 2016, Science.

[40]  James F. Reynolds,et al.  Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2 , 1992 .

[41]  K. Niyogi,et al.  An evaluation of new and established methods to determine T‐DNA copy number and homozygosity in transgenic plants. , 2016, Plant, cell & environment.

[42]  D. Bowling,et al.  Influence of the Mesophyll on Stomatal Opening , 1995 .

[43]  Tracy Lawson,et al.  Guard cell photosynthesis and stomatal function. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[44]  K. Niyogi,et al.  Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[45]  S. Long,et al.  Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[46]  Opinion: The red-light response of stomatal movement is sensed by the redox state of the photosynthetic electron transport chain , 2014, Photosynthesis Research.