Low carbon transitions pathways in mobility: Applying the MLP in a combined case study and simulation bridging analysis of passenger transport in the Netherlands

Abstract The analysis addresses two critical gaps in the literature on low-carbon mobility transitions: 1) scenarios of low-carbon mobility concentrate on technological substitution and have only a limited representation of niche-regime interactions and behavioural change, and 2) detailed qualitative analysis of socio-technical transitions dynamics have limited utility in developing future projections. It applies the Multi-Level Perspective on transitions, combining case studies of mobility niches in the Netherlands with simulations of transitions pathways using the MATISSE model, by applying the bridging approach proposed by Turnheim et al. (2015a). The iterative, combined qualitative case study and quantitative simulation approach develops transition pathways including both behavioural and technological change. The results show that both technological substitution to low carbon cars or a reconfiguration pathway away from car ownership to mobility lifestyles based on new public transport or cycling and walking for local trips are possible. However, while there is empirical evidence for the initial stage of a technological substitution to battery electric vehicles, transitions away from car ownership as the dominant mobility lifestyle have to overcome an established regime and will require major changes in culture and behaviour as well as support for new priorities in the institutions of transport planning.

[1]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Exploring the implications of lifestyle change in 2 °C mitigation scenarios using the IMAGE integrated assessment model , 2016 .

[2]  Jonathan Köhler,et al.  A comparison of the neo-Schumpeterian theory of Kondratiev waves and the multi-level perspective on transitions , 2012 .

[3]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Modelling Socio-Technical Transition Patterns and Pathways , 2008, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[4]  S. Ruutu,et al.  Prospects of modelling societal transitions : position paper of an emerging community , 2015 .

[5]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[6]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[7]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[8]  L. Clarke,et al.  Assessing Transformation Pathways , 2014 .

[9]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges , 2015 .

[10]  George Papachristos,et al.  Modelling Sustainability Transitions: An Assessment of Approaches and Challenges , 2018, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[11]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[12]  Claes Andersson,et al.  Societal systems – Complex or worse? , 2014 .

[13]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A transitions model for sustainable mobility , 2009 .

[14]  K. Frenken,et al.  Evolutionary theorizing and modeling of sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[15]  Rpjm Rob Raven,et al.  Niche accumulation and hybridisation strategies in transition processes towards a sustainable energy system: An assessment of differences and pitfalls , 2007 .

[16]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for transition modelling , 2008 .

[17]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930) , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[18]  David Banister,et al.  The sustainable mobility paradigm , 2008 .

[19]  Michael Laver,et al.  Policy and the Dynamics of Political Competition , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[20]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[21]  Floortje Alkemade,et al.  Analysis of barriers in the transition toward sustainable mobility in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[22]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Socio-technical scenarios as a tool for transition policy: an example from the traffic and transport domain , 2002 .

[23]  L. Whitmarsh,et al.  A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden , 2008 .

[24]  D. Rosenbloom,et al.  Pathways: An emerging concept for the theory and governance of low-carbon transitions , 2017 .

[25]  Kees Maat,et al.  Stakeholders interests, expectations, and strategies regarding the development and implementation of electric vehicles: The case of the Netherlands , 2014 .

[26]  David Banister,et al.  Land Transport and How to Unlock Investment in Support of “Green Growth” , 2015 .

[27]  J. Hertin,et al.  Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’ , 2002 .

[28]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  Branching points for transition pathways : assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future , 2013 .

[29]  Peter S. Hofman,et al.  Exploring system innovation in the electricity system through sociotechnical scenarios , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..