Ultrasonic assessment of cortical bone thickness in vitro and in vivo

In osteoporosis, total bone mass decreases and the thickness of the cortical layer diminishes in the shafts of the long bones. In this study, a simple ultrasonic in vivo method for determining the thickness of the cortical bone layer was applied, and the suitability of two different signal analysis techniques, i.e., envelope and cepstral methods, for measuring cortical thickness was compared. The values of cortical thickness, as determined with both techniques, showed high linear correlations (r ges 0.95) with the thickness values obtained from in vitro measurements with a caliper or in vivo measurements by peripheral quantitative CT (pQCT). No systematic errors that could be related to the cortical thickness were found. The in vivo accuracy of the measurements was 6.6% and 7.0% for the envelope and cepstral methods, respectively. Further, the in vivo precision for the envelope and cepstral methods was 0.26 mm and 0.28 mm, respectively. Although the results are similar for both of the techniques, the simplicity of the envelope method makes it more attractive for clinical applications. In conclusion, a simple ultrasound measurement provides an accurate estimate of the cortical bone thickness. The techniques investigated may have clinical potential for osteoporosis screening and therefore warrant more extensive clinical investigations with healthy and osteoporotic individuals.

[1]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Bone Fragility: Failure of Periosteal Apposition to Compensate for Increased Endocortical Resorption in Postmenopausal Women , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  K. Wear,et al.  Autocorrelation and cepstral methods for measurement of tibial cortical thickness , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  D. Hans,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound of the Tibia Depends on Both Cortical Density and Thickness , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[4]  M. Brodt,et al.  Accuracy of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) for assessing area and density of mouse cortical bone. , 2003, Calcified tissue international.

[5]  H. Sievänen,et al.  Analyzing cortical bone cross-sectional geometry by peripheral QCT: comparison with bone histomorphometry. , 2007, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[6]  S. Cheng,et al.  Ultrasound Velocity and Cortical Bone Characteristics In Vivo , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[7]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[8]  R Stern,et al.  Measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in the human femur in vivo. , 1980, Medical physics.

[9]  P Zioupos,et al.  Changes in the stiffness, strength, and toughness of human cortical bone with age. , 1998, Bone.

[10]  H. Rico,et al.  Cortical Bone Resorption in Osteoporosis , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[11]  P. Moilanen,et al.  Assessment of the tibia in prepubertal girls using ultrasonic guided waves , 2002 .

[12]  E. Chérin,et al.  Evaluation of acoustical parameter sensitivity to age-related and osteoarthritic changes in articular cartilage using 50-MHz ultrasound. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  M. Greenfield,et al.  Measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in human cortical bone and its potential clinical importance. An in vivo preliminary study. , 1973, Investigative radiology.

[14]  H K Genant,et al.  Accuracy of cortical and trabecular bone measurements with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Maryline Talmant,et al.  Comparison of three ultrasonic axial transmission methods for bone assessment. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound: Assessment of Osteoporosis and Bone Status , 1999 .

[17]  D.P. Skinner,et al.  The cepstrum: A guide to processing , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[18]  S. Singh Ultrasonic non-destructive measurements of cortical bone thickness in human cadaver femur. , 1989, Ultrasonics.

[19]  A. Noll Cepstrum pitch determination. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R C Chivers,et al.  Ultrasonic velocity and attenuation in mammalian tissues. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  L. Claes,et al.  Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  A. M. Parfitt,et al.  Age-related structural changes in trabecular and cortical bone: Cellular mechanisms and biomechanical consequences , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[23]  D. Bauer,et al.  Cortical PQCT Measures Are Associated With Fractures in Dialysis Patients , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[24]  P. Guy,et al.  Accuracy of pQCT for evaluating the aged human radius: an ashing, histomorphometry and failure load investigation , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[25]  R Stern,et al.  Measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in human cortical bone in vivo. Estimation of its potential value in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease. , 1981, Radiology.

[26]  A. Hosokawa,et al.  Ultrasonic wave propagation in bovine cancellous bone. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.