Points, Lines and Arrows in Statistical Graphs

Widely used statistical graphs (such as line graphs and bar graphs) are usually accompanied by graphical entities other than the graph proper. Those graphical cues, such as point marks and arrows serve for communicative purposes by bringing certain aspects to the foreground over the others. The present study discusses the results of an experimental investigation, in which the participants produced sketches of graphical cues on different types of graphs, given sentential expressions of states and processes. The outcomes of the study have the potential for serving as guidelines for the development of software tools that produce graphical cues.

[1]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Graphs as aids to knowledge construction: Signaling techniques for guiding the process of graph comprehension. , 1999 .

[2]  Herbert Freeman,et al.  Shape description via the use of critical points , 1978, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Cengiz Acartürk,et al.  Multimodal Comprehension of Graphics with Textual Annotations: The Role of Graphical Means Relating Annotations and Graph Lines , 2008, Diagrams.

[4]  Christian Freksa,et al.  Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  J. Feldman,et al.  Information along contours and object boundaries. , 2005, Psychological review.

[6]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Spatial Information Theory, 8th International Conference, COSIT 2007, Melbourne, Australia, September 19-23, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, COSIT.

[7]  M. Malbrán The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning , 2007 .

[8]  Paul U. Lee,et al.  Lines, Blobs, Crosses and Arrows: Diagrammatic Communication with Schematic Figures , 2000, Diagrams.

[9]  S. Kosslyn Understanding charts and graphs , 1989 .

[10]  Christopher Habel,et al.  Causal Inference in Graph-Text Constellations: Designing Verbally Annotated Graphs**Supported in part by DFG (German Science Foundation) in ITRG 1247 ‘Cross-modal Interaction in Natural and Artificial Cognitive Systems’ (CI-NACS) , 2011 .

[11]  Richard K. Lowe The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Multimedia Learning of Meteorology , 2005 .

[12]  Patricia D. Mautone,et al.  Cognitive Aids for Guiding Graph Comprehension. , 2007 .

[13]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Arrows in Comprehending and Producing Mechanical Diagrams , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Paul U. Lee,et al.  Pictorial and Verbal Tools for Conveying Routes , 1999, COSIT.

[15]  Jacques D. Fleuriot,et al.  Diagrammatically-Driven Formal Verification of Web-Services Composition , 2012, Diagrams.

[16]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[17]  Volker Haarslev,et al.  Theory and Application of Diagrams , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[18]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[19]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Cueing complex animations: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? , 2011 .

[20]  Maneesh Agrawala,et al.  Perceptual interpretation of ink annotations on line charts , 2009, UIST '09.