The Local Connection

In light of extensive decentralization in much of the world, analyses of citizen satisfaction with democracy that treat citizens as subjects of their national governments alone are incomplete. In this article, the author uses regression analysis of unique survey data from Argentina to explore the relationship between local government performance and citizen satisfaction with democracy. She demonstrates that there is indeed an important link between local government performance and citizen system support but also that citizens distinguish between qualitatively different types of government performance. Certain measures of local government performance, such as corruption, have ramifications for citizens' evaluations of the functioning of their democracy and even for citizens' faith in democracy per se. At the same time, other types of local government performance, such as local bureaucratic inefficiency, do not reverberate beyond the local sphere. These results suggest mixed implications for future democratic stability in Latin America.

[1]  Ernesto H. Stein,et al.  The New Political Economy: Positive Economics and Negative Politics , 1989 .

[2]  C. Anderson,et al.  Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[3]  P. Norris.  Institutional Explanations for Political Support , 1999 .

[4]  M. Seligson,et al.  Pitfalls of power to the people: Decentralization, local government performance, and system support in Bolivia , 2003 .

[5]  M. Seligson.  The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American Countries , 2002, The Journal of Politics.

[6]  Jonathan Rodden.  Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement , 2004 .

[7]  M. Fiorina.  Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections: A Micro-Analysis* , 1978 .

[8]  C. Anderson.  Losers' Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy , 2005 .

[9]  Erik Wibbels,et al.  The Subnational Politics of Economic Adjustment , 2000 .

[10]  Jonathan Rodden.  The Dilemma of Fiscal Federalism: Grants and Fiscal Performance around the World , 2002 .

[11]  Karen L. Remmer,et al.  Political Decentralization and Electoral Accountability: The Argentine Experience, 1983–2001 , 2005, British Journal of Political Science.

[12]  Jeffery J. Mondak,et al.  Meaning and Measurement in Cross-National Research on Satisfaction with Democracy , 2001 .

[13]  Mariano Tommasi,et al.  WHY IS ARGENTINA'S FISCAL FEDERALISM SO INEFFICIENT? ENTERING THE LABYRINTH * , 1999 .

[14]  D. Easton.  A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support , 1975, British Journal of Political Science.

[15]  M. Seligson.  The Measurement and Impact of Corruption Victimization: Survey Evidence from Latin America , 2006 .

[16]  S. Bowler,et al.  Local Context and Democratization in Mexico , 2005 .

[17]  D. Easton,et al.  A Systems Analysis of Political Life , 1966 .

[18]  H. Klingemann,et al.  Citizens and the state , 1998 .

[19]  Jonathan Rodden,et al.  Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal Federalism and the Growth of Government , 2003, International Organization.

[20]  Christopher J. Anderson,et al.  Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies , 2003 .

[21]  Philip G. Cerny,et al.  Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries? , 2000 .

[22]  R. Rose,et al.  What Are the Origins of Political Trust? , 2001 .

[23]  P. Norris.  Critical citizens : global support for democratic government , 1999 .

[24]  Joakim Ekman,et al.  Satisfaction with democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics , 2003 .

[25]  P. Svensson,et al.  Support for the Democratic System , 1998 .

[26]  D. D. Porta.  NINE. Social Capital, Beliefs in Government, and Political Corruption , 2000 .

[27]  Rosario Espinal,et al.  Performance Still Matters , 2006 .