Comparison of Conventional and Cross-Layer Multimedia Transport Schemes for Wireless Networks

Three competing schemes have been proposed for multimedia transport over broadband wireless channels: (a) traditional UDP (Postel, The User Datagram Protocol, 1980 [1]), (b) semi-cross-layer UDP-Lite (The Lightweight User Datagram Protocol, 2004 [2]), and (c) cross-layer header estimation (Khayam et al., IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 9(2):377–385, 2007 [3]; Khayam and Radha, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 6(11):3946–3954, 2007 [4]). In all these schemes, corrupted and lost packets are recovered using FEC at the application layer. In this paper, we analytically and experimentally compare the performances of these broadband wireless multimedia schemes. First, we derive lower bounds on the excepted FEC redundancy required by ideal cross-layer header estimation, UDP and UDP-Lite over an arbitrary-order Markov wireless channel. We show that under realistic wireless channel conditions, the cross-layer header estimation scheme always requires lesser redundancy than UDP and UDP-Lite. We then propose a practical minimum distance decoding (MDD) header estimation scheme, which is receiver-based, low complexity and highly accurate. Trace-driven multimedia experiments over wireless LANs demonstrate that MDD header estimation requires significantly lesser FEC redundancy and renders better video quality than existing schemes.

[1]  Hayder Radha,et al.  Header Detection to Improve Multimedia Quality Over Wireless Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[2]  M. Bottero,et al.  MAC-level partial checksum for H.264 video transmission over 802.11 ad hoc wireless networks , 2005, 2005 IEEE 61st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[3]  Hayder Radha,et al.  Maximum-Likelihood Header Estimation: A Cross-Layer Methodology for Wireless Multimedia , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Godred Fairhurst,et al.  The Lightweight User Datagram Protocol (UDP-Lite) , 2004, RFC.

[5]  Hayder Radha,et al.  Markov and multifractal wavelet models for wireless MAC-to-MAC channels , 2007, Perform. Evaluation.

[6]  A. Servetti,et al.  Error tolerant MAC extension for speech communications over 802.11 WLANs , 2005, 2005 IEEE 61st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[7]  Jill M. Boyce,et al.  An improved UDP protocol for video transmission over Internet-to-wireless networks , 2001, IEEE Trans. Multim..

[8]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  A Markov-Based Channel Model Algorithm for Wireless Networks , 2003, Wirel. Networks.

[9]  R. Blahut Theory and practice of error control codes , 1983 .

[10]  Thomas Wiegand,et al.  Draft ITU-T recommendation and final draft international standard of joint video specification , 2003 .

[11]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  On the statistics of block errors in bursty channels , 1997, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[12]  Anthony D. Joseph,et al.  Performance evaluation of UDP lite for cellular video , 2001, NOSSDAV '01.

[13]  Andreas Willig,et al.  Measurements of a wireless link in an industrial environment using an IEEE 802.11-compliant physical layer , 2002, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[14]  Bogdan M. Wilamowski,et al.  The User Datagram protocol , 2005, The Industrial Information Technology Handbook.