Revisiting Pneumatic Nail Gun Trigger Recommendations.

Use of a pneumatic nail gun with a sequential actuation trigger (SAT) significantly diminishes the risk for acute traumatic injury compared to use of a contact actuation trigger (CAT) nail gun. A theoretically-based increased risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders from use of a SAT nail gun, relative to CAT, appears unlikely and remains unproven. Based on current knowledge, the use of CAT nail guns cannot be justified as a safe alternative to SAT nail guns. This letter provides a perspective of ergonomists and occupational safety researchers recommending the use of the sequential actuation trigger for all nail gun tasks in the construction industry.

[1]  Barbara Silverstein,et al.  PNEUMATIC NAILER INJURIES A Report on Washington State 1990-1998 , 2001 .

[2]  James Albers,et al.  Finger Tendon Travel Associated with Sequential Trigger Nail Gun Use , 2013, IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors.

[4]  H J Lipscomb,et al.  Nail gun injuries in residential carpentry: lessons from active injury surveillance , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[5]  Nail-gun injuries treated in emergency departments--United States, 2001-2005. , 2007, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[6]  Hester Lipscomb,et al.  Nail gun injuries among construction workers. , 2003, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[7]  Brian D Lowe,et al.  Residential Building Stakeholders' Attitudes and Beliefs regarding Nail Gun Injury Risks and Prevention , 2014, New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS.