Integrating customers' differentiated supply valuation in distribution network planning and charging

Due to the lack of observability and controllability in current distribution networks, the traditional planning and charging framework makes the oversimplifying assumption of uniform supply valuation for every customer of the same sector and every unit of supplied energy. Building on the advanced metering and control capabilities of the emerging smart grid, this paper explores the impact of integrating the differentiated valuation of electricity supply for different customers and different levels of supplied energy in distribution network planning. Customer interruption costs are reduced, since supply interruption of customers with low supply valuation and the non-critical part of their demand is prioritized during network failures. As a result, the need for capital intensive network reinforcements is limited and the total network expenditure is reduced. Furthermore, a cost-reflective network charging scheme based on the principles of locational marginal pricing is proposed, enabling an equitable treatment of customers with differentiated supply valuation.

[1]  F. Schweppe Spot Pricing of Electricity , 1988 .

[2]  George Gross,et al.  Value of service reliability , 1990 .

[3]  D. Kirschen,et al.  Fundamentals of power system economics , 1991 .

[4]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Value-based distribution reliability assessment and planning , 1995 .

[5]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo simulation for composite power system reliability analysis with time varying loads , 1995 .

[6]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  Microeconomic Theory , 1995 .

[7]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Distributed nature of residential customer outage costs , 1996 .

[8]  K. K. Kariuki,et al.  Applications of customer outage costs in system planning, design and operation , 1996 .

[9]  B. N. Suddeth,et al.  Interruption costs, customer satisfaction and expectations for service reliability , 1996 .

[10]  K. K. Kariuki,et al.  Evaluation of reliability worth and value of lost load , 1996 .

[11]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Features that influence composite power system reliability worth assessment , 1997 .

[12]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Reliability worth of distribution system network reinforcement considering dispersed customer cost data , 1999 .

[13]  F. Alvarado,et al.  Designing incentive compatible contracts for effective demand management , 2000 .

[14]  Fernando L. Alvarado,et al.  Using utility information to calibrate customer demand management behavior models , 2002, 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309).

[15]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Fundamentals of Power System Economics: Kirschen/Power System Economics , 2005 .

[16]  E. Bompard,et al.  The Demand Elasticity Impacts on the Strategic Bidding Behavior of the Electricity Producers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  A. Vojdani,et al.  Smart Integration , 2008, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[18]  Aaron Praktiknjo,et al.  Assessing energy supply security: Outage costs in private households , 2011 .

[19]  Siripha Junlakarn,et al.  Distribution System Reliability Options and Utility Liability , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.