Scenario analysis on CO2 emissions reduction potential in China's iron and steel industry

The international climate community has begun to assess a range of possible options for strengthening the international climate change effort after 2012. Analysis of the potential for sector-based emissions reduction and relevant mitigation options will provide the necessary background information for the debate. In order to assess the CO2 abatement potential of China's steel industry, a model was developed using LEAP software to generate 3 different CO2 emission scenarios for the industry from 2000 to 2030. The abatement potentials of different scenarios were compared, and their respective feasibilities were assessed according to the cost information. High priority abatement measures were then identified. The results show that the average CO2 abatement per year in the Recent Policy scenario and in the New Policy scenario, compared with the reference scenario, are 51 and 107 million tons, respectively. The corresponding total incremental costs are 9.34 and 80.95 billion dollars. It is concluded that there is great potential for CO2 abatement in China's steel industry. Adjusting the structure of the industry and technological advancement will play an important role in emissions reduction. Successful implementation of current sustainable development policies and measures will result in CO2 abatement at a low cost. However, to achieve higher levels of abatement, the cost will increase dramatically. In the near future, specific energy conservation technologies such as dry coke quenching, exhaust gas and heat recovery equipment will be of great significance. However, taking a long term perspective, emissions reduction will rely more on the adjustment of production processes and the application of more modern large scale plants. Advanced blast furnace technology will inevitably play an important role.

[1]  Dan Wei,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions trading among Pacific Rim countries: An analysis of policies to bring developing countries to the bargaining table , 2008 .

[2]  Lars Mathiesen,et al.  Climate Policy and the steel industry: achieving global emission reductions by an incomplete climate agreement , 2004 .

[3]  Li Ji,et al.  Energy use and carbon dioxide emissions from steel production in China , 2002 .

[4]  László Szabó,et al.  Technological prospects and CO2 emission trading analyses in the iron and steel industry: A global model , 2005 .

[5]  Kevin A. Baumert,et al.  Navigating the Numbers , 2005 .

[6]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Energy intensity in the iron and steel industry: a comparison of physical and economic indicators , 1997 .

[7]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Energy efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions reduction opportunities in the U.S. Iron and Steel sector , 1999 .

[8]  Ho Jun Song,et al.  Environmental and economic assessment of the chemical absorption process in Korea using the LEAP model , 2007 .

[9]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  International comparison of CO2 emission trends in the iron and steel industry , 2002 .

[10]  Matthias Ruth,et al.  Vintage structure dynamics and climate change policies: the case of US iron and steel , 2002 .

[11]  Asbjørn Torvanger,et al.  Climate policy beyond 2012: A survey of long-term targets and future frameworks , 2004 .

[12]  Martina Bosi,et al.  EXPLORING OPTIONS FOR "SECTORAL CREDITING MECHANISMS" , 2005 .

[13]  Berend Wilhelm Daniëls,et al.  Transition paths towards CO2 emission reduction in the steel industry , 2002 .