NAL-NL2 Empirical Adjustments
暂无分享,去创建一个
Gitte Keidser | Harvey Dillon | Lyndal Carter | Anna O’Brien | H. Dillon | G. Keidser | Anna O’Brien | L. Carter
[1] Benjamin W Y Hornsby,et al. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[2] R. Plomp. Noise, Amplification, and Compression: Considerations of Three Main Issues in Hearing Aid Design , 1994, Ear and hearing.
[3] Hugh J. McDermott,et al. The Design and Evaluation of a Hearing Aid with Trainable Amplification Parameters , 2007, Ear and hearing.
[4] G Keidser,et al. Comparing Loudness Normalization (IHAFF) with Speech Intelligibility Maximization (NAL-NL1) when Implemented in a Two-Channel Device , 2001, Ear and hearing.
[5] Justin A. Zakis,et al. Preferred overall loudness. II: Listening through hearing aids in field and laboratory tests , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[6] R M Cox,et al. Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements. , 1992, Ear and hearing.
[7] M. Florentine,et al. Measures of the ecological loudness of speech , 2011 .
[8] Harvey Dillon,et al. A cross-over, double-blind comparison of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children with mild to moderately severe hearing loss , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[9] Gitte Keidser,et al. Clinical Evaluation of Australian Hearing's Guidelines for Fitting Multiple Memory Hearing Aids , 2005 .
[10] I Hochberg,et al. Most comfortable listening for the loudness and intelligibility of speech. , 1975, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[11] R Plomp,et al. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] R A Bentler,et al. An Examination of Several Characteristics that Affect the Prediction of OSPL90 in Hearing Aids , 2001, Ear and hearing.
[13] Harvey Dillon,et al. Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children: Preference in real world use , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[14] APPLICATION OF A "RELATIVE" PROCEDURE TO A PROBLEM IN BINAURAL BEAT PERCEPTION. REP 63-17. , 1963, [Report]. Civil Aeromedical Research Institute.
[15] Larry E Humes,et al. Changes in hearing-aid benefit following 1 or 2 years of hearing-aid use by older adults. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[16] C V Palmer,et al. The functionally and physiologically plastic adult auditory system. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] I. M. Ventry,et al. Most comfortable loudness for pure tones, noise, and speech. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] Harvey Dillon,et al. NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids , 1999 .
[19] P. Newall,et al. Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. , 1990, Ear and hearing.
[20] D Byrne,et al. Evaluation of the National Acoustic Laboratories' new hearing aid selection procedure. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[21] B E Walden,et al. Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[22] Gitte Keidser,et al. Variation in preferred gain with experience for hearing-aid users , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[23] T. Ching,et al. Children's speech perception and loudness ratings when fitted with hearing aids using the DSL v.4.1 and the NAL-NL1 prescriptions , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[24] R C Seewald,et al. The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] Gitte Keidser,et al. A Review and Analysis: Does Amplification Experience Have an Effect on Preferred Gain over Time? , 2005 .
[26] Gitte Keidser,et al. The preferred response slopes and two-channel compression ratios in twenty listening conditions by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners and their relationship to the acoustic input , 2005, International journal of audiology.
[27] G Keidser,et al. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[28] Gitte Keidser,et al. Client-Based Adjustments of Hearing Aid Gain: The Effect of Different Control Configurations , 2008, Ear and hearing.
[29] Jeremy Marozeau,et al. Testing the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis with hearing-impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Jeremy Marozeau,et al. Monaural and binaural loudness of 5- and 200-ms tones in normal and impaired hearing. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] Gitte Keidser,et al. The effect of the base line response on self-adjustments of hearing aid gain. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] H. Dillon,et al. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.
[33] Mary Florentine,et al. Binaural Loudness Summation for Speech and Tones Presented via Earphones and Loudspeakers , 2009, Ear and hearing.
[34] Earl E. Johnson,et al. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[36] H Levitt,et al. The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] Gitte Keidser,et al. The trainable hearing aid: What will it do for clients and clinicians? , 2006 .
[38] Sheila Moodie,et al. The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm , 2005, Trends in amplification.
[39] Gitte Keidser,et al. Derivation of the NAL-NL2 prescription procedure , 2010 .
[40] Anna K Nabelek,et al. The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[41] J. Hall,et al. Diotic loudness summation in normal and impaired hearing. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[42] Braida Ld,et al. Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987 .
[43] Directional audiometry. 3. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech in patients with monaural hearing loss. , 1971, Acta oto-laryngologica.
[44] J. Landes. Application of a J-Q Model for Fracture in the Ductile-Brittle Transition , 1997 .
[45] L D Braida,et al. Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[46] Brian C J Moore. How Much Do We Gain by Gain Control in Hearing Aids? , 1990 .
[47] Gitte Keidser,et al. Preferred low- and high-frequency compression ratios among hearing aid users with moderately severe to profound hearing loss. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[48] Harvey Dillon. What ’ s New in Prescriptive Fittings Down Under ? Gitte Keidser , .
[49] Gitte Keidser,et al. Effect of low-frequency gain and venting effects on the benefit derived from directionality and noise reduction in hearing aids , 2007, International journal of audiology.
[50] Brian C J Moore,et al. Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[51] R M Cox,et al. The Contour Test of Loudness Perception , 1997, Ear and hearing.
[52] C W Turner,et al. The Time Course of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1997, Ear and hearing.
[53] Wouter A. Dreschler,et al. The Effects of Syllabic Compression and Frequency Shaping on Speech Intelligibility in Hearing , 1994, Ear and hearing.
[54] Robyn M. Cox,et al. Using Loudness Data for Hearing Aid Selection: The IHAFF Approach , 1995 .
[55] P. Dermody,et al. Loudness Summation with Binaural Hearing Aids , 1975 .
[56] Wouter A Dreschler,et al. Audiologist-Driven Versus Patient-Driven Fine Tuning of Hearing Instruments , 2012, Trends in amplification.