Effect of Sweating on Electrode-Skin Contact Impedances and Artifacts in EEG Recordings With Various Screen-Printed Ag/Agcl Electrodes

In response to the growing clinico-economic need for comprehensive home-based sleep testing, we recently developed a self-applicable facial electrode set with screen-printed Ag/AgCl electrodes. Our previous studies revealed that nocturnal sweating is a common problem, causing low-frequency artifacts in the measured electroencephalography (EEG) signals. As the electrode set is designed to be used without skin abrasion, not surprisingly this leads to relatively high electrode-skin impedances, significant impedance changes due to sweating and an increased risk of sweat artifacts. However, our recent electrochemical <italic>in vitro</italic> investigations revealed that the sweat artifact tolerance of an EEG electrode can be improved by utilizing an appropriate Ag/AgCl ink. Here we have investigated <italic>in vivo</italic> electrode-skin impedances and the quality of EEG signals and interference due to sweating in the population of 11 healthy volunteers. Commercial Ag and Ag/AgCl inks (Engineered Conductive Materials ECM LLC and PPG Industries Inc.) were used to test electrode sets with differently constructed ink layers. Electrode-skin impedances and EEG signals were recorded before and after exercise-induced sweating. There was extensive variation in the electrode-skin impedances between the volunteers and the electrode positions: 14.6–200 <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{k}\Omega $ </tex-math></inline-formula> (PPG electrodes) and 7.7–200 <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{k}\Omega $ </tex-math></inline-formula> (ECM electrodes). Sweating significantly decreased (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$p< \,0.05$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) the impedances in most cases. The EEG signal quality was assessed by comparing average band powers from 0.5 to 2 Hz before and after sweating. Only slight differences existed between the ECM and PPG electrodes; however, the lowest band power ratio (<italic>i.e</italic>. the smallest increase in the band power due to sweating) was achieved with ECM electrodes.

[1]  M. Gillespie,et al.  Laboratory versus Portable Sleep Studies: A Meta‐Analysis , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  James J. S. Norton,et al.  Soft, curved electrode systems capable of integration on the auricle as a persistent brain–computer interface , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Timo Leppänen,et al.  Improved Sweat Artifact Tolerance of Screen-Printed EEG Electrodes by Material Selection-Comparison of Electrochemical Properties in Artificial Sweat , 2019, IEEE Access.

[4]  L. Geddes Electrodes and the measurement of bioelectric events , 1972 .

[5]  Isleifur Olafsson,et al.  Sleep‐related sweating in obstructive sleep apnoea: association with sleep stages and blood pressure , 2010, Journal of sleep research.

[6]  Esa Mervaala,et al.  New disposable forehead electrode set with excellent signal quality and imaging compatibility , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  W. M. Anderson,et al.  Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. , 2007, Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

[8]  Jyh-Yeong Chang,et al.  Novel Dry Polymer Foam Electrodes for Long-Term EEG Measurement , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Gen Sobue,et al.  Skin sympathetic nerve function during sleep—a study with effector responses , 2003, Autonomic Neuroscience.

[10]  A. Chesson,et al.  The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology, and Techinical Specifications , 2007 .

[11]  Yuhao Liu,et al.  Lab-on-Skin: A Review of Flexible and Stretchable Electronics for Wearable Health Monitoring. , 2017, ACS nano.

[12]  J. Rosell,et al.  Skin impedance from 1 Hz to 1 MHz , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Sanjay R. Patel,et al.  Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea: a literature-based analysis. , 2019, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[14]  S. Luck,et al.  The effects of electrode impedance on data quality and statistical significance in ERP recordings. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[15]  Guangli Li,et al.  Towards gel-free electrodes: A systematic study of electrode-skin impedance , 2017 .

[16]  Wei Gao,et al.  Flexible Electronics toward Wearable Sensing. , 2019, Accounts of chemical research.

[17]  A. Chesson,et al.  The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications , 2007 .

[18]  R C Barr,et al.  Skin‐Electrode Impedance and Its Effect on Recording Cardiac Potentials , 1966, Circulation.

[19]  Liborio Parrino,et al.  Variability in recording and scoring of respiratory events during sleep in Europe: a need for uniform standards , 2016, Journal of sleep research.

[20]  Mohamed Moshrefi-Torbati,et al.  Signal processing techniques applied to human sleep EEG signals - A review , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[21]  C. Grimbergen,et al.  Investigation into the origin of the noise of surface electrodes , 2002, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[22]  Esa Mervaala,et al.  Success Rate and Technical Quality of Home Polysomnography With Self-Applicable Electrode Set in Subjects With Possible Sleep Bruxism , 2018, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[23]  Allan I Pack,et al.  Nocturnal sweating—a common symptom of obstructive sleep apnoea: the Icelandic sleep apnoea cohort , 2013, BMJ Open.

[24]  Esa Mervaala,et al.  Screen-printed EEG electrode set for emergency use , 2014 .