Publishing in Educational Research Journals: Are Graduate Students Participating?

Professional collaboration in academia is valued because it is believed to encourage the generation and synthesis of ideas, to enhance workplace environments, and to comprise a key element in mentoring practices. Collaboration in writing is often of two types: formal co-authorship or informal commentary on colleagues’ work. Formal co-authorship is a topic that usually draws more attention for its problems and potential controversies than for its putative benefits. In our study, we examined professional academic co-authorship. Focusing on the field of education, we identified four research sub-fields (general education, educational psychology, language studies, and literacy studies) and analysed academic peer-reviewed journals from each of these sub-fields to establish how much collaboration exists in published articles. We then examined the extent to which graduate students are co-authors in these publications and what role this collaboration takes. Implications for collaboration with and between graduate students are discussed.

[1]  M Cecil Smith,et al.  Productivity of Educational Psychologists in Educational Psychology Journals, 1991–1996☆ , 1998 .

[2]  K. Bruffee Collaborative Learning and the “Conversation of Mankind” , 1984, College English.

[3]  P. Balsam,et al.  Maximizing Productivity and Recognition, Part 2: Collaboration and Networking , 2008 .

[4]  M. Gatz,et al.  Determination of Authorship Credit in Published Dissertations , 1992 .

[5]  M. Kocher,et al.  Patterns of co-authorship among economics departments in the USA , 2004 .

[6]  David Kirshner,et al.  Situated cognition : social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives , 2009 .

[7]  Kate E Decleene,et al.  Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association , 2011 .

[8]  Locke,et al.  Productivity of Educational Psychologists in Educational Psychology Journals, 1991-1996 , 2003, Contemporary educational psychology.

[9]  Raymond D. Sauer,et al.  Estimates of the Returns to Quality and Coauthorship in Economic Academia , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  G. D. Thomas,et al.  An alternate look at educational psychologist's productivity from 1991 to 2002 , 2004 .

[11]  M. Tomasello Why We Cooperate , 2009 .

[12]  Mark A. Fine,et al.  Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations , 1993 .

[13]  Donald E. English,et al.  Reasons for Co-Authorship in Business Journals and the Extent of Guest or Gift Authorships. , 2006 .

[14]  Stephanie Vandrick,et al.  Writing for scholarly publication : behind the scenes in language education , 2003 .

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[16]  J. Lave Cultural psychology: The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding , 1990 .

[17]  Mark Lowry Decker,et al.  Productivity in Educational Psychology Journals from 2003 to 2008. , 2010 .

[18]  Edgar J. Manton,et al.  The Trend Toward Multiple Authorship in Business Journals , 2007 .

[19]  M. Fine,et al.  Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations , 1993 .

[20]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[21]  Bryan W. Griffin,et al.  Identification of Factors that Influence Authorship Name Placement and Decisions to Collaborate in Peer-Reviewed, Education-Related Publications. , 2006 .

[22]  M. Holaday,et al.  A preliminary investigation of ethical problems in publication and research. , 1995, Journal of social behavior and personality.