Introduction: Interrogating the Right to be Forgotten
暂无分享,去创建一个
The history of the future is now written in bytes. Current and emerging information technologies are mediating and shaping the narratives we build both about ourselves as individuals and ourselves as a collective. These will eventually constitute our future memories. The diffusion of Internet-based technologies has been changing the approach that people take to accessing information, managing their data, constructing a self, establishing relationships, constructing knowledge, relating to world events, reflecting upon past events, imagining the future, and so on. To upload and retrieve information (data) on the ‘web’ has become a quotidian automatic, often automated, operation. In particular, the ease with which personal data can be disclosed and private matters exposed in public has changed people’s ideas of ‘public space’ and of ‘private space’ as well as privacy. First computers and the Internet, then mobile devices and soon any mundane object or space (Internet of Things) have all been unnoticeably blurring or even hybridising these spaces. Perhaps following the enthusiasm for the connectivity hype that heralds ‘sharing’ as a good thing, many people are now demanding the ownership and control of their data across all processing phases, including the erasure of their presence on the web.
[1] Pere Simón Castellano. The Right to Be Forgotten Under European Law: A Constitutional Debate , 2011 .
[2] Franz Werro. The Right to Inform v. The Right to be Forgotten: A Transatlantic Clash , 2009 .
[3] Norberto Nuno Gomes de Andrade. Oblivion: The Right to Be Different from Oneself - Reproposing the Right to Be Forgotten , 2012 .
[4] Jef Ausloos,et al. The 'Right to be Forgotten' - Worth remembering? , 2012, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..