Comparison of AnnAGNPS and SWAT model simulation results in USDA‐CEAP agricultural watersheds in south‐central Kansas

This study was conducted under the USDA-Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) in the Cheney Lake watershed in south-central Kansas. The Cheney Lake watershed has been identified as ‘impaired waters’ under Section 303(d) of the Federal Clean Water Act for sediments and total phosphorus. The USDA-CEAP seeks to quantify environmental benefits of conservation programmes on water quality by monitoring and modelling. Two of the most widely used USDA watershed-scale models are Annualized AGricultural Non-Point Source (AnnAGNPS) and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The objectives of this study were to compare hydrology, sediment, and total phosphorus simulation results from AnnAGNPS and SWAT in separate calibration and validation watersheds. Models were calibrated in Red Rock Creek watershed and validated in Goose Creek watershed, both sub-watersheds of the Cheney Lake watershed. Forty-five months (January 1997 to September 2000) of monthly measured flow and water quality data were used to evaluate the two models. Both models generally provided from fair to very good correlation and model efficiency for simulating surface runoff and sediment yield during calibration and validation (correlation coefficient; R2, from 0·50 to 0·89, Nash Sutcliffe efficiency index, E, from 0·47 to 0·73, root mean square error, RMSE, from 0·25 to 0·45 m3 s−1 for flow, from 158 to 312 Mg for sediment yield). Total phosphorus predictions from calibration and validation of SWAT indicated good correlation and model efficiency (R2 from 0·60 to 0·70, E from 0·63 to 0·68) while total phosphorus predictions from validation of AnnAGNPS were from unsatisfactory to very good (R2 from 0·60 to 0·77, E from − 2·38 to 0·32). The root mean square error–observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) was estimated as excellent (from 0·08 to 0·25) for the all model simulated parameters during the calibration and validation study. The percentage bias (PBIAS) of the model simulated parameters varied from unsatisfactory to excellent (from 128 to 3). This study determined SWAT to be the most appropriate model for this watershed based on calibration and validation results. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Mazdak Arabi,et al.  Modeling long-term water quality impact of structural BMPs , 2006 .

[2]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 , 2011 .

[3]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Return‐flow assessment for irrigation command in the Palleru river basin using SWAT model , 2005 .

[4]  Yongping Yuan,et al.  Subsurface Flow Component for AnnAGNPS , 2006 .

[5]  Philip W. Gassman,et al.  Water Quality Modeling for the Raccoon River Watershed Using SWAT , 2006 .

[6]  Vassilios A. Tsihrintzis,et al.  Modeling of non-point source pollution in a Mediterranean drainage basin , 2006 .

[7]  Ronald L. Bingner,et al.  PHOSPHORUS COMPONENT IN ANNAGNPS , 2005 .

[8]  Yongping Yuan,et al.  EVALUATION OF ANNAGNPS ON MISSISSIPPI DELTA MSEA WATERSHEDS , 2000 .

[9]  Ronald L. Bingner,et al.  Cost effectiveness of agricultural BMPs for sediment reduction in the mississippi delta , 2002 .

[10]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  CREAMS: a field scale model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems [USA] , 1980 .

[11]  Yongping Yuan,et al.  Water Quality Simulation of Rice/Crawfish Field Ponds within Annualized AGNPS , 2007 .

[12]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT , 2007 .

[13]  T. Potter,et al.  SWAT Application for Conservation Effects Assessment in the Southeastern Coastal Plain , 2005 .

[14]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Uncertainty in TMDL Models , 2006 .

[15]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Modelling hydrological response to different land‐use and climate change scenarios in the Zamu River basin of northwest China , 2008 .

[16]  Sabine Grunwald,et al.  GIS-BASED HYDROLOGIC MODELING IN THE SANDUSKY WATERSHED USING SWAT , 2005 .

[17]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[18]  Optimizing Best Management Practice Selection to Increase Cost-effectiveness , 2003 .

[19]  Barbara Baginska,et al.  Modelling nutrient transport in Currency Creek, NSW with AnnAGNPS and PEST , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[20]  B Gharabaghi,et al.  Evaluation of AnnAGNPS in cold and temperate regions. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  G. R. Foster,et al.  Predicting soil erosion by water : a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) , 1997 .

[22]  A. Sadeghi,et al.  Watershed Level BMP Evaluation with SWAT Model , 2005 .

[23]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  COMPARISON OF GREEN-AMPT AND CURVE NUMBER METHODS ON GOODWIN CREEK WATERSHED USING SWAT , 1999 .

[24]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  APPLICATION OF A WATERSHED MODEL TO EVALUATE MANAGEMENT EFFECTS ON POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION , 2001 .

[25]  J. D. Stuck,et al.  Farm-level studies of particulate phosphorus transport in the Everglades Agricultural Area , 2001 .

[26]  Ronald L. Bingner,et al.  SIMULATING EPHEMERAL GULLY EROSION IN ANNAGNPS , 2007 .

[27]  R. Young,et al.  AGNPS, Agricultural Non-Point-Source Pollution Model: a watershed analysis tool. Research report , 1987 .

[28]  A. Saleh,et al.  EVALUATION OF SWAT AND HSPF WITHIN BASINS PROGRAM FOR THE UPPER NORTH BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED IN CENTRAL TEXAS , 2004 .

[29]  P. Parajuli.  SWAT BACTERIA SUB-MODEL EVALUATION AND APPLICATION , 2007 .

[30]  John R. Williams,et al.  EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation. , 1990 .

[31]  R. Zeng,et al.  Effects of solids concentration, pH and carbon addition on the production rate and composition of volatile fatty acids in prefermenters using primary sewage sludge. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[32]  Richard G. Allen,et al.  A Penman for All Seasons , 1986 .

