The challenge of collective learning from event analysis

This paper examines the difficulties of learning from event analysis. The central idea is that learning represents a distinct set of team-or unit-level outcomes and processes that is different from valid analysis, effective problem-solving, or individual learning. In other words, event analysis cannot automatically generate group learning. For learning to occur, several conditions must be satisfied: Change in the team's or unit's repertoire of behaviors (the learning) must be a clear outcome of the event analysis; this learning must be shared by the team members (i.e., members must become aware of both the content of the learning as well as of the fact that other members are aware of this learning); the shared learning must be stored in repositories for future retrieval; the stored learning must be retrieved when the team subsequently encounters situations where the learning is relevant; and, finally, these processes of sharing, storing, and retrieving the learning must continue to occur over an extended period of time. These requirements pose major dilemmas or challenges for learning from event analysis. We discuss these challenges using examples from event analysis teams in two hospitals and in a computer emergency response center. We offer some potential strategies for addressing these challenges.

[1]  P. C. Nutt Surprising but true: Half the decisions in organizations fail , 1999 .

[2]  P. Goodman,et al.  New Forms of Work Groups: Exocentric Teams , 2003 .

[3]  R. Ramanujam,et al.  EMPLOYEE SILENCE ON CRITICAL WORK ISSUES: THE CROSS LEVEL EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE , 2008 .

[4]  Anita L. Tucker An Empirical Study of System Improvement by Frontline Employees in Hospital Units , 2007, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[5]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Making It Safe: The Effects of Leader Inclusiveness and Professional Status on Psychological Safety and Improvement Efforts in Health Care Teams , 2006 .

[6]  A. Edmondson Learning from Mistakes is Easier Said Than Done: Group and Organizational Influences on the Detection and Correction of Human Error , 1996 .

[7]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  Intelligence gathering for decision making , 2007 .

[9]  Michael R. Beauregard,et al.  The Basics of FMEA , 1996 .

[10]  Rangaraj Ramanujam,et al.  Making a Case for Organizational Change in Patient Safety Initiatives , 2005 .

[11]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[12]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[13]  C. Sirio,et al.  Reporting trends in a regional medication error data-sharing system , 2010, Health care management science.

[14]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .

[15]  Fernando Olivera,et al.  Memory Systems In Organizations: An Empirical Investigation Of Mechanisms For Knowledge Collection, Storage And Access , 2000 .

[16]  L. Argote Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[17]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .