Pressure mapping from flow imaging: Enhancing computation of the viscous term through velocity reconstruction in near-wall regions

Although being small compared to inertial acceleration, viscous component of the pressure gradient has recently emerged as a potential biomarker for aortic disease conditions including aortic valve stenosis. However, as it involves the computation of second order derivatives and viscous dissipation is locally higher in the near-wall region of the larger vessels, where the lowest local signal-to-noise ratios are encountered, the estimation process from medical image velocity data through mathematical models is highly challenging. We propose a fully automatic framework to recover the laminar viscous pressure gradient through reconstruction of the velocity vector field in the aortic boundary region. An in-silico study is conducted and the pressure drop is computed solving a Poisson problem on pressure using both a reconstructed and non-reconstructed velocity profile near the vessel walls, showing a global improvement of performance with the enhanced method.

[1]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  Aortic Relative Pressure Components Derived from Four-Dimensional Flow Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  O. Friman,et al.  Non-invasive 4D blood flow and pressure quantification in central blood vessels via PC-MRI , 2010, 2010 Computing in Cardiology.

[3]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  A finite-element approach to the direct computation of relative cardiovascular pressure from time-resolved MR velocity data , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  Tino Ebbers,et al.  Improving computation of cardiovascular relative pressure fields from velocity MRI , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  J. Chambers,et al.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[6]  Ted Feldman Assessment of the transvalvular pressure gradient in aortic stenosis. , 2006, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[7]  Michael Markl,et al.  In vivo noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping in the human aorta: Phantom comparison and application in healthy volunteers and patients , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  A Herment,et al.  Velocity encoding versus acceleration encoding for pressure gradient estimation in MR haemodynamic studies. , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  G Maurer,et al.  "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  G. Deeb,et al.  Unoperated patients with severe aortic stenosis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Model-Based Estimation of 4D Relative Pressure Map from 4D Flow MR Images , 2013, STACOM.

[12]  J. Chambers,et al.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. , 2009, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  Catheter-induced Errors in Pressure Measurements in Vessels: an In-vitro and Numerical Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  An accurate, fast and robust method to generate patient-specific cubic Hermite meshes , 2011, Medical Image Anal..