Effect of salt mixture concentration on fractionation with NF membranes

Desal-5 DK, NF 270, NF (Dow), NF 20 and ESNA-1-LF nanofiltration membranes were tested for their selectivity, when single and mixed salt solutions (NaCl, NaCl:Na2SO4 1:1 ratio) of different concentrations were filtered at a constant permeate flux. Streaming potential measurements were used to characterise the new NF 20 (Sepro) and NF (Dow) membranes. The membrane surface charge increased the retentions when dilute salt solutions were filtered. The best selectivity was generally achieved using low permeate fluxes and high salt concentrations. At higher salt concentrations the charge effects were diminished. Negative NaCl retention values were obtained for all but the ESNA-1-LF membrane, when concentrated mixed salt solutions were filtered. The use of higher permeate fluxes increased salt retentions in general. The measured isoelectric points (IP) for the NF (Dow) and the NF 20 (Sepro) membranes were 5.1 and 6.6, respectively. Owing to the close proximity of the IP of the NF 20 membrane to the filtration conditions, the effect of the surface charge on the separation was limited and salt fractionation was efficient at all tested salt concentrations. Of the studied membranes, the NF (Dow) and the Desal-5 DK showed the best selectivity. According to the salt retention data, the ESNA-1-LF membrane should not be considered a nanofiltration membrane, but rather a slightly open reverse osmosis membrane.

[1]  A. Pihlajamäki,et al.  Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements , 1994 .

[2]  S. Bhattacharjee,et al.  Coupled model of concentration polarization and pore transport in crossflow nanofiltration , 2001 .

[3]  Victor M.M. Lobo,et al.  Handbook of electrolyte solutions , 1989 .

[4]  G. Hagmeyer,et al.  Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values , 1998 .

[5]  M. Nyström,et al.  Separation of ions in acidic conditions using NF , 2002 .

[6]  J. M. Dickson,et al.  Permeation of mixed-salt solutions with commercial and pore-filled nanofiltration membranes: membrane charge inversion phenomena , 2004 .

[7]  Mika Mänttäri,et al.  Critical flux in NF of high molar mass polysaccharides and effluents from the paper industry , 2000 .

[8]  A. Barr Sulphate removal by nanofiltration , 2001 .

[9]  Abdul Wahab Mohammad,et al.  Characterization and Prediction of Nanofiltration Membrane Performance—A General Assessment , 1998 .

[10]  Frederick George Donnan,et al.  Theory of membrane equilibria and membrane potentials in the presence of non-dialysing electrolytes. A contribution to physical-chemical physiology , 1995 .

[11]  P. Jaouen,et al.  Mechanism of nitrate ions transfer in nanofiltration depending on pressure, pH, concentration and medium composition , 2004 .

[12]  E. R. Nightingale,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL THEORY OF ION SOLVATION. EFFECTIVE RADII OF HYDRATED IONS , 1959 .

[13]  H. Neomagus,et al.  Salt rejection in nanofiltration for single and binary salt mixtures in view of sulphate removal , 2005 .

[14]  James M. Dickson,et al.  Mathematical modeling of nanofiltration membranes with mixed electrolyte solutions , 2004 .

[15]  Andrea I. Schäfer,et al.  Nanofiltration: Principles and Applications , 2004 .

[16]  Shoji Kimura,et al.  Reverse Osmosis of Single and Mixed Electrolytes with Charged Membranes: Experiment and Analysis , 1991 .

[17]  M. Nyström,et al.  Long-term acid resistance and selectivity of NF membranes in very acidic conditions , 2004 .

[18]  A. Pihlajamäki Electrochemical Characterisation of Filter Media Properties and Their Exploitation in Enhanced Filtration , 1998 .

[19]  Masaaki Ando,et al.  Separation performance of a nanofiltration membrane influenced by species and concentration of ions , 2005 .

[20]  S. Bandini,et al.  Donnan equilibrium and dielectric exclusion for characterization of nanofiltration membranes , 2002 .

[21]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Effects of natural organic matter and ionic species on membrane surface charge. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Biofouling potential of various NF membranes with respect to bacteria and their soluble microbial products (SMP): Characterizations, flux decline, and transport parameters , 2005 .

[23]  Remko M. Boom,et al.  Nanofiltration of multi-component feeds. Interactions between neutral and charged components and their effect on retention , 2005 .

[24]  David Hasson,et al.  Utilization of the Donnan effect for improving electrolyte separation with nanofiltration membranes , 1996 .

[25]  S. Nakao,et al.  Negative rejection of anions in the loose reverse osmosis separation of mono- and divalent ion mixtures , 1991 .

[26]  Béatrice Balannec,et al.  Comparative study of different nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dairy effluent treatment by dead-end filtration , 2005 .

[27]  Robert Rautenbach,et al.  Separation potential of nanofiltration membranes , 1990 .

[28]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  Separation of monovalent and divalent ions from aqueous solution by electrodialysis and nanofiltration. , 2004, Water research.

[29]  J. Gilron Experimental analysis of negative salt rejection in nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[30]  Abdul Wahab Mohammad,et al.  Predicting flux and rejection of multicomponent salts mixture in nanofiltration membranes , 2003 .