A modular concept of plant foraging behaviour: the interplay between local responses and systemic control.

In this paper we examined the notion that plant foraging for resources in heterogeneous environments must involve: (1) plasticity at the level of individual modules in reaction to localized environmental signals; and (2) the potential for modification of these responses either by the signals received from connected modules that may be exposed to different conditions, or by the signals reflecting the overall resource status of the plant. A conceptual model is presented to illustrate how plant foraging behaviour is achieved through these processes acting in concert, from the signal reception through signal transduction to morphological or physiological response. Evidence to support the concept is reviewed, using selective root placement under nutritionally heterogeneous conditions and elongation responses of stems and petioles to shade as examples. We discussed how the adoption of this model can promote understanding of the ecological significance of foraging behaviour. We also identified a need to widen the experimental repertoires of both molecular physiology and ecology in order to increase our insight into both the regulation and functioning of foraging responses, and their relationship with the patterns of environmental heterogeneity under which plants have evolved.

[1]  Brian G Forde,et al.  Nitrate and glutamate as environmental cues for behavioural responses in plant roots. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[2]  C. Ballaré.  Illuminated behaviour: phytochrome as a key regulator of light foraging and plant anti-herbivore defence. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[3]  F. Cvrčková,et al.  Plant intelligence , 2009, Plant signaling & behavior.

[4]  N. Anten,et al.  Interactive Effects of Spectral Shading and Mechanical Stress on the Expression and Costs of Shade Avoidance , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[5]  A. K. Grennan.  Phosphate Accumulation in Plants: Signaling , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[6]  D. Gibbs,et al.  Branching out in new directions: the control of root architecture by lateral root formation. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[7]  R. Karban.  Plant behaviour and communication. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[8]  B. Forde,et al.  Nitrate signalling mediated by the NRT1.1 nitrate transporter antagonises L-glutamate-induced changes in root architecture. , 2008, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[9]  T. Chiou,et al.  Regulatory Network of MicroRNA399 and PHO2 by Systemic Signaling1[W][OA] , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[10]  Jordi Bou-Torrent,et al.  Light signaling: back to space. , 2008, Trends in plant science.

[11]  W. Scheible,et al.  MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis , 2008, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[12]  M. Stitt,et al.  Coordination of carbon supply and plant growth. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[13]  G. Viennois,et al.  Regulation of Root Nitrate Uptake at the NRT2.1 Protein Level in Arabidopsis thaliana* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  B. Forde,et al.  Glutamate in plants: metabolism, regulation, and signalling. , 2007, Journal of experimental botany.

[15]  H. Kroon,et al.  Combined effects of partial root drying and patchy fertilizer placement on nutrient acquisition and growth of oilseed rape , 2007, Plant and Soil.

[16]  R. Pierik,et al.  DELLA protein function in growth responses to canopy signals. , 2007, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[17]  L. Voesenek,et al.  Cytokinin Import Rate as a Signal for Photosynthetic Acclimation to Canopy Light Gradients1[W][OA] , 2007, Plant Physiology.

[18]  P. Tillard,et al.  The Arabidopsis NRT1.1 transporter participates in the signaling pathway triggering root colonization of nitrate-rich patches , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  M. Tester,et al.  Evidence that L-glutamate can act as an exogenous signal to modulate root growth and branching in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2006, Plant & cell physiology.

[20]  Y. Chiao,et al.  Putative Nitrogen Sensing Systems in Higher Plants , 2006 .

[21]  H. de Kroon,et al.  Limited costs of wrong root placement in Rumex palustris in heterogeneous soils. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[22]  Nigel G Halford,et al.  Nutrient Sensing in Plant Meristems , 2006, Plant Molecular Biology.

[23]  H. de Kroon,et al.  Root foraging theory put to the test. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  P. Tillard,et al.  A Central Role for the Nitrate Transporter NRT2.1 in the Integrated Morphological and Physiological Responses of the Root System to Nitrogen Limitation in Arabidopsis1 , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[25]  Chun-Lin Su,et al.  Regulation of Phosphate Homeostasis by MicroRNA in Arabidopsis[W] , 2005, The Plant Cell Online.

