Discourse Processing of First and Second Language Biology Texts: Effects of Language Proficiency and Domain‐Specific Knowledge

This article investigates the effects of graduate science students' domain-specific knowledge and language proficiency on local lexical and syntactic processing and on semantic and higher conceptual processing of biology texts written in the students' first and second language. In our research, language proficiency consistently affected lower-level processing. However, it appeared to have few concomitant effects on processing of semantic information. Domain-specific knowledge, on the other hand, affected every aspect of comprehension of semantic information that was assessed in the study. However, it had fewer effects on local lexical and syntactic processing. These results were consistent with theories of discourse comprehension that view processing of local lexical and syntactic information and processing of semantic and higher conceptual information as being both multilevel and modular. The results of the study also suggest that caution should be exercised when applying conclusions drawn from studies of languages from the Indo-European family to languages of a greater linguistic distance, such as Chinese.

[1]  Gevarter,et al.  Overview of Expert Systems , 1982 .

[2]  G. Tucker,et al.  CULTURAL ORIENTATION AND THE STUDY OF FOREIGN LITERATURE , 1971 .

[3]  Patricia Johnson,et al.  Effects on Reading Comprehension of Building Background Knowledge. , 1982 .

[4]  Elizabeth B. Bernhardt.  Reading Development in a Second Language: Theoretical, Empirical and Classroom Perspectives , 1991 .

[5]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  James F. Lee.  Background Knowledge & L2 Reading , 1986 .

[7]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Language as a Cognitive Process , 1983, CL.

[8]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[9]  Carl H Frederiksen,et al.  Representing logical and semantic structure of knowledge acquired from discourse , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  D. Mitchell,et al.  The Effects of Context and Content on Immediate Processing in Reading , 1978 .

[11]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[12]  Doris Aaronson,et al.  Sentence processing in Chinese-American bilinguals , 1986 .

[13]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  One Second of Reading. , 1972 .

[14]  F. Smith,et al.  Psycholinguistics and reading , 1973 .

[15]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[16]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension , 1979 .

[17]  Robert Pritchard,et al.  The Effects of Cultural Schemata on Reading Processing Strategies. , 1990 .

[18]  P. Carrell.  The Effects of Rhetorical Organization on ESL Readers. , 1984 .

[19]  Mervyn G. Marasinghe,et al.  SAS System for Linear Models , 1991 .

[20]  William Grabe,et al.  Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading: Reassessing the term “interactive” , 1988 .

[21]  K. Stanovich.  Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. , 1986 .

[22]  Gary A. Cziko,et al.  LANGUAGE COMPETENCE AND READING STRATEGIES: A COMPARISON OF FIRST‐AND SECOND‐LANGUAGE ORAL READING ERRORS1 , 1980 .

[23]  Mohammad M.A.H.,et al.  Factors Affecting the Successful Reading of Technical Instructions. , 1984 .

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[25]  Patricia L. Carrell,et al.  THREE COMPONENTS OF BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE IN READING COMPREHENSION , 1983 .

[26]  Joann Hammadou,et al.  Interrelationships among Prior Knowledge, Inference, and Language Proficiency in Foreign Language Reading , 1991 .

[27]  Y. Wolf,et al.  LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY, TEXT CONTENT AND ORDER EFFECTS IN NARRATIVE RECALL , 1986 .

[28]  J. Charles Alderson,et al.  Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading: This test is unfair: I'm not an economist , 1988 .

[29]  Chi Rai Chu Show.  Chinese Grammar and English Grammar a Comparative Study , 1982 .

[30]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[31]  Helena Curtis,et al.  Invitation to Biology , 1972 .

[32]  A C Graesser,et al.  Processing of new arguments at clause boundaries , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Janet Donin,et al.  The Relationship Between First‐ and Second‐Language Reading Comprehension of Occupation‐Specific Texts , 1993 .

[34]  M. Chi.  Knowledge structures and memory development. , 1978 .

[35]  K. Goodman.  Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game , 1967 .

[36]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The representation of meaning in memory , 1974 .

[37]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Recall of Text: Differences between First and Second Language Readers. , 1984 .

[38]  James G. Greeno,et al.  On The Nature of Competence: Principles for Understanding in a Domain© , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[39]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences , 1973 .

[40]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[41]  Carl H. Frederksen,et al.  Constructing Multiple Semantic Representations in Comprehending and Producing Discourse , 1991 .

[42]  M. Clarke.  The Short Circuit Hypothesis of esl Reading—or When Language Competence Interferes with Reading Performance , 1980 .

[43]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Answering questions from oceanography texts: Learner, task, and text characteristics , 1988 .

[44]  R. Lomax,et al.  Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. , 1987 .

[45]  Patricia Johnson,et al.  Effects on Reading Comprehension of Language Complexity and Cultural Background of a Text. , 1981 .

[46]  Martin G. Levine,et al.  The Effect Of Background Knowledge On The Reading Comprehension Of Second Language Learners , 1985 .

[47]  Lesgold AlanM.,et al.  Interactive processes in reading comprehension , 1978 .