Survival of bovine digital dermatitis treponemes on hoof knife blades and the effects of various disinfectants

Background Bovine digital dermatitis (BDD) is a painful infectious foot disease of cattle, and much evidence implicates a pathogenic role for treponemes. This study measured the survival of BDD treponemes on hoof knife blades and tested the efficacy of relevant disinfectants under laboratory conditions. Methods Two strains of BDD treponemes were applied to hoof knife blades under aerobic conditions. Swabs were taken at different time points (10 minutes, one hour, two hours, four hours and 18 hours) and again after 20-second disinfection time with one of five disinfectants. Swabs were used directly for nested PCR to detect treponemes or inoculated for anaerobic growth, and subsequently examined using phase contrast microscopy and PCR. Results BDD treponeme DNA was detectable by nested PCR at all survival time points, and these organisms were culturable from hoof knives for two hours after exposure under aerobic conditions in the laboratory. Three of the five disinfectants—1 per cent volume per volume (v/v) FAM30®, 2 per cent weight per volume (w/v) Virkon® or 2 per cent (v/v) sodium hypochlorite—were effective at preventing visible growth of treponemes following 20-seconds contact, and 1 per cent (v/v) FAM30® also prevented detection of treponemes by PCR. Conclusion Treponeme viability of two hours under aerobic conditions suggests BDD treponemes could be transmitted between cows on hoof knives. It is therefore important to apply a disinfection protocol during foot-trimming; the authors have identified three common disinfectants that may be suitable.

[1]  C. Heuer,et al.  Farm level risk factors for bovine digital dermatitis in Taranaki, New Zealand: An analysis using a Bayesian hurdle model. , 2018, Veterinary journal.

[2]  R. Blowey,et al.  Survival of contagious ovine digital dermatitis (CODD)-associated treponemes on disposable gloves after handling CODD-affected feet , 2017, Veterinary Record.

[3]  R. Murray,et al.  Bovine digital dermatitis: Current concepts from laboratory to farm. , 2016, Veterinary journal.

[4]  L. E. Sullivan,et al.  Presence of digital dermatitis treponemes on cattle and sheep hoof trimming equipment , 2014, Veterinary Record.

[5]  M. Boyé,et al.  Targeting the Treponemal Microbiome of Digital Dermatitis Infections by High-Resolution Phylogenetic Analyses and Comparison with Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization , 2013, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[6]  D. Döpfer,et al.  Short communication: minimum bactericidal concentration of disinfectants evaluated for bovine digital dermatitis-associated Treponema phagedenis-like spirochetes. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  C. Hart,et al.  In vitro susceptibility of bovine digital dermatitis associated spirochaetes to antimicrobial agents. , 2009, Veterinary microbiology.

[8]  C. Hart,et al.  Association of Unique, Isolated Treponemes with Bovine Digital Dermatitis Lesions , 2009, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[9]  C. Hart,et al.  Three unique groups of spirochetes isolated from digital dermatitis lesions in UK cattle. , 2008, Veterinary microbiology.

[10]  G. Mcdonnell,et al.  Antisepsis, Disinfection, and Sterilization: Types, Action, and Resistance, Second Edition , 2007 .

[11]  C. Hart,et al.  Isolation of Waddlia malaysiensis, A Novel Intracellular Bacterium, from Fruit Bat (Eonycteris spelaea) , 2005, Emerging infectious diseases.

[12]  R. Walker,et al.  Molecular Typing of Papillomatous Digital Dermatitis-Associated Treponema Isolates Based on Analysis of 16S-23S Ribosomal DNA Intergenic Spacer Regions , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  L. Garber,et al.  Papillomatous digital dermatitis and associated risk factors in US dairy herds. , 1999, Preventive veterinary medicine.