Performance Improvement of Automated Melanoma Diagnosis System by Data Augmentation

Color information is an important tool for diagnosing melanoma. In this study, we used a hyper-spectral imager (HSI), which can measure color information in detail, to develop an automated melanoma diagnosis system. In recent years, the effectiveness of deep learning has become more widely accepted in the field of image recognition. We therefore integrated the deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning into our system. We tried data augmentation to demonstrate how our system improves diagnostic performance. 283 melanoma lesions and 336 non-melanoma lesions were used for the analysis. The data measured by HSI, called the hyperspectral data (HSD), were converted to a single-wavelength image averaged over plus or minus 3 nm. We used GoogLeNet which was pre-trained by ImageNet and then was transferred to analyze the HSD. In the transfer learning, we used not only the original HSD but also artificial augmentation dataset to improve the melanoma classification performance of GoogLeNet. Since GoogLeNet requires three-channel images as input, three wavelengths were selected from those single-wavelength images and assigned to three channels in wavelength order from short to long. The sensitivity and specificity of our system were estimated by 5-fold cross-val-idation. The results of a combination of 530, 560, and 590 nm (combination A) and 500, 620, and 740 nm (com-bination B) were compared. We also compared the diagnostic performance with and without the data augmentation. All images were augmented by inverting the image vertically and/or horizontally. Without data augmentation, the respective sensitivity and specificity of our system were 77.4% and 75.6% for combination A and 73.1% and 80.6% for combination B. With data augmentation, these numbers improved to 79.9% and 82.4% for combination A and 76.7% and 82.2% for combination B. From these results, we conclude that the diagnostic performance of our system has been improved by data augmentation. Furthermore, our system suc-ceeds to differentiate melanoma with a sensitivity of almost 80%. (Less)

[1]  Y. Ohno,et al.  The burden of rare cancer in Japan: application of the RARECARE definition. , 2014, Cancer epidemiology.

[2]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks , 2017, Nature.

[3]  L. Thomas,et al.  Semiological Value of ABCDE Criteria in the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Pigmented Tumors , 1998, Dermatology.

[4]  Toshiaki Saida,et al.  Hyperspectroscopic screening of melanoma on acral volar skin , 2013, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[5]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[6]  H. Koga,et al.  Modification of a melanoma discrimination index derived from hyperspectral data: a clinical trial conducted in 2 centers between March 2011 and December 2013 , 2015, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[7]  Charless C. Fowlkes,et al.  Do We Need More Training Data? , 2015, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[8]  Y. Fujisawa,et al.  Deep‐learning‐based, computer‐aided classifier developed with a small dataset of clinical images surpasses board‐certified dermatologists in skin tumour diagnosis , 2018, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  Jeffrey E Gershenwald,et al.  Melanoma staging: Evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[11]  Mitsutaka Nemoto,et al.  Automatic diagnosis of melanoma using hyperspectral data and GoogLeNet , 2020, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[12]  Michał Grochowski,et al.  Data augmentation for improving deep learning in image classification problem , 2018, 2018 International Interdisciplinary PhD Workshop (IIPhDW).

[13]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[14]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[15]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[16]  A. Kopf,et al.  Early detection of malignant melanoma: The role of physician examination and self‐examination of the skin , 1985, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[17]  T. Nagaoka Recent Advances in Diagnostic Technologies for Melanoma , 2016 .

[18]  Takashi Nagaoka,et al.  A possible melanoma discrimination index based on hyperspectral data: a pilot study , 2012, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[19]  David Polsky,et al.  Early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: revisiting the ABCD criteria. , 2004, JAMA.

[20]  Tuan Vo-Dinh,et al.  A hyperspectral imaging system for in vivo optical diagnostics. Hyperspectral imaging basic principles, instrumental systems, and applications of biomedical interest. , 2004, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.