Specialized hybrid learners resolve Rogers' paradox about the adaptive value of social learning.

Culture is considered an evolutionary adaptation that enhances reproductive fitness. A common explanation is that social learning, the learning mechanism underlying cultural transmission, enhances mean fitness by avoiding the costs of individual learning. This explanation was famously contradicted by Rogers (1988), who used a simple mathematical model to show that cheap social learning can invade a population without raising its mean fitness. He concluded that some crucial factor remained unaccounted for, which would reverse this surprising result. Here we extend this model to include a more complex environment and limited resources, where individuals cannot reliably learn everything about the environment on their own. Under such conditions, cheap social learning evolves and enhances mean fitness, via hybrid learners capable of specializing their individual learning. We then show that while spatial or social constraints hinder the evolution of hybrid learners, a novel social learning strategy, complementary copying, can mitigate these effects.

[1]  Micael Ehn,et al.  Adaptive strategies for cumulative cultural learning. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  Human cumulative culture: a comparative perspective , 2014, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[3]  Arnon Lotem,et al.  Evolution of social learning when high expected payoffs are associated with high risk of failure , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[4]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Experimental evidence for the maintenance of foraging specializations by frequency-dependent choice in flocks of spice finches , 1997 .

[5]  R. Dukas,et al.  Causes and Consequences of Limited Attention , 2004, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[6]  Tom Griffith,et al.  Plato: 'The Republic' , 2000 .

[7]  J. Davis Specialization in Feeding Location by Herring Gulls , 1975 .

[8]  R.G.B. Brown Seed Selection By Pigeons , 1969 .

[9]  G. Schaller The Serengeti Lion: A Study of Predator-Prey Relations , 1972 .

[10]  T. Caraco,et al.  Social Foraging Theory , 2018 .

[11]  T. Lillicrap,et al.  Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament , 2010, Science.

[12]  L. Partridge Individual differences in feeding efficiencies and feeding preferences of captive great tits , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  E. Durkheim FROM THE DIVISION OF LABOR IN SOCIETY , 2019, The New Economic Sociology.

[14]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Exchangeable producer and scrounger roles in a captive flock of feral pigeons: a case for the skill pool effect , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Luke Rendell,et al.  ROGERS’ PARADOX RECAST AND RESOLVED: POPULATION STRUCTURE AND THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL LEARNING STRATEGIES , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  P. Grant The feeding of darwin's finches on Tribulus cistoides (L.) seeds , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  P. Richerson,et al.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process , 1988 .

[18]  S. Ghirlanda,et al.  Evolution of social learning does not explain the origin of human cumulative culture. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  M. Tomasello The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition , 2000 .

[20]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  Evolution of social versus individual learning in a subdivided population revisited: comparative analysis of three coexistence mechanisms using the inclusive-fitness method. , 2014, Theoretical population biology.

[21]  Alan R. Rogers,et al.  Does Biology Constrain Culture , 1988 .

[22]  Daisuke Nakanishi,et al.  Does social/cultural learning increase human adaptability?: Rogers's question revisited , 2003 .

[23]  J. E. Bryan,et al.  Food Specialization By Individual Trout , 1972 .

[24]  Peter J. Richerson,et al.  Why does culture increase human adaptability , 1995 .

[25]  Daisuke Nakanishi,et al.  Cost–benefit analysis of social/cultural learning in a nonstationary uncertain environment: An evolutionary simulation and an experiment with human subjects , 2002 .

[26]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Group Foraging: The Skill Pool Effect and Frequency-Dependent Learning , 1984, The American Naturalist.