Some differences between phonetic and auditory modes of perception

When third-formant transitions are appropriately incorporated into an acoustic syllable, they provide critical support for the phonetic percepts we call [d] and [g], but when presented in isolation they are perceived as time-varying ‘chirps’. In the present experiment, both modes of perception were made available simultaneously by presenting the third-format transitions to one ear and the remainder of the acoustic syllable to the other. On the speech side of this duplex percept, where the transitions supported the perception of stop-vowel syllables, perception was categorical and influenced by the presence of a preposed [al] or [ar]. On the nonspeech side, where the same transitions were heard as ‘chirps’, perception was continuous and free of influence from the preposed syllables. As both differences occurred under conditions in which the acoustic input was constant, we should suppose that they reflect the different properties of auditory and phonetic modes of perception.

[1]  T. C. Rand,et al.  Dichotic release from masking for speech , 1974 .

[2]  W. D. Ward,et al.  Categorical perception--phenomenon or epiphenomenon: evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  V. Mann Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception , 1980 .

[4]  W. Siegel,et al.  Categorical perception of tonal intervals: Musicians can't tell sharp irotaflat , 1977 .

[5]  K. Stevens,et al.  Perception of Sounds Characterized by a Rapidly Changing Resonant Frequency , 1961 .

[6]  A. Liberman On Finding That Speech Is Special , 1982 .

[7]  V. Mann,et al.  Perceptual assessment of fricative--stop coarticulation. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  A M Liberman,et al.  Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: Evidence for a phonetic mode , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants , 1975, Science.

[10]  B H Repp,et al.  Duplex perception: Confirmation of fusion , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  A. Liberman,et al.  The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants. , 1954 .

[12]  A. Liberman,et al.  Acoustic Loci and Transitional Cues for Consonants , 1954 .

[13]  S. Locke,et al.  Categorical perception in a non-linguistic mode. , 1973, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[14]  Terry G. Halwes,et al.  Discrimination in speech and nonspeech modes , 1971 .

[15]  Peter D. Eimas,et al.  Auditory and linguistic processing of cues for place of articulation by infants , 1974 .

[16]  Further investigation into the influence of preceding liquids on stop consonant perception , 1981 .

[17]  P. Kuhl Discrimination of speech by nonhuman animals: Basic auditory sensitivities conducive to the perception of speech‐sound categories , 1981 .

[18]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  R E Pastore,et al.  Discrimination and labeling of noise-buzz sequences with varying noise-lead times: an example of categorical perception. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.

[21]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Theoretical notes. Motor theory of speech perception: a reply to Lane's critical review. , 1970, Psychological review.

[22]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  B. Repp Phonetic trading relations and context effects : new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception , 1982 .

[24]  V. Mann,et al.  Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.