The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics

John G. Cramer Department of Physics FM 15, -University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 and Bereich Kernund Strahlenphysik, Hahn-Meitner-Institut f'ur Kernforschung, 0-1000 Berlin 39 The interpretational problems of quantum mechanics are considered. The way in which the standard Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics deals with these problems is reviewed. A new interpretation of the formalism of quantum mechanics, the transactional interpretation, is presented. The basic element of this interpretation is the transaction describing a quantum event as an exchange of advanced and retarded waves, as implied by the work of Wheeler and Feynman, Dirac, and others. The transactional interpretation is explicitly nonlocal and thereby consistent with recent tests of the Bell inequality, yet is relativistically invariant and fully causal. A detailed comparison of the transactional and Copenhagen interpretations is made in the context of well-known quantum-mechanical Gedankenexperimente and "paradoxes. " The transactional interpretation permits quantum-mechanical wave functions to be interpreted as real waves physically present in space rather than as "mathematical representations of knowledge" as in the Copenhagen interpretation. The transactional interpretation is shown to provide insight into the complex character of the quantum-mechanical state vector and the mechanism associated with its "collapse. " It also leads in a natural way to justification of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the Born probability law (I' =gf*), basic elements of the Copenhagen interpretation.

[1]  Erwin Schrödinger,et al.  Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem , 1925 .

[2]  W. Heisenberg.  A quantum-theoretical reinterpretation of kinematic and mechanical relations , 1925 .

[3]  M. Born.  Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge , 1926 .

[4]  M. Born.  Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge , 1926 .

[5]  Erwin Schrödinger,et al.  Über das Verhältnis der Heisenberg‐Born‐Jordanschen Quantenmechanik zu der meinem , 1926 .

[6]  E. Schrödinger.  Energieaustausch nach der Wellenmechanik , 1927 .

[7]  E. Schrödinger.  Über den Comptoneffekt , 2022 .

[8]  E. Schrödinger.  Der Energieimpulssatz der Materiewellen , 1927 .

[9]  M. Born.  Physical Aspects of Quantum Mechanics , 1927, Nature.

[10]  Louis de Broglie,et al.  La mécanique ondulatoire et la structure atomique de la matière et du rayonnement , 1927 .

[11]  C. Darwin.  A Collision Problem in the Wave Mechanics , 1929 .

[12]  R. Peierls,et al.  Erweiterung des Unbestimmtheitsprinzips für die relativistische Quantentheorie , 1931 .

[13]  N. Bohr,et al.  Quantum Mechanics and Physical Reality , 1935, Nature.

[14]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[15]  E. Schrödinger.  Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems , 1935, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[16]  N. Bohr.  II - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[17]  W. H. Furry.  Note on the Quantum-Mechanical Theory of Measurement , 1936 .

[18]  W. H. Furry.  Remarks on Measurements in Quantum Theory , 1936 .

[19]  Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac,et al.  Classical theory of radiating electrons , 1938 .

[20]  J. Wheeler,et al.  Interaction with the Absorber as the Mechanism of Radiation , 1945 .

[21]  R. Feynman.  Space - time approach to quantum electrodynamics , 1949 .

[22]  J. Wheeler,et al.  Classical Electrodynamics in Terms of Direct Interparticle Action , 1949 .

[23]  M. Renninger.  Zum Wellen-Korpuskel-Dualismus , 1953 .

[24]  H. Everett.  "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .

[25]  J. Wheeler.  Assessment of Everett's 'Relative State' Formulation of Quantum Theory , 1957 .

[26]  J. Lebowitz,et al.  TIME SYMMETRY IN THE QUANTUM PROCESS OF MEASUREMENT , 1964 .

[27]  J. Bell.  On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .

[28]  O. Beauregard.  LE · PARADOXE · DES CORRELATIONS D'EINSTEIN: ET DE SCHRÖDINGER ET L'ËPAISSEUR TEMPORELLE DE LA TRANSITION QUANTIQUE , 1965 .

[29]  Robert Bruce Lindsay,et al.  The Current Interpretation of Wave Mechanics , 1965 .

[30]  J. Bell.  On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .

[31]  L. Mandel,et al.  Interference of Independent Photon Beams , 1967 .

[32]  G. Feinberg,et al.  Possibility of Faster-Than-Light Particles , 1967 .

[33]  James B. Hartle,et al.  Quantum Mechanics of Individual Systems , 1968, 1907.02953.

[34]  ELECTRODYNAMICS OF DIRECT INTERPARTICLE ACTION. I. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL RESPONSE OF THE UNIVERSE. , 1969 .

[35]  A quantum theory of Wheeler–Feynman electrodynamics , 1970 .

[36]  Bryce S. DeWitt,et al.  Quantum mechanics and reality , 1970 .

[37]  Leslie E Ballentine,et al.  The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics , 1970 .

[38]  E. H. Walker,et al.  Quantum‐mechanics debate , 1971 .

[39]  Electrodynamics of direct interparticle action: II. Relativistic treatment of radiative processes , 1971 .

