Modeling Streams and Hydrogeomorphic Attributes in Oregon From Digital and Field Data 1

Managers, regulators, and researchers of aquatic ecosystems are increasingly pressed to con- sider large areas. However, accurate stream maps with geo-referenced attributes are uncommon over relevant spatial extents. Field inventories provide high-quality data, particularly for habitat characteristics at fine spatial resolutions (e.g., large wood), but are costly and so cover relatively small areas. Recent avail- ability of regional digital data and Geographic Information Systems software has advanced capabilities to delineate stream networks and estimate coarse-resolution hydrogeomorphic attributes (e.g., gradient). A spa- tially comprehensive coverage results, but types of modeled outputs may be limited and their accuracy is typically unknown. Capitalizing on strengths in both field and regional digital data, we modeled a syn- thetic stream network and a variety of hydrogeomorphic attributes for the Oregon Coastal Province. The synthetic network, encompassing 96,000 km of stream, was derived from digital elevation data. We used high-resolution but spatially restricted data from field inventories and streamflow gauges to evaluate, cali- brate, and interpret hydrogeomorphic attributes modeled from digital elevation and precipitation data. The attributes we chose to model (drainage area, mean annual precipitation, mean annual flow, probability of perennial flow, channel gradient, active-channel width and depth, valley-floor width, valley-width index, and valley constraint) have demonstrated value for stream research and management. For most of these attributes, field-measured, and modeled values were highly correlated, yielding confidence in the mod- eled outputs. The modeled stream network and attributes have been used for a variety of purposes, includ- ing mapping riparian areas, identifying headwater streams likely to transport debris flows, and characterizing the potential of streams to provide high-quality habitat for salmonids. Our framework and models can be adapted and applied to areas where the necessary field and digital data exist or can be obtained.

[1]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[2]  Pi-Hui Huang,et al.  Automated suitable drainage network extraction from digital elevation models in Taiwan's upstream watersheds , 2006 .

[3]  Timothy J. Beechie,et al.  Modeling Stream Channel Characteristics From Drainage‐Enforced DEMs in Puget Sound, Washington, USA 1 , 2007 .

[4]  R. Edwards The Hyporheic Zone , 1998 .

[5]  Robin J Wyatt,et al.  Mapping the abundance of riverine fish populations: integrating hierarchical Bayesian models with a geographic information system (GIS) , 2003 .

[6]  P. B. King,et al.  Geologic map of Oregon , 1969 .

[7]  E. Steel,et al.  Lost Watersheds: Barriers, Aquatic Habitat Connectivity, and Salmon Persistence in the Willamette and Lower Columbia River Basins , 2006 .

[8]  P. Jackson,et al.  BANKFULL DISCHARGE RECURRENCE INTERVALS AND REGIONAL HYDRAULIC GEOMETRY RELATIONSHIPS: PATTERNS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, USA 1 , 2001 .

[9]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  Water In Environmental Planning , 1978 .

[10]  S. K. Jenson,et al.  Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information-system analysis , 1988 .

[11]  C. Murray,et al.  Physicochemical Characteristics of the Hyporheic Zone Affect Redd Site Selection by Chum Salmon and Fall Chinook Salmon in the Columbia River , 2002 .

[12]  T. Nickelson A Habitat-Based Assessment of Coho Salmon Production Potential and Spawner Escapement Needs for Oregon Coastal Streams , 1998 .

[13]  C. Baxter,et al.  Geomorphology, hyporheic exchange, and selection of spawning habitat by bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) , 2000 .

[14]  K. Burnett,et al.  Comparison of Digital Elevation Models for Aquatic Data Development , 2003 .

[15]  F. Swanson,et al.  An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian ZonesFocus on links between land and water , 1991 .

[16]  E. George Robison,et al.  Oregon Department of Forestry Storm Impacts and Landslides of 1996: Final Report , 1999 .

[17]  J. Richardson,et al.  Progress towards understanding the structure, function, and ecological significance of small stream channels and their riparian zones , 2003 .

[18]  B. Hicks The influence of geology and timber harvest on channel morphology and salmonid populations in Oregon coast range streams , 1989 .

[19]  W. Hansen Identifying stream types and management implications , 2001 .

[20]  D. Tarboton A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models , 1997 .

[21]  Kirk L. Krueger,et al.  Accuracy and Precision of Stream Reach Water Surface Slopes Estimated in the Field and from Maps , 1999 .

[22]  Regional scale analysis of the altimetric stream network evolution , 2006 .

[23]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian Zones , 2007 .

[24]  T. Spies,et al.  Cumulative ecological and socioeconomic effects of forest policies in coastal Oregon. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[25]  James J. Anderson,et al.  Historical Population Structure of Central Valley Steelhead and Its Alteration by Dams , 2006 .

[26]  Lisa M. Ganio,et al.  A geostatistical approach for describing spatial pattern in stream networks , 2005 .