[26]  Ottoline Leyser,et al.  Hormonally controlled expression of the Arabidopsis MAX4 shoot branching regulatory gene. , 2005, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[27]  R. Pierik,et al.  Reaching out of the shade. , 2005, Current opinion in plant biology.

[28]  F. Daniel-Vedele,et al.  The putative high-affinity nitrate transporter NRT2.1 represses lateral root initiation in response to nutritional cues. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  S. Filleur,et al.  Nutritional regulation of ANR1 and other root-expressed MADS-box genes in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2005, Planta.

[30]  S. Kembel,et al.  Plant Phenotypic Plasticity Belowground: A Phylogenetic Perspective on Root Foraging Trade‐Offs , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Hans de Kroon,et al.  A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[32]  Hirokazu Tsukaya,et al.  The different growth responses of the Arabidopsis thaliana leaf blade and the petiole during shade avoidance are regulated by photoreceptors and sugar. , 2005, Plant & cell physiology.

[33]  J. Cahill,et al.  Patch–background contrast and patch density have limited effects on root proliferation and plant performance in Abutilon theophrasti , 2004 .

[34]  Meng Chen,et al.  Light signal transduction in higher plants. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[35]  M. Hutchings,et al.  The effects of environmental heterogeneity on root growth and root/shoot partitioning. , 2004, Annals of botany.

[36]  R. Pierik,et al.  Canopy studies on ethylene-insensitive tobacco identify ethylene as a novel element in blue light and plant-plant signalling. , 2004, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[37]  G. Whitelam,et al.  Gating of the rapid shade-avoidance response by the circadian clock in plants , 2003, Nature.

[38]  Filip Rolland,et al.  Role of the Arabidopsis Glucose Sensor HXK1 in Nutrient, Light, and Hormonal Signaling , 2003, Science.

[39]  M. Okamoto,et al.  Regulation of NRT1 and NRT2 gene families of Arabidopsis thaliana: responses to nitrate provision. , 2003, Plant & cell physiology.

[40]  G. Morelli,et al.  Light and shade in the photocontrol of Arabidopsis growth. , 2002, Trends in plant science.

[41]  B. Forde.  Local and long-range signaling pathways regulating plant responses to nitrate. , 2002, Annual review of plant biology.

[42]  H. Leyser,et al.  Nitrate and phosphate availability and distribution have different effects on root system architecture of Arabidopsis. , 2002, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[43]  Rongchen Wang,et al.  The Arabidopsis Dual-Affinity Nitrate Transporter Gene AtNRT1.1 (CHL1) Is Activated and Functions in Nascent Organ Development during Vegetative and Reproductive Growth , 2001, The Plant Cell Online.

[44]  C. Weinig,et al.  PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY EARLY IN LIFE CONSTRAINS DEVELOPMENTAL RESPONSES LATER , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  P. Tillard,et al.  Differential regulation of the NO3- and NH4+ transporter genes AtNrt2.1 and AtAmt1.1 in Arabidopsis: relation with long-distance and local controls by N status of the plant. , 2001, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[46]  P. Newton,et al.  Branching responses of a plagiotropic clonal herb to localised incidence of light simulating that reflected from vegetation , 2001, Oecologia.

[47]  T. Berleth,et al.  Plant morphogenesis: long-distance coordination and local patterning. , 2001, Current opinion in plant biology.

[48]  S. Sultan.  Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[49]  Harry Smith,et al.  Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants—an emerging synthesis , 2000, Nature.

[50]  Rongchen Wang,et al.  Genomic Analysis of a Nutrient Response in Arabidopsis Reveals Diverse Expression Patterns and Novel Metabolic and Potential Regulatory Genes Induced by Nitrate , 2000, Plant Cell.

[51]  A. Hodge,et al.  Are microorganisms more effective than plants at competing for nitrogen? , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[52]  Sjef Smeekens,et al.  SUGAR-INDUCED SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION IN PLANTS. , 2000, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[53]  J. Casal,et al.  Phytochromes, Cryptochromes, Phototropin: Photoreceptor Interactions in Plants , 2000, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[54]  M. Hutchings,et al.  The effects of environmental heterogeneity on the performance of Glechoma hederacea: the interactions between patch contrast and patch scale , 1999 .