[40]  Henry P. Stapp,et al.  S-MATRIX INTERPRETATION OF QUANTUM THEORY. , 1971 .

[41]  EXTENSION OF WHEELER--FEYNMAN QUANTUM THEORY TO THE RELATIVISTIC DOMAIN. I. SCATTERING PROCESSES. , 1971 .

[42]  Matison,et al.  Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories , 1972 .

[43]  Extension of Wheeler-Feynman quantum theory to the relativistic domain. II. Emission processes , 1972 .

[44]  R. B. Partridge.  Absorber Theory of Radiation and the Future of the Universe , 1973, Nature.

[45]  J. Cramer,et al.  Importance of Coulomb interaction potentials in heavy-ion distorted-wave Born-approximation calculations , 1974 .

[46]  Nick Herbert.  Cryptographic approach to hidden variables , 1975 .

[47]  D. Pegg.  Absorber theory of radiation , 1975 .

[48]  W. Davidon.  Quantum physics of single systems , 1976 .

[49]  H. Stapp.  Theory of reality , 1977 .

[50]  O. C. D. Beauregard.  Time symmetry and the Einstein paradox , 1977 .

[51]  O. C. D. Beauregard.  Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen non-separability and Feynman non-locality , 1977 .

[52]  P. H. Eberhard,et al.  Bell's theorem without hidden variables , 1977 .

[53]  Nick Herbert,et al.  Generalization of Bell's theorem , 1978 .

[54]  G. Feinberg.  Lorentz invariance of tachyon theories , 1978 .

[55]  O. C. D. Beauregard.  S-matrix, Feynman zigzag and Einstein correlation , 1978 .

[56]  A. Shimony,et al.  Bell's theorem. Experimental tests and implications , 1978 .

[57]  P. H. Eberhard,et al.  Bell’s theorem and the different concepts of locality , 1978 .

[58]  B. D'espagnat,et al.  The Quantum Theory and Reality , 1979 .

[59]  O. C. D. Beauregard.  Time symmetry and the Einstein paradox. - II , 1979 .

[60]  T. Weber,et al.  On some recent suggestions of superluminal communication through the collapse of the wave function , 1979 .

[61]  M. Gyulassy,et al.  PION INTERFEROMETRY OF NUCLEAR COLLISIONS I: THEORY , 1979 .

[62]  O. C. D. Beauregard.  Ψ Collapse and locality , 1979 .

[63]  G. Ghirardi,et al.  A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process , 1980 .

[64]  F. Selleri,et al.  Unacceptability of the Pauli-Jordan propagator in physical applications of quantum mechanics , 1980 .

[65]  J. Cramer.  Generalized absorber theory and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1980 .

[66]  Anthony J Leggett,et al.  Macroscopic Quantum Systems and the Quantum Theory of Measurement (Progress in Statistical and Solid State Physics--In Commemoration of the Sixtieth Birthday of Ryogo Kubo) -- (Statistical Physics) , 1980 .

[67]  H. Stapp.  Locality and reality , 1980 .

[68]  E. Recami,et al.  On the physical nonexistence of signals going backwards in time, and quantum mechanics , 1980 .

[69]  K. Popper,et al.  Possible direct physical detection of de Broglie waves , 1981 .

[70]  N. Mermin.  Bringing Home the Atomic World: Quantum Mysteries for Anybody. , 1981 .

[71]  R. Voss,et al.  Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling in 1-μm Nb Josephson Junctions , 1981 .

[72]  R. Dicke,et al.  Interaction‐free quantum measurements: A paradox? , 1981 .

[73]  Nick Herbert.  FLASH—A superluminal communicator based upon a new kind of quantum measurement , 1982 .

[74]  O. C. D. Beauregard.  Disagreement with Garuccio, Popper and Vigier , 1982 .

[75]  G. Roger,et al.  Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers , 1982 .

[76]  W. Wootters,et al.  A single quantum cannot be cloned , 1982, Nature.

[77]  Peter W. Milonni,et al.  PHOTONS CANNOT ALWAYS BE REPLICATED , 1982 .

[78]  J. Vigier,et al.  New experimental set-up for the detection of de Broglie waves☆ , 1982 .

[79]  H. Stapp.  Bell's theorem as a nonlocality property of quantum theory , 1982 .

[80]  P. Grangier,et al.  Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment : A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities , 1982 .

[81]  Philippe H. Eberhard.  Constraints of determinism and of Bell's inequalities are not equivalent , 1982 .

[82]  D. Dieks.  Communication by EPR devices , 1982 .

[83]  J. Cramer.  The arrow of electromagnetic time and the generalized absorber theory , 1983 .

[84]  Relativistic quantum logic , 1983 .

[85]  N. David Mermin,et al.  Is the Moon There When Nobody Looks? Reality and the Quantum Theory , 1985 .

[86]  O. Costa de Beauregard.  On Some Frequent but Controversial Statements Concerning the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations , 1985 .

[87]  Albert,et al.  Curious new statistical prediction of quantum mechanics. , 1985, Physical review letters.