Variations in the temporal pattern of perforant pathway stimulation control the activity in the mesolimbic pathway

Signal processing in the hippocampal formation and resultant signal propagation to cortical and subcortical structures during high frequency stimulation (i.e. 100 Hz) of the perforant pathway was studied in medetomidine anesthetized rats by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electrophysiological recordings. The perforant pathway was stimulated with bursts of 20 pulses, one burst per second, or with continuously applied pulses. The stimulation duration was adjusted to 8 s (short) or 30 s (long). In general, extending the stimulation duration only caused a local spreading of the fMRI response, but no changes in the magnitude of the fMRI response. This was in agreement with the electrophysiological responses, which also remained unchanged. In contrast, increasing the number of pulses in one stimulus train (i.e. changing from burst to continuous stimulation), caused both spreading and an increase in local fMRI responses that were accompanied by an altered neuronal response pattern. Continuous stimulation also triggered additional fMRI responses in the septum, nucleus accumbens, anterior cingulate cortex/medial prefrontal cortex, and ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra. The appearance of fMRI responses outside the hippocampal formation required at least 3 consecutive stimulation trains, characterized by region specific hemodynamic response functions. Thus, once triggered, continuous stimulation caused a sequential appearance in fMRI responses starting in the hippocampal formation, followed by signal changes in the ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra and anterior cingulate cortex/medial prefrontal cortex and eventually in the nucleus accumbens. These results indicate that high frequency stimulation of the hippocampal formation can activate the mesolimbic pathway, provided that repetitive stimulations are applied.

[1]  W. Singer,et al.  Hemodynamic Signals Correlate Tightly with Synchronized Gamma Oscillations , 2005, Science.

[2]  J. Lisman,et al.  The Hippocampal-VTA Loop: Controlling the Entry of Information into Long-Term Memory , 2005, Neuron.

[3]  Edith Hamel,et al.  Pathway-Specific Variations in Neurovascular and Neurometabolic Coupling in Rat Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2009, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[4]  T. Prescott,et al.  The ventral basal ganglia, a selection mechanism at the crossroads of space, strategy, and reward. , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[5]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Physiological identification and analysis of dentate granule cell responses to stimulation of the medial and lateral perforant pathways in the rat , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  How and when the fMRI BOLD signal relates to underlying neural activity: The danger in dissociation , 2010, Brain Research Reviews.

[7]  Menno P. Witter,et al.  Connections of the subiculum of the rat: Topography in relation to columnar and laminar organization , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Electric stimulation fMRI of the perforant pathway to the rat hippocampus. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  J. Glowinski,et al.  Hippocampo‐prefrontal cortex pathway: Anatomical and electrophysiological characteristics , 2000, Hippocampus.

[10]  D. Heeger,et al.  In this issue , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[11]  Frank Angenstein,et al.  The current functional state of local neuronal circuits controls the magnitude of a BOLD response to incoming stimuli , 2010, NeuroImage.

[12]  Dirk Wiedermann,et al.  A fully noninvasive and robust experimental protocol for longitudinal fMRI studies in the rat , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  Frank Angenstein,et al.  Frequency-dependent activation pattern in the rat hippocampus, a simultaneous electrophysiological and fMRI study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[14]  J Hennig,et al.  RARE imaging: A fast imaging method for clinical MR , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Martin Lauritzen,et al.  Neuronal inhibition and excitation, and the dichotomic control of brain hemodynamic and oxygen responses , 2012, NeuroImage.

[16]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neural basis of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004 .

[17]  B. Cauli,et al.  Pyramidal Neurons Are “Neurogenic Hubs” in the Neurovascular Coupling Response to Whisker Stimulation , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Edith Hamel,et al.  Specific Subtypes of Cortical GABA Interneurons Contribute to the Neurovascular Coupling Response to Basal Forebrain Stimulation , 2008, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[19]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[20]  M. Krug,et al.  Aminergic blockade modulales long-term potentiation in the dentate gyrus of freely moving rats , 1983, Brain Research Bulletin.

[21]  N. Logothetis The neural basis of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  M. Witter The perforant path: projections from the entorhinal cortex to the dentate gyrus. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[23]  M. Larkum,et al.  Dopamine modulates synaptic plasticity in dendrites of rat and human dentate granule cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  D. Nair About being BOLD , 2005, Brain Research Reviews.

[25]  D. Attwell,et al.  The neural basis of functional brain imaging signals , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  A. Grace,et al.  Regulation of firing of dopaminergic neurons and control of goal-directed behaviors , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  A. Hjorth-Simonsen,et al.  Origin and termination of the hippocampal perforant path in the rat studied by silver impregnation , 1972, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  H. Scheich,et al.  The BOLD Response in the Rat Hippocampus Depends Rather on Local Processing of Signals than on the Input or Output Activity. A Combined Functional MRI and Electrophysiological Study , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.