[55]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  Temporal and spatial variation in soil resources in a deciduous woodland , 1999 .

[56]  P W Barlow,et al.  Dual pathways for regulation of root branching by nitrate. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  H. Huber,et al.  A comparative study of spacer plasticity in erect and stoloniferous herbs , 1998 .

[58]  B. Forde,et al.  An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture. , 1998, Science.

[59]  H. Kroon,et al.  The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants , 1997 .

[60]  H. Kroon,et al.  Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by spatial division of labour in a clonal plant. , 1996 .

[61]  Yanhong Tang,et al.  Characteristics of small-scale heterogeneity in light availability within aMiscanthus sinensis canopy , 1995, Ecological Research.

[62]  K. Gross,et al.  Spatial variation in nitrogen availability in three successional plant communities , 1995 .

[63]  M. Dong.  Morphological responses to local light conditions in clonal herbs from contrasting habitats, and their modification due to physiological integration , 1995, Oecologia.

[64]  D. Robinson.  The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[65]  M. Hutchings,et al.  Does Physiological Integration Enable Clonal Herbs to Integrate the Effects of Environmental Heterogeneity , 1993 .

[66]  L. Thompson.  The influence of the radiation environment around the node on morphogenesis and growth of white clover (Trifolium repens) , 1993 .

[67]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Light spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[68]  R. Chazdon,et al.  The Importance of Sunflecks for Forest Understory Plants Photosynthetic machinery appears adapted to brief, unpredictable periods of radiation , 1991 .

[69]  W. Bond,et al.  The Influence of Grazing on the Evolution, Morphology and Physiology of Plants as Modular Organisms [and Discussion] , 1991 .

[70]  Ruaraidh Sackville Hamilton,et al.  Within-population variation in localized and integrated responses of Trifolium repens to biotically patchy environments , 1991, Oecologia.

[71]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  Sunfleck dynamics in relation to canopy structure in a soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) canopy , 1990 .

[72]  Dan Cohen,et al.  How portulaca seedlings avoid their neighbours , 1990, Oecologia.

[73]  H. Kroon,et al.  Fine-scale spatial distribution of leaves and shoots of two chalk grassland perennials , 1990, Vegetatio.

[74]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  THE INTEGRATION OF NEIGHBOURHOOD EFFECTS BY CLONAL GENETS IN SOLIDAGO CANADENSIS , 1985 .

[75]  James White,et al.  THE PLANT AS A METAPOPULATION , 1979 .

[76]  L. Saker,et al.  Nutrient Supply and the Growth of the Seminal Root System in Barley III. COMPENSATORY INCREASES IN GROWTH OF LATERAL ROOTS, AND IN RATES OF PHOSPHATE UPTAKE, IN RESPONSE TO A LOCALIZED SUPPLY OF PHOSPHATE , 1978 .

[77]  M. Drew,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF A LOCALISED SUPPLY OF PHOSPHATE, NITRATE, AMMONIUM AND POTASSIUM ON THE GROWTH OF THE SEMINAL ROOT SYSTEM, AND THE SHOOT, IN BARLEY , 1975 .

[78]  L. Saker,et al.  Nutrient Supply and the Growth of the Seminal Root System in Barley I. THE EFFECT OF NITRATE CONCENTRATION ON THE GROWTH OF AXES AND LATERALS , 1973 .

[79]  T. Halliday,et al.  A Framework for Plant Behavior , 2008 .

[80]  M. Hutchings,et al.  Performance of a clonal species in patchy environments: effects of environmental context on yield at local and whole-plant scales , 2007, Evolutionary Ecology.

[81]  L. Voesenek,et al.  PLANT HORMONES REGULATE FAST SHOOT ELONGATION UNDER WATER: FROM GENES TO COMMUNITIES , 2004 .

[82]  H. Kroon,et al.  Foraging in Plants: the Role of Morphological Plasticity in Resource Acquisition , 1994 .

[83]  J. Gerendás,et al.  Interaction between root growth and mineral nutrition , 1993 .

[84]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  Geostatistical Patterns of Soil Heterogeneity Around Individual Perennial Plants , 1993 .

[85]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  SUNFLECKS AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN PLANT CANOPIES , 1990 .