[27]  P. Roni Habitat Use by Fishes and Pacific Giant Salamanders in Small Western Oregon and Washington Streams , 2002 .

[28]  David G. Hankin,et al.  Estimating Total Fish Abundance and Total Habitat Area in Small Streams Based on Visual Estimation Methods , 1988 .

[29]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Landscape characteristics, land use, and coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) abundance, Snohomish River, Wash., U.S.A. , 2002 .

[30]  Jerry E. Mueller,et al.  PROBLEMS IN THE DEFINITION AND MEASUREMENT OF STREAM LENGTH , 1979 .

[31]  J. Gallant,et al.  A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas , 2003 .

[32]  Daniel J. Miller,et al.  Distribution of salmon-habitat potential relative to landscape characteristics and implications for conservation. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[33]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications , 1953 .

[34]  Alan K. Zundel,et al.  Improved Process for Floodplain Delineation from Digital Terrain Models , 2003 .

[35]  J. Gerhard,et al.  Influence of constitutive model parameters on the predicted migration of DNAPL in heterogeneous porous media , 2003 .

[36]  Steven G. Paulsen,et al.  Designing a Spatially Balanced, Randomized Site Selection Process for Regional Stream Surveys: The EMAP Mid-Atlantic Pilot Study , 2000 .

[37]  R. Lunetta,et al.  GIS-based evaluation of salmon habitat in the Pacific Northwest , 1997 .

[38]  B. Cade,et al.  Influences of spatial and temporal variation on fish-habitat relationships defined by regression quantiles , 2002 .

[39]  David M. Mark,et al.  Relations Between Field-surveyed Channel Networks and Map-based Geomorphometric Measures, Inez, Kentucky , 1983 .

[40]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel type and salmonid spawning distribution and abundance , 1999 .

[41]  Daniel J. Miller,et al.  Streamside Policies for Headwater Channels: An Example Considering Debris Flows in the Oregon Coastal Province , 2007 .

[42]  Klement Tockner,et al.  A landscape perspective of surface-subsurface hydrological exchanges in river corridors , 2002 .

[43]  Ellen Wohl,et al.  Prediction of mountain stream morphology , 2005 .

[44]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Erosion of steepland valleys by debris flows , 2006 .

[45]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins , 1997 .

[46]  T. Lisle,et al.  (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/rra.693 CONTROLS ON THE SIZE AND OCCURRENCE OF POOLS IN , 2022 .

[47]  A. Porporato,et al.  A note on groundwater flow along a hillslope , 2004 .

[48]  T. Spies,et al.  A hierarchical spatial framework for forest landscape planning , 2005 .

[49]  G. Reeves,et al.  Comparing Riparian and Catchment Influences on Stream Habitat in a Forested, Montane Landscape , 2006 .

[50]  K. Young Riparian Zone Management in the Pacific Northwest: Who's Cutting What? , 2000 .

[51]  Miles A. Hemstrom,et al.  Simulating riparian vegetation and aquatic habitat dynamics in response to natural and anthropogenic disturbance regimes in the Upper Grande Ronde River, Oregon, USA , 2007 .

[52]  Daniel N. Miller,et al.  Confluence effects in rivers: Interactions of basin scale, network geometry, and disturbance regimes , 2004 .

[53]  K. Burnett Relationships among juvenile anadromous salmonids, their freshwater habitat, and landscape characteristics over multiple years and spatial scales in the Elk River, Oregon , 2001 .

[54]  M. Gordon Wolman,et al.  Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology , 1965 .

[55]  P. Lawson Identification of historical populations of Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in the Oregon coast evolutionarily significant unit , 2007 .

[56]  M. Bryant,et al.  Salmonids on the Fringe: Abundance, Species Composition, and Habitat Use of Salmonids in High-Gradient Headwater Streams, Southeast Alaska , 2004 .

[57]  D. E. Busch,et al.  Effectiveness Monitoring for the Aquatic and Riparian Component of the Northwest Forest Plan : Conceptual Framework and Options , 2004 .

[58]  L. Martz,et al.  The assignment of drainage direction over flat surfaces in raster digital elevation models , 1997 .

[59]  C. Daly,et al.  A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous Terrain , 1994 .

[60]  R. Sidle,et al.  Understanding Processes and Downstream Linkages of Headwater Systems , 2002 .

[61]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Erosion thresholds and land surface morphology , 1992 .

[62]  Don L. Stevens,et al.  Spatially restricted surveys over time for aquatic resources , 1999 .

[63]  R. Ibbitt,et al.  Data for Ashley River to test channel network and river basin heterogeneity concepts , 1998 .

[64]  B. Riley,et al.  EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY , 2009 .

[65]  E. Foufoula‐Georgiou,et al.  Channel network source representation using digital elevation models , 1993 .