Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program - GSHAP legacy

Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program - or simply GSHAP, when launched, almost two decades ago, aimed at establishing a common framework to evaluate the seismic hazard over geographical large-scales, i.e. countries, regions, continents and finally the globe. Its main product, the global seismic hazard map was a milestone, unique at that time and for a decade have served as the main reference worldwide. Today, for most of the Earth’s seismically active regions such Europe, Northern and Southern America, Central and South-East Asia, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, the GSHAP seismic hazard map is outdated. The rapid increase of the new data, advance on the earthquake process knowledge, technological progress, both hardware and software, contributed all in updates of the seismic hazard models. We present herein, a short retrospective overview of the achievements as well as the pitfalls of the GSHAP. Further, we describe the next generation of seismic hazard models, as elaborated within the Global Earthquake Model, regional programs: the 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model, the 2014 Earthquake Model for Middle East, and the 2015 Earthquake Model of Central Asia. Later, the main characteristics of these regional models are summarized and the new datasets fully harmonized across national borders are illustrated for the first time after the GSHAP completion.

[1]  Roberto Basili,et al.  Integrating geologic fault data into tsunami hazard studies , 2013 .

[2]  J. Bela Too generous to a fault? Is reliable earthquake safety a lost art? Errors in expected human losses due to incorrect seismic hazard estimates , 2014 .

[3]  B. Gutenberg,et al.  Frequency of Earthquakes in California , 1944, Nature.

[4]  Domenico Giardini,et al.  The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP) - 1992/1999 , 1999 .

[5]  Damiano Monelli,et al.  Modeling Distributed Seismicity for Probabilistic Seismic‐Hazard Analysis: Implementation and Insights with the OpenQuake Engine , 2014 .

[6]  Vladimir Kossobokov,et al.  Errors in expected human losses due to incorrect seismic hazard estimates , 2011, Natural Hazards.

[7]  Robert J. Geller,et al.  Why earthquake hazard maps often fail and what to do about it , 2012 .

[8]  W. Silva,et al.  Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relationships for Subduction Zone Earthquakes , 1997 .

[9]  Mark W. Stirling,et al.  The Continued Utility of Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Assessment , 2014 .

[10]  Domenico Giardini,et al.  Mapping Europe's Seismic Hazard , 2014 .

[11]  David M. Perkins,et al.  SEISRISK III; a computer program for seismic hazard estimation , 1987 .

[12]  G. Grünthal,et al.  The SHARE European Earthquake Catalogue (SHEEC) for the time period 1900–2006 and its comparison to the European-Mediterranean Earthquake Catalogue (EMEC) , 2013, Journal of Seismology.

[13]  BrianS-J. Chiou,et al.  An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra , 2008 .

[14]  Richard A Kerr,et al.  Seismology. Seismic crystal ball proving mostly cloudy around the world. , 2011, Science.

[15]  E. Faccioli,et al.  Broadband (0.05 to 20 s) prediction of displacement response spectra based on worldwide digital records , 2008 .

[16]  Kaye M. Shedlock,et al.  The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map , 1999 .

[17]  M. Zare,et al.  Recent developments of the Middle East catalog , 2014, Journal of Seismology.

[18]  Arthur Frankel,et al.  Comment on "Why earthquake hazard maps often fail and what to do about it" by S. Stein, R. Geller, and M. Liu , 2013 .

[19]  Roberto Basili,et al.  The European Database of Seismogenic Faults (EDSF) compiled in the framework of the Project SHARE. , 2013 .

[20]  C. Lee,et al.  Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationships for Subduction-Zone Earthquakes in Northeastern Taiwan , 2008 .

[21]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  Probabilities and Fallacies: Why Hazard Maps Cannot be Validated by Individual Earthquakes * , 2013 .

[22]  D. Bindi,et al.  Central Asia earthquake catalogue from ancient time to 2009 , 2015 .

[23]  S. Akkar,et al.  A New Procedure for Selecting and Ranking Ground-Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs): The Euclidean Distance-Based Ranking (EDR) Method , 2013 .

[24]  Peter Bormann,et al.  Public Release of the ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1900-2009) , 2013 .

[25]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  Have Recent Earthquakes Exposed Flaws in or Misunderstandings of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis , 2012 .

[26]  H. Thio,et al.  Attenuation Relations of Strong Ground Motion in Japan Using Site Classification Based on Predominant Period , 2006 .

[27]  D. Giardini,et al.  Assessment of Seismic Hazard in the Middle East and Caucasus : EMME ( Earthquake Model of Middle East ) Project , 2012 .

[28]  Vladimir Kossobokov,et al.  Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program maps are erroneous , 2012, Seismic Instruments.

[29]  P. Alexandre,et al.  The SHARE European Earthquake Catalogue (SHEEC) 1000–1899 , 2013, Journal of Seismology.

[30]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Empirical Ground-Motion Relations for Subduction-Zone Earthquakes and Their Application to Cascadia and Other Regions , 2003 .

[31]  I. Wong How big, how bad, how often: are extreme events accounted for in modern seismic hazard analyses? , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[32]  J. G. Tanner,et al.  Seismic Hazard in Latin America and the Caribbean - Volume 5 - Final Report , 1997 .

[33]  G. Weatherill,et al.  OpenQuake Engine: An Open Hazard (and Risk) Software for the Global Earthquake Model , 2014 .

[34]  R. Basili,et al.  The Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS), version 3: Summarizing 20 years of research on Italy's earthquake geology , 2008 .

[35]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Assessing global earthquake risks: the Global Earthquake Model (GEM) initiative , 2013 .

[36]  S. Akkar,et al.  Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[37]  J. Douglas,et al.  Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[38]  J. Bommer,et al.  Empirical Equations for the Prediction of PGA, PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East , 2010 .