Strategies for Optimal MAC Parameters Tuning in IEEE 802.15.6 Wearable Wireless Sensor Networks

Wireless body area networks (WBAN) has penetrated immensely in revolutionizing the classical heath-care system. Recently, number of WBAN applications has emerged which introduce potential limits to existing solutions. In particular, IEEE 802.15.6 standard has provided great flexibility, provisions and capabilities to deal emerging applications. In this paper, we investigate the application-specific throughput analysis by fine-tuning the physical (PHY) and medium access control (MAC) parameters of the IEEE 802.15.6 standard. Based on PHY characterizations in narrow band, at the MAC layer, carrier sense multiple access collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) and scheduled access protocols are extensively analyzed. It is concluded that, IEEE 802.15.6 standard can satisfy most of the WBANs applications throughput requirements by maximum achieving 680 Kbps. However, those emerging applications which require high quality audio or video transmissions, standard is not able to meet their constraints. Moreover, delay, energy efficiency and successful packet reception are considered as key performance metrics for comparing the MAC protocols. CSMA/CA protocol provides the best results to meet the delay constraints of medical and non-medical WBAN applications. Whereas, the scheduled access approach, performs very well both in energy efficiency and packet reception ratio.

[1]  Gregory T. A. Kovacs,et al.  A multiparameter wearable physiologic monitoring system for space and terrestrial applications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[2]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  QoE-based optimal resource allocation in wireless healthcare networks: opportunities and challenges , 2015, Wirel. Networks.

[3]  Nick F. Timmons,et al.  An energy analysis of IEEE 802.15.6 scheduled access modes , 2010, 2010 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[4]  Elyes Ben Hamida,et al.  Surveying Wearable Human Assistive Technology for Life and Safety Critical Applications: Standards, Challenges and Opportunities , 2014, Sensors.

[5]  Mário Serafim Nunes,et al.  Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.11e , 2002, The 13th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[6]  Chiara Buratti,et al.  On the performance of an IEEE 802.15.6 Wireless Body Area Network , 2011, EW.

[7]  Elyes Ben Hamida,et al.  Investigating the impact of human activity on the performance of wireless networks — An experimental approach , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on "A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks" (WoWMoM).

[8]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Body Area Networks: A Survey , 2010, Mob. Networks Appl..

[9]  Kyung Sup Kwak,et al.  Throughput and delay limits of IEEE 802.15.6 , 2011, 2011 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[10]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  A survey of wireless technologies coexistence in WBAN: analysis and open research issues , 2014, Wireless Networks.

[11]  Jelena V. Misic,et al.  IEEE 802.15.6 under saturation: Some problems to be expected , 2011, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[12]  Jelena V. Misic,et al.  MAC performance modeling of IEEE 802.15.6-based WBANs over Rician-faded channels , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[13]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  An Enhanced Mobile-Healthcare Emergency System Based on Extended Chaotic Maps , 2013, Journal of Medical Systems.

[14]  Hoi-Jun Yoo,et al.  A 5.5mW IEEE-802.15.6 wireless body-area-network standard transceiver for multichannel electro-acupuncture application , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers.

[15]  Yang Hao,et al.  Study of line of sight (LOS) and none line of sight (NLOS) ultra wideband off-body radio propagation for body centric wireless communications in indoor , 2011, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[16]  Elyes Ben Hamida,et al.  Impact of the Physical Layer Modeling on the Accuracy and Scalability of Wireless Network Simulation , 2009, Simul..

[17]  William P. Marnane,et al.  Energy-Efficient Low Duty Cycle MAC Protocol for Wireless Body Area Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[18]  Xiaolei Dong,et al.  Securing m-healthcare social networks: challenges, countermeasures and future directions , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[19]  Ramesh Harjani,et al.  An IEEE 802.15.6 Standard Compliant 2.5 nJ/Bit Multiband WBAN Transmitter Using Phase Multiplexing and Injection Locking , 2015, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[20]  Elyes Ben Hamida,et al.  Wearable Body-to-Body networks for critical and rescue operations — The CROW2 project , 2014, 2014 IEEE 25th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communication (PIMRC).

[21]  Jim Morrison,et al.  An energy analysis of IEEE 802.15.6 scheduled access modes , 2010, 2010 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[22]  Jelena V. Misic,et al.  Analysis of CSMA/CA Mechanism of IEEE 802.15.6 under Non-Saturation Regime , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[23]  Elyes Ben Hamida,et al.  Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.6 MAC for Wearable Body Sensor Networks using a Space-Time dependent radio link model , 2014, 2014 IEEE/ACS 11th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA).

[24]  Elyes Ben Hamida,et al.  Topology Dynamics and Network Architecture Performance in Wireless Body Sensor Networks , 2011, 2011 4th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security.

[25]  Oliver King,et al.  A 1V 5mA multimode IEEE 802.15.6/bluetooth low-energy WBAN transceiver for biotelemetry applications , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference.

[26]  Elyes Ben Hamida,et al.  Towards accurate mobility and radio link modeling for IEEE 802.15.6 wearable body sensor networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE 10th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[27]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Algorithm design for data communications in duty-cycled wireless sensor networks: A survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[28]  Dan Keun Sung,et al.  Throughput, energy consumption, and energy efficiency of IEEE 802.15.6 body area network (BAN) MAC protocol , 2012, 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC).

[29]  Elyes Ben Hamida,et al.  Research Trends in Multi-standard Device-to-Device Communication in Wearable Wireless Networks , 2015, CrownCom.

[30]  Elyes Ben Hamida,et al.  Advances in Wearable Sensor Technology and its Applications in Mobile Workforce's Health Monitoring and Safety Management , 2014 .

[31]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  QoS-Aware Health Monitoring System Using Cloud-Based WBANs , 2014, Journal of Medical Systems.

[32]  Aleksey Pesterev,et al.  Bi-Fi: An Embedded Sensor/System Architecture for Remote Biological Monitoring , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[33]  Christofer Toumazou,et al.  Energy Efficient Medium Access Protocol for Wireless Medical Body Area Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[34]  Olivier Berder,et al.  TAD-MAC: Traffic-Aware Dynamic MAC Protocol for Wireless Body Area Sensor Networks , 2012, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems.

[35]  K. S. Deepak,et al.  Energy efficiency of IEEE 802.15.6 based wireless body area networks in scheduled access mode , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI).

[36]  Elyes Ben Hamida,et al.  Interference Mitigation and Coexistence Strategies in IEEE 802.15.6 Based Wearable Body-to-Body Networks , 2015, CrownCom.