[33]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[34]  A. Shirmohammadi,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE SWAT MODEL’S HYDROLOGY COMPONENT IN THE PIEDMONT PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGION OF MARYLAND , 2004 .

[35]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[36]  João Rocha,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool "SWAT" , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[37]  Curtis L. Larson,et al.  Modeling infiltration during a steady rain , 1973 .

[38]  Kyle R Mankin,et al.  Source specific fecal bacteria modeling using soil and water assessment tool model. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[39]  M. Arabi,et al.  Cost‐effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm , 2006 .

[40]  Marvin E. Jensen,et al.  Operational estimates of reference evapotranspiration , 1989 .

[41]  M. Arabi,et al.  Representation of agricultural conservation practices with SWAT , 2008 .

[42]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[43]  Allen L. Thompson,et al.  Evaluating BMPs in a Claypan Watershed , 2006 .

[44]  J. Eilers,et al.  WATER QUALITY MODELING OF ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURAL SCENARIOS IN THE U.S. CORN BELT 1 , 2002 .

[45]  D. G. Sullivan,et al.  Evaluation of SWAT Manual Calibration and Input Parameter Sensitivity in the Little River Watershed , 2007 .

[46]  Maria Mimikou,et al.  Quantity and Quality Integrated Catchment Modeling under Climate Change with use of Soil and Water Assessment Tool Model , 2002 .

[47]  Stephen R. Workman,et al.  SIMULATION OF DAILY AND MONTHLY STREAM DISCHARGE FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS USING THE SWAT MODEL , 2000 .

[48]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .

[49]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS, CALIBRATION, AND VALIDATIONS FOR A MULTISITE AND MULTIVARIABLE SWAT MODEL 1 , 2005 .

[50]  R. Young,et al.  AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds , 1989 .

[51]  J. D. Eigel,et al.  Modeling Surface and Subsurface Stormflow on Steeply-Sloping Forested Watersheds , 1983 .

[52]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  APPLICATION OF SWAT FOR THE UPPER NORTH BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED , 2000 .

[53]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  HYDROLOGIC SIMULATION ON AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS: CHOOSING BETWEEN TWO MODELS , 2003 .

[54]  J. G. Arnold,et al.  PREDICTING SEDIMENT AND PHOSPHORUS LOADS IN THE ROCK RIVER BASIN USING SWAT , 2000 .

[55]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Predicting runoff from Rangeland Catchments: A comparison of two models , 1990 .

[56]  Kati W. Migliaccio,et al.  HYDROLOGIC COMPONENTS OF WATERSHED-SCALE MODELS , 2007 .

[57]  Ronald L. Bingner,et al.  Runoff and soil erosion evaluation by the AnnAGNPS model in a small mediterranean watershed , 2007 .

[58]  John R. Williams,et al.  A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity [EPIC, Erosion-Productivity Impact Calculator, mathematical models] , 1984 .

[59]  R. Bagnold.  An approach to the sediment transport problem from general physics , 1966 .

[60]  Andrew N. Sharpley,et al.  EPIC, Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator , 1990 .

[61]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[62]  B. Haggard,et al.  Comparison of two methods for modeling monthly TP yield from a watershed , 2004 .

[63]  K. Eckhardt.  How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation , 2005 .

[64]  Philip Jordan,et al.  A comparison of SWAT, HSPF and SHETRAN/GOPC for modelling phosphorus export from three catchments in Ireland. , 2007, Water research.

[65]  Christine A. Shoemaker,et al.  Cannonsville Reservoir Watershed SWAT2000 model development, calibration and validation , 2007 .

[66]  Assefa M. Melesse,et al.  Influences of Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation Methods on SWAT's Hydrologic Simulation in a Northwestern Minnesota Watershed , 2006 .

[67]  Hua-Sheng Hong,et al.  [Modelling pollutant loads and management alternatives in Jiulong River watershed with AnnAGNPS]. , 2005, Huan jing ke xue= Huanjing kexue.

[68]  R. Allen,et al.  Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Water Requirements , 1990 .

[69]  D. K. Borah,et al.  SEDIMENT AND NUTRIENT MODELING FOR TMDL DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION , 2006 .

[70]  Adel Shirmohammadi,et al.  Assessing the Performance of SWAT and AnnAGNPS Models in a Coastal Plain Watershed, Choptank River, Maryland, U.S.A. , 2007 .

[71]  P. Goel,et al.  Comparing the Performance of SWAT and AnnAGNPS Model in a Watershed in Ontario , 2007 .

[72]  D. K. Borah,et al.  WATERSHED-SCALE HYDROLOGIC AND NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION MODELS: REVIEW OF MATHEMATICAL BASES , 2003 .

[73]  R. Bagnold.  Bed load transport by natural rivers , 1977 .

[74]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration , 1999 .

[75]  Kyle R. Mankin,et al.  WATERSHED–SCALE AMC SELECTION FOR HYDROLOGIC MODELING , 2003 .

[76]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[77]  Fanghua Hao,et al.  The non-point source pollution in livestock-breeding areas of the Heihe River basin in Yellow River , 2007 .

[78]  George H. Hargreaves,et al.  Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature , 1985 .

[79]  C. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of a non-point source pollution model, AnnAGNPS, in a tropical watershed , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[80]  Kyoung Jae Lim,et al.  AUTOMATED WEB GIS BASED HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS TOOL, WHAT 1 , 2005 .

[81]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part III - The Ray catchment at Grendon Underwood , 1970 .

[82]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  GLEAMS: Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems , 1987 .

[83]  Cort J. Willmott,et al.  On the Evaluation of Model Performance in Physical Geography , 1984 .