Unsupervised Cross-Lingual Scaling of Political Texts

Political text scaling aims to linearly order parties and politicians across political dimensions (e.g., left-to-right ideology) based on textual content (e.g., politician speeches or party manifestos). Existing models scale texts based on relative word usage and cannot be used for cross-lingual analyses. Additionally, there is little quantitative evidence that the output of these models correlates with common political dimensions like left-to-right orientation. Experimental results show that the semantically-informed scaling models better predict the party positions than the existing word-based models in two different political dimensions. Furthermore, the proposed models exhibit no drop in performance in the cross-lingual compared to monolingual setting.

[1]  Brandon M. Stewart,et al.  Use of force and civil–military relations in Russia: an automated content analysis , 2009 .

[2]  Dustin Hillard,et al.  Automated classification of congressional legislation , 2006, DG.O.

[3]  Jason Weston,et al.  Open Question Answering with Weakly Supervised Embedding Models , 2014, ECML/PKDD.

[4]  M. Laver,et al.  Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[5]  Justin Grimmer,et al.  Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts , 2013, Political Analysis.

[6]  Jan Snajder,et al.  Analysis of Policy Agendas: Lessons Learned from Automatic Topic Classification of Croatian Political Texts , 2016, LaTeCH@ACL.

[7]  Jeffrey Pennington,et al.  GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation , 2014, EMNLP.

[8]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality , 2013, NIPS.

[9]  Quoc V. Le,et al.  Exploiting Similarities among Languages for Machine Translation , 2013, ArXiv.

[10]  Sven-Oliver Proksch,et al.  A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts , 2007 .

[11]  Robert,et al.  Computer Simulation of Individual Belief Systems * , .

[12]  R. Abelson,et al.  Computer Simulation of Individual Belief Systems1 , 1965 .

[13]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[14]  Yoon Kim,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification , 2014, EMNLP.

[15]  David Vandyke,et al.  Counter-fitting Word Vectors to Linguistic Constraints , 2016, NAACL.

[16]  Jonathan B. Slapin,et al.  Position Taking in European Parliament Speeches , 2010 .

[17]  Xiaojin Zhu,et al.  Introduction to Semi-Supervised Learning , 2009, Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.

[18]  Stuart Soroka,et al.  Affective News: The Automated Coding of Sentiment in Political Texts , 2012 .

[19]  Quoc V. Le,et al.  Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documents , 2014, ICML.

[20]  Alexander S. Yeh,et al.  More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences , 2000, COLING.

[21]  M. Laver,et al.  Estimating policy positions from political texts , 2000 .

[22]  Paul M. Kellstedt.  The Mass Media and the Dynamics of American Racial Attitudes: Media Framing and the Dynamics of Racial Policy Preferences , 2000 .

[23]  Antal van den Bosch,et al.  Automatic thematic classification of election manifestos , 2014, Inf. Process. Manag..

[24]  Sanja Fidler,et al.  Skip-Thought Vectors , 2015, NIPS.

[25]  Alon Lavie,et al.  The Meteor metric for automatic evaluation of machine translation , 2009, Machine Translation.

[26]  Ming Zhou,et al.  Sentiment Embeddings with Applications to Sentiment Analysis , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.