The size-weight illusion in a natural and augmented environment with congruent and incongruent size information

The size-weight illusion (SWI) occurs when the smaller of equally weighted objects is judged to feel heavier than the larger object. Experiment 1 compared the SWI generated in a natural versus augmented-reality environment while grasping and lifting three differently sized cubes of equal weight. Both environments induced the SWI for all twenty participants. Lift kinematics covaried with cube size in both environments. Experiment 2 investigated the influence of incongruent visual size information on the SWI in an augmented environment. Physical cubes were paired with three graphical representations: a smaller, an equal-sized, and a larger cube. The SWI was influenced by both haptic and visual size information. Kinematics covaried with physical size throughout the experiment. Results suggest that vision significantly impacts the bimodal SWI when haptic and visual size information is not redundant. Results have implications for theories of heaviness perception, multimodal interaction, and perception and action in augmented environments.

[1]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  S. Lederman,et al.  The Golf-Ball Illusion: Evidence for Top-down Processing in Weight Perception , 1998, Perception.

[3]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects , 1975 .

[4]  R. Johansson,et al.  Integration of sensory information during the programming of precision grip: comments on the contributions of size cues , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  H E Ross,et al.  Charpentier (1891) on the size—weight illusion , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  S. S. Stevens.  The Psychophysics of Sensory Function. , 1960 .

[7]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Effects of surface texture on weight perception when lifting objects with a precision grip , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Satoru Kawai,et al.  A reexamination of the size–weight illusion induced by visual size cues , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  N. Anderson.  Averaging model applied to the size-weight illusion , 1970 .

[10]  H. Forssberg,et al.  The integration of haptically acquired size information in the programming of precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  M. Heller,et al.  Intersensory conflict between vision and touch: The response modality dominates when precise, attention-riveting judgments are required , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Coming to grips with weight perception: Effects of grasp configuration on perceived heaviness , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size–weight illusion , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Satoru Kawai,et al.  Heaviness perception , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  R. S. Woodworth,et al.  Zur Analyse der Unterschiedsempfindlichkeit , 1899 .

[16]  Satoru Kawai,et al.  Grasping an augmented object to analyse manipulative force control , 2002, Ergonomics.

[17]  S. Lederman,et al.  The material-weight illusion revisited , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  A. Charpentier.  Experimental study of some aspects of weight perception , 1891 .

[19]  R. Granit.  Constant errors in the execution and appreciation of movement. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  J R Flanagan,et al.  The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  S. Lederman,et al.  The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Sidney S. Simon,et al.  Merging of the Senses , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[23]  M. Turvey,et al.  Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  H. Pick,et al.  A developmental and analytic study of the size-weight illusion. , 1967, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[25]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: A validation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  D. Westwood,et al.  Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size-weight illusion. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  R. S. Johansson,et al.  Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Fr. Schumann,et al.  Ueber die psychologischen Grundlagen der Vergleichung gehobener Gewichte , 2005, Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[29]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[30]  R. Johansson,et al.  Sensorimotor prediction and memory in object manipulation. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[31]  H. Ross.  When is a Weight not Illusory? , 1969, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  R. Johansson,et al.  Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  D. Cross,et al.  The relation between size and apparent heaviness , 1975 .

[34]  C. M. Davis,et al.  Lifting movements in the size-weight illusion , 1976 .

[35]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  The size of the visual size cue used for programming manipulative forces during precision grip , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  S. Kawai.  Heaviness perception , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  B. O'Shaughnessy.  The sense of touch , 1989 .

[38]  S. C. Masin,et al.  Experimental demonstration of the sensory basis of the size-weight illusion , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  R. Johansson,et al.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  R. Johansson,et al.  Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Differences in heaviness in relation to density and weight , 1970 .