Using the Donabedian framework to examine the quality and safety of nursing service innovation.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the safety and quality of nurse practitioner service using the audit framework of Structure, Process and Outcome. BACKGROUND Health service and workforce reform are on the agenda of governments and other service providers seeking to contain healthcare costs whilst providing safe and effective health care to communities. The nurse practitioner service is one health workforce innovation that has been adopted globally to improve timely access to clinical care, but there is scant literature reporting evaluation of the quality of this service innovation. DESIGN A mixed-methods design within the Donabedian evaluation framework was used. METHODS The Donabedian framework was used to evaluate the Structure, Process and Outcome of nurse practitioner service. A range of data collection approaches was used, including stakeholder survey (n = 36), in-depth interviews (11 patients and 13 nurse practitioners) and health records data on service processes. RESULTS The study identified that adequate and detailed preparation of Structure and Process is essential for the successful implementation of a service innovation. The multidisciplinary team was accepting of the addition of nurse practitioner service, and nurse practitioner clinical care was shown to be effective, satisfactory and safe from the perspective of the clinician stakeholders and patients. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that the Donabedian framework of Structure, Process and Outcome evaluation is a valuable and validated approach to examine the safety and quality of a service innovation. Furthermore, in this study, specific Structure elements were shown to influence the quality of service processes further validating the framework and the interdependence of the Structure, Process and Outcome components. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Understanding the Structure and Process requirements for establishing nursing service innovation lays the foundation for safe, effective and patient-centred clinical care.

[1]  C. Naughton,et al.  National independent evaluation of the nurse and midwife prescribing initiative , 2009 .

[2]  Lucie Agosta Patient satisfaction with nurse practitioner‐delivered primary healthcare services , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

[3]  H. Rushforth,et al.  Why is the regulation of advanced practice essential? , 2011, British journal of nursing.

[4]  L. Naranjo,et al.  Applying Donabedian's Theory as a Framework for Bariatric Surgery Accreditation , 2011 .

[5]  H. Vrijhoef,et al.  The value of nurse practitioners in Dutch general practices. , 2010, Quality in primary care.

[6]  A. Gardner,et al.  The status of Australian nurse practitioners: the first national census. , 2009, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[7]  R L Kane,et al.  Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomized trial. , 2000, JAMA.

[8]  T. Weiland,et al.  Perceptions of nurse practitioners by emergency department doctors in Australia , 2010, International journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  A. Chang,et al.  A Delphi study to validate an advanced practice nursing tool. , 2010, Journal of advanced nursing.

[10]  V. Melby,et al.  Developing an advanced nurse practitioner service in emergency care: attitudes of nurses and doctors. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[11]  A. Donabedian,et al.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed? , 1988, JAMA.

[12]  A. Gardner,et al.  Nurse Practitioner competency standards: findings from collaborative Australian and New Zealand research. , 2006, International journal of nursing studies.

[13]  Leanne Boyd,et al.  Time to clarify--the value of advanced practice nursing roles in health care. , 2012, Journal of advanced nursing.

[14]  A. Chang,et al.  Making nursing work: breaking through the role confusion of advanced practice nursing. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[15]  R. Crouch,et al.  A time for international standards?: comparing the Emergency Nurse Practitioner role in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. , 2007, Accident and emergency nursing.

[16]  A. Gardner,et al.  The status of Australian nurse practitioners: the second national census. , 2009, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[17]  H. Cheng,et al.  Medical Team Satisfaction With Nurse Practitioner Clinical Performance , 2008, The journal of nursing research : JNR.

[18]  H. Vrijhoef,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of substituting physicians with diabetes nurse specialists: a randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. , 2012, Journal of advanced nursing.

[19]  J. Considine,et al.  Sustainable workforce reform: case study of Victorian nurse practitioner roles. , 2010, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[20]  A. Gardner,et al.  The core role of the nurse practitioner: practice, professionalism and clinical leadership. , 2007, Journal of clinical nursing.

[21]  Anne Gardner,et al.  Clients' understanding of the role of nurse practitioners. , 2010, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[22]  Chris Salisbury,et al.  Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  R. Daniels,et al.  Primary care , 1998, BMJ : British Medical Journal.