Attentional attraction of receptive fields can explain spatial and temporal effects of attention

A multitude of attentional effects were found at both the neural and behavioural levels of perception; however, the nature of the attentional mechanism is an unsettled issue. It is typically assumed that the fundamental impact of attention is enhancement of neuronal responses, but some attentional effects are difficult to explain by such gain modulations. Here we offer a different view: We suggest that the most fundamental impact of attention is the attraction (shift) of receptive fields towards the attended location. We further show, both conceptually and by model simulations, that this attraction of receptive fields can explain a diverse range of attentional effects, spatial as well as temporal, linking physiological measurements at the unit level with psychophysical observations (e.g., enhanced contrast sensitivity, enhanced spatial resolution, the Mexican-hat profile of attention, prolonged perceived duration, prior entry, degraded temporal resolution).

[1]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Receptive Field Shift and Shrinkage in Macaque Middle Temporal Area through Attentional Gain Modulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  D. LaBerge Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  R. Desimone,et al.  Attention Increases Sensitivity of V4 Neurons , 2000, Neuron.

[7]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Perceived duration of expected and unexpected stimuli , 2006, Psychological research.

[8]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perception , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual Prior Entry , 2001, Psychological science.

[11]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Attention Reshapes Center-Surround Receptive Field Structure in Macaque Cortical Area MT , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  M. Treisman Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock". , 1963, Psychological monographs.

[14]  S. Baldassi,et al.  Spatio-temporal templates of transient attention revealed by classification images , 2012, Vision Research.

[15]  B. Kerr,et al.  Processing demands during mental operations , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[16]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Linda V. Heinemann,et al.  Exploring BOLD Changes during Spatial Attention in Non-Stimulated Visual Cortex , 2009, PloS one.

[18]  Richard G. F. Visser,et al.  Meiosis Drives Extraordinary Genome Plasticity in the Haploid Fungal Plant Pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola , 2009, PloS one.

[19]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  The effects of transient attention on spatial resolution and the size of the attentional cue , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Effects of Attention on the Processing of Motion in Macaque Middle Temporal and Medial Superior Temporal Visual Cortical Areas , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Notger G. Müller,et al.  The attentional ‘spotlight's’ penumbra: center-surround modulation in striate cortex , 2004, Neuroreport.

[22]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  The selective tuning model of attention: psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item , 2003, Vision Research.

[23]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Spatial Attention Modulates Center-Surround Interactions in Macaque Visual Area V4 , 2009, Neuron.

[24]  B McElree,et al.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R. Klein,et al.  Relations among modes of visual orienting , 2000 .

[26]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The interaction between stimulus-driven and goal-driven orienting as revealed by eye movements. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement , 2000, Vision Research.

[29]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[30]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Directed attention prolongs the perceived duration of a brief stimulus , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[33]  Y. Yeshurun,et al.  Transient spatial attention and the perceived duration of brief visual events , 2008 .

[34]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Visual Attention and the Semantics of Space , 2006, Psychological science.

[36]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Responses in area V4 depend on the spatial relationship between stimulus and attention. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[39]  P. Tse,et al.  Attention and the subjective expansion of time , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  Arno Villringer,et al.  A Physiological Correlate of the “Zoom Lens” of Visual Attention , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Attentional modulation of receptive field structure in area 7a of the behaving monkey. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  G A Orban,et al.  Attention-dependent suppression of metabolic activity in the early stages of the macaque visual system. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution , 2005, Vision Research.

[44]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[45]  J T Enns,et al.  The Role of Attention in Temporal Integration , 2001, Perception.

[46]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Common and differential effects of attentive fixation on the excitability of parietal and prestriate (V4) cortical visual neurons in the macaque monkey , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[47]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[48]  Rufin van Rullen,et al.  A feedback model of attentional effects in the visual cortex , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium On Computational Intelligence For Multimedia, Signal And Vision Processing.

[49]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[50]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Shifter circuits: a computational strategy for dynamic aspects of visual processing. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Francesca C. Fortenbaugh,et al.  Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[52]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[53]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[54]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Spatial Summation Can Explain the Attentional Modulation of Neuronal Responses to Multiple Stimuli in Area V4 , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Y. Yeshurun Isoluminant stimuli and red background attenuate the effects of transient spatial attention on temporal resolution , 2004, Vision Research.

[56]  Joonyeol Lee,et al.  A Normalization Model of Attentional Modulation of Single Unit Responses , 2009, PloS one.

[57]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[58]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[60]  Y. Yeshurun,et al.  Transient Spatial Attention Degrades Temporal Resolution , 2003, Psychological science.

[61]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST , 1996, Nature.

[62]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Visual attention and temporal discrimination: Differential effects of automatic and voluntary cueing , 2006 .

[63]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  A new form of human spatial attention: Automated symbolic orienting , 2012 .

[64]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[66]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[67]  Francesca C. Fortenbaugh,et al.  Rapid changes in visual-spatial attention distort object shape , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[68]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Does attention impair temporal discrimination? Examining non-attentional accounts , 2007, Psychological research.

[69]  David C. Burr,et al.  Impulse-response functions for chromatic and achromatic stimuli , 1993 .

[70]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Modeling Visual Attention via Selective Tuning , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[71]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[72]  Ewart A. C. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive processing and time perception , 1975 .

[73]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[74]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Tuning curve shift by attention modulation in cortical neurons: a computational study of its mechanisms. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[75]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[76]  K. Linnell,et al.  The interacting effect of load and space on visual selective attention , 2009 .

[77]  G. Boynton Attention and visual perception , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[78]  John Duncan,et al.  The demonstration of capacity limitation , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[79]  M. Carrasco,et al.  A population-coding model of attention’s influence on contrast response: Estimating neural effects from psychophysical data , 2009, Vision Research.

[80]  J T Enns,et al.  The duration of a brief event in the mind's eye. , 1999, The Journal of general psychology.

[81]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Spatial Attention Effects in Macaque Area V4 , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[82]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Effects of spatial attention on contrast response functions in macaque area V4. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[83]  D. Heeger,et al.  The Normalization Model of Attention , 2009, Neuron.

[84]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations , 2005, Vision Research.