The Learning Environment of High School Students in Chemistry and Biology Laboratories.

Abstract In this article a comparison of students’ perceptions of laboratory classes in chemistry and biology is presented. By using the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI), pronounced and significant differences between chemistry and biology laboratory environments were found on two of the subscales: ‘Integration’ that describes the extent to which its laboratory activities are integrated with non‐laboratory and classroom learning and ‘Open‐endedness’, a subscale that measures the extent to which the laboratory emphasises an open‐ended, divergent, and an individualised approach to experimentation. It is suggested that the SLEI can be considered as a sensitive tool to measure students’ perceptions of their learning environment in different subject matters during the laboratory work. In this study the SLEI was also used to compare students’ actual and preferred learning environments and to explore gender differences regarding this issue.

[1]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  Socio‐psychological Environments and Learning: a quantitative synthesis , 1981 .

[2]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research , 1982 .

[3]  A comparison of the actual and preferred classroom learning environment in biology and chemistry as perceived by high school students , 1986 .

[4]  B. Fraser.  Learning environment in curriculum evaluation: A review , 1981 .

[5]  H. Walberg.  A Model for Research on Instruction , 1970, The School Review.

[6]  W. Welch.  Review of the research and evaluation program of harvard project physics , 1973 .

[7]  Bat-Sheva Eylon,et al.  Revision of Course Materials on the Basis of Research on Conceptual Difficulties. , 1986 .

[8]  Rudolfo Chávez Chávez.  The Use of High-Inference Measures To Study Classroom Climates: A Review , 1984 .

[9]  B. Fraser,et al.  Science Laboratory Classroom Climate in British Schools and Universities , 1993 .

[10]  J. C. Egelston.  Inductive vs. traditional methods of teaching high school biology laboratory experiments , 1973 .

[11]  B. Fraser,et al.  Development and cross-national validation of a laboratory classroom environment instrument for senior high school science , 1993 .

[12]  J. B. Kahle.  Images of Scientists: Gender Issues in Science Classrooms. What Research Says to the Science and Mathematics Teacher. Number 4. , 1989 .

[13]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarowitz,et al.  Student‐student interactions in science classrooms: A naturalistic study , 1984 .

[14]  B. Fraser,et al.  Assessment of the psychosocial environment of university science laboratory classrooms: a cross-national study , 1992 .

[15]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  The measurement of the interest in, and attitudes to, laboratory work amongst Israeli high school chemistry students , 1976 .

[16]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  A Comparative Study of Chemistry Students' Perception of the Learning Environment in High Schools and Vocational Schools. , 1980 .

[17]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  Use of Actual and Preferred Classroom Environment Scales in Person-Environment Fit Research. , 1983 .

[18]  Frances Lawrenz,et al.  Student perception of the classroom learning environment in biology, chemistry, and physics courses , 1976 .

[19]  Joseph J. Schwab.  Biology teachers' handbook , 1